CA3: What is a “Rodriquz moment” in dicta, not even decided

A long and interesting, albeit ultimately unnecessary, discussion of Rodriquez and what is a “Rodriguez moment.” There was reasonable suspicion on the totality for a longer detention. United States v. Green, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20655 (3d Cir. July 25, 2018)*:

Stepping back from these individual factors and considering the “whole picture,” our question remains a fairly straight forward one. After the conversation at the start of the April 5 traffic stop, did Volk possess reasonable suspicion that Green was engaged in criminal activity? At that moment, Volk reasonably believed that Green had provided several misleading statements about his travel, he knew that Green’s trunk carried the odor of marijuana, and he knew that Green had several prior arrests for drug and firearm violations. This evidence of criminal activity was tempered by the fact that, only one day prior, Green consented to a search of his vehicle, which was found free of contraband. Reasonable minds may disagree over the extent to which the results of this search counteracted the various indicia of criminality, but that is precisely the point. Whatever the effect of the prior search, it was not so sanitizing as to make Volk’s suspicion of Green the following day unreasonable. We conclude that Volk had a “particularized and objective” basis for suspecting that Green was engaged in criminal activity on April 5, Cortez, 449 U.S. at 417, so extending the traffic stop to facilitate a dog sniff was permissible, Rodriguez, 135 S. Ct. at 1615.

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.