Author Archives: Hall

CA8: SW for search of def’s person wasn’t particular, but there was a reference to the affidavit; GFE applies

The search warrant to search defendant’s person for things wasn’t particular, but the good faith exception applies. It referred to the affidavit which wasn’t present, but they remembered it. The search warrant wasn’t so deficient that it could not be … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on CA8: SW for search of def’s person wasn’t particular, but there was a reference to the affidavit; GFE applies

CA4: Def in rental car preserved standing issue; remanded for application of Byrd

Defendant was in a rental car, and he moved to suppress. He was denied standing under existing case law, but that was abrogated in Byrd. SCOTUS GVR’ed. Remanded for application of Byrd and whatever else. United States v. Houston, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA4: Def in rental car preserved standing issue; remanded for application of Byrd

CO: Person arrested at MJ grow but not charged can get his seized property back

An uncharged person originally arrested at an alleged illegal marijuana grow has standing to recover his own property seized from him. Boudette v. State, 2018 COA 109, 2018 Colo. App. LEXIS 1036 (July 26, 2018). Defendant’s bicycle rack on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CO: Person arrested at MJ grow but not charged can get his seized property back

N.D.Iowa: Reasonable mistaken identity justified stop

Defendant’s stop was based on reasonable suspicion he was in the country illegally, but it was a case of mistaken identity. “Defendant was observed emerging from the vicinity of the target’s residence. Defendant closely resembled the target. Any discrepancy between … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Reasonable mistaken identity justified stop

VI: Officer’s use of “legal buzz words” with “rote and mechanical” testimony and then memory failures leads trial court to conclude he’s not credible

The officer’s use of “legal buzz words” with “rote and mechanical” testimony and then memory failures leads trial court to conclude he’s not credible. People v. Stevens, 2018 V.I. LEXIS 70 (Super. Ct. July 26, 2018):

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on VI: Officer’s use of “legal buzz words” with “rote and mechanical” testimony and then memory failures leads trial court to conclude he’s not credible

CA11: “The record shows” without showing it is not a Franks “substantial preliminary showing”

Defendant failed to make an offer of proof as required by Franks. Merely saying “the record shows” or something like that without more is not a “substantial preliminary showing.” United States v. Ward, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20674 (11th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: “The record shows” without showing it is not a Franks “substantial preliminary showing”

ME: Def was about to go into surgery after suspected DWI and accident; warrantless blood draw was with exigency and PC

Defendant was in a serious accident, and he was about to go into surgery. The blood draw at the request of the police was with exigent circumstances and probable cause. State v. Palmer, 2018 ME 108, 2018 Me. LEXIS 111 … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on ME: Def was about to go into surgery after suspected DWI and accident; warrantless blood draw was with exigency and PC

OR: Late night stop of apparently intoxicated driver permits officer to ask about weapons

During a stop for suspected DUI late at night, the officer can legitimately ask the defendant whether he is armed. State v. Miller, 363 Ore. 374, 2018 Ore. LEXIS 602 (July 26, 2018):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Late night stop of apparently intoxicated driver permits officer to ask about weapons

CA2: Def wore GPS for two years for parole, but parole officers turned over monitoring to feds; monitoring not unreasonable

Defendant was on state parole and wore a GPS ankle monitor for two years. Parole turned over monitoring to the feds who monitored him to see what he was doing. The district court suppressed (United States v. Lambus, 251 F. … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: Def wore GPS for two years for parole, but parole officers turned over monitoring to feds; monitoring not unreasonable

CA3: What is a “Rodriquz moment” in dicta, not even decided

A long and interesting, albeit ultimately unnecessary, discussion of Rodriquez and what is a “Rodriguez moment.” There was reasonable suspicion on the totality for a longer detention. United States v. Green, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20655 (3d Cir. July 25, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: What is a “Rodriquz moment” in dicta, not even decided

The Atlantic: The FISA Fiasco’s Silver Lining

The Atlantic: The FISA Fiasco’s Silver Lining by April Doss: Recently released documents should put to rest fear that the process of surveilling Americans could be as simple as filling out a form for a perfunctory review.

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on The Atlantic: The FISA Fiasco’s Silver Lining

N.D.N.Y.: Public employer’s prior failure to search work computers under policy didn’t create a REP

Plaintiff did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in her work issued computers under the school computer privacy policy. The fact they’d never looked before doesn’t otherwise create a reasonable expectation of privacy. Rissetto v. Clinton Essex Warren Wash. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Public employer’s prior failure to search work computers under policy didn’t create a REP

MD: Stop-and-frisk might have been invalid, but def fled and that made it valid

Defendant was arguably subjected to an invalid stop and frisk, but his flight was an intervening circumstance supporting finding the gun. Thornton v. State, 2018 Md. App. LEXIS 716 (July 25, 2018). “The testimony at the suppression hearing demonstrated that … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on MD: Stop-and-frisk might have been invalid, but def fled and that made it valid

NY2: Murder conviction reversed: state failed to show PC to take def’s DNA

Probable cause was not shown to take defendant’s DNA. “Here, as the People correctly concede, the affidavit of the detective submitted in support of the search warrant application was conclusory and insufficient to establish probable cause to issue the warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY2: Murder conviction reversed: state failed to show PC to take def’s DNA

CA2: In removal proceedings, pet’rs made a prima facie case of egregious 4A violation; remanded

“In removal proceedings before the IJ, both petitioners moved to suppress the evidence obtained during the search, arguing that the search violated the Fourth Amendment because it was conducted without a warrant, consent, or exigent circumstances, and, even assuming the … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA2: In removal proceedings, pet’rs made a prima facie case of egregious 4A violation; remanded

Lawfare: Carpenter and the End of Bulk Surveillance of Americans

Lawfare: Carpenter and the End of Bulk Surveillance of Americans by Sharon Bradford Franklin:

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on Lawfare: Carpenter and the End of Bulk Surveillance of Americans

DE holds that exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to probation revocations

The exclusionary rule does not apply to probation revocation proceedings. No federal case holds to the contrary. Thompson v. State, 2018 Del. LEXIS 346 (July 24, 2018). The city’s administrative warrants for petitioner’s dilapidated buildings were properly issued. By statute, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on DE holds that exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to probation revocations

NJ: Hearsay affidavit for DNA was permissible, but the state failed to show PC

Hearsay related by the affiant for defendant’s DNA sample was constitutionally permissible. Nevertheless, the state failed to show probable cause that defendant’s DNA would be on a gun, and the order denying the DNA sample was properly denied. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on NJ: Hearsay affidavit for DNA was permissible, but the state failed to show PC

CA6: Nexus shown to search def’s house for evidence of his drug deals

Defendant’s drug dealing connections were sufficient to establish nexus to his house. Drug dealers cannot immunize their activities by doing drug deals in parking lots. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Jenkins, 2018 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Nexus shown to search def’s house for evidence of his drug deals

Newsweek: Police Are Three Times More Likely to Kill Black Men, Study Finds: ‘Not a Problem Confined to a Single Region’

Newsweek: Police Are Three Times More Likely to Kill Black Men, Study Finds: ‘Not a Problem Confined to a Single Region’ by Scottie Andrew: Police violence and homicide have persistently and disproportionately affected black communities for decades. A new study … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Racial profiling | Comments Off on Newsweek: Police Are Three Times More Likely to Kill Black Men, Study Finds: ‘Not a Problem Confined to a Single Region’