Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Ill.: Compelled use of biometrics to open a cell phone doesn’t violate 4A or 5A

“[T]his Court holds that compelling an individual to scan their biometrics, and in particular their fingerprints, to unlock a smartphone device neither violates the Fourth nor Fifth Amendment. Accordingly, the Court has signed and authorized the government’s warrant, including the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Compelled use of biometrics to open a cell phone doesn’t violate 4A or 5A

MI: 4A not violated by taking of fingerprints and photographs during a Terry stop

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment rights were not violated by police officers taking their photographs and fingerprints based on reasonable suspicion during valid Terry stops, because plaintiffs had no reasonable expectation of privacy in physical characteristics that were constantly exposed to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: 4A not violated by taking of fingerprints and photographs during a Terry stop

S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

“Ward also argues that the traffic stop was extended by placing him in the back of the police cruiser. … However, the officer(s) needed to walk back to the police cruiser in order to complete the mission of issuing a … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

The Appeal: In a Private Facebook Group, California Police Brag about Breaking State Law to Help ICE

The Appeal: In a Private Facebook Group, California Police Brag about Breaking State Law to Help ICE by Darwin BondGraham (“Some officers have recently boasted about breaking state law and collaborating with ICE, according to messages posted in a private … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on The Appeal: In a Private Facebook Group, California Police Brag about Breaking State Law to Help ICE

E.D.N.Y.: That some NYPD cops are known to lie doesn’t mean these two are because the bodycams and physical evidence make them credible

“The circumstances of the stop, search, and seizure of Defendant demonstrate that there was a strong reasonable suspicion to support a stop and search of Defendant, and then probable cause to arrest him. [¶] Defendant’s main argument is that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: That some NYPD cops are known to lie doesn’t mean these two are because the bodycams and physical evidence make them credible

4A claims not permitted on habeas

Habeas doesn’t recognize Fourth Amendment claims. In re Lopez, 2019 Cal. LEXIS 8819 (Nov. 20, 2019); In re Wood, Wood, 2020 Cal. LEXIS 605 (Jan. 29, 2020). This habeas petitioner doesn’t show any likelihood of success to get appointment of … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention | Comments Off on 4A claims not permitted on habeas

E.D.N.C.: NC law requires RS for a supervision search, and here it’s lacking

North Carolina law requires reasonable suspicion for a supervision search, and here it was completely lacking. The motion to suppress is granted. United States v. Fuller, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202240 (E.D. N.C. Oct. 1, 2019).* State statute discusses concealed … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: NC law requires RS for a supervision search, and here it’s lacking

CA2: BIA erred in not suppressing; a prima facie case of an egregious violation of the 4A was shown because it was apparently race based stop and there was virtually no PC

BIA erred by denying petitioner’s motion to suppress evidence of his alleged alienage. He made out a prima facie case of an egregious violation of his constitutional rights where the evidence tended to show a racial animus in the planning … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Pretext, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA2: BIA erred in not suppressing; a prima facie case of an egregious violation of the 4A was shown because it was apparently race based stop and there was virtually no PC

Four 2255s

2255 claim that officer perjured himself during suppression hearing was already raised there and on appeal and barred here. United States v. Brown, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201044 (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2019).* Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Four 2255s

W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

Defendant challenged one sentence in the affidavit as a Franks violation, but it doesn’t even appear to be false. Moreover, even if that sentence were stricken, there still would be probable cause, and he fails in his burden of proof. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

CA4: Individualized suspicion is now required for border searches of electronic devices but it wasn’t in May 2015, so the GFE applies

Warrantless forensic searches of defendant’s devices in May of 2015 lacked the required nexus to the recognized historic rationales justifying the border search exception to the warrant requirement. Officers had probable cause to suspect that defendant had previously committed grave … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Individualized suspicion is now required for border searches of electronic devices but it wasn’t in May 2015, so the GFE applies

W.D.Pa.: To make an effective attack on a SW affidavit, explain yourself and don’t leave it to the court to try to do it for you

Yes, there were inconsistencies in the informant hearsay, but the defendant doesn’t help the court in what that means. “Thus, Defendant’s hearsay attacks fail to draw the court’s attention to any problem in the magistrate judges’ analysis.” There was double … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: To make an effective attack on a SW affidavit, explain yourself and don’t leave it to the court to try to do it for you

CA9: PC for arrest of ptf for interfering with a LEO arresting another

There was probable cause to arrest plaintiff, a member of Bikers for Christ, for interfering with a law enforcement officer when the officer was attempting to write a ticket for another biker. Thus, there was no Fourth Amendment violation. Stubbs … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: PC for arrest of ptf for interfering with a LEO arresting another

NYTimes: Imagine Being on Trial. With Exonerating Evidence Trapped on Your Phone.

NYTimes: Imagine Being on Trial. With Exonerating Evidence Trapped on Your Phone. by Kashmir Hill (“Public defenders lack access to gadgets and software that could keep their clients out of jail.”)

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on NYTimes: Imagine Being on Trial. With Exonerating Evidence Trapped on Your Phone.

WA: Washington Privacy Act prohibiting unwarned recordings does not apply to law enforcement bodycams and dash cams

The Washington Privacy Act prohibiting unwarned recordings does not apply to law enforcement bodycams and dash cams. “Conversations with uniformed, on-duty law enforcement officers are typically not private conversations.” State v. Clayton, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 2930 (Nov. 19, 2019):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WA: Washington Privacy Act prohibiting unwarned recordings does not apply to law enforcement bodycams and dash cams

WaPo: Police hid a tracking device on a suspect’s car — then charged him with theft for removing it

WaPo: Police hid a tracking device on a suspect’s car — then charged him with theft for removing it by Brittany Shammas (“For about a week in summer 2018, Indiana authorities monitored a suspected drug dealer’s movements using a GPS … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on WaPo: Police hid a tracking device on a suspect’s car — then charged him with theft for removing it

E.D.Tenn.: Consent shown on the totality that def didn’t have to cooperate

“The totality of the circumstances here indicate consent, not mere acquiescence by Defendant. Regarding Defendant’s relevant characteristics, he is an adult, and there is no reason to think this was his first encounter with law enforcement, given that he is … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Consent shown on the totality that def didn’t have to cooperate

D.N.M.: Def’s car’s impoundment wasn’t justified by community caretaking function or need for inventory

The impoundment of defendant’s car wasn’t justified by either the community caretaking function or need for inventory. Whether the vehicle was even involved in a crime was inconclusive at best. United States v. Trujillo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201024 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Community caretaking function, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s car’s impoundment wasn’t justified by community caretaking function or need for inventory

MO: Exigency was shown at the motion to suppress, and more was shown at trial

The trial court denied the motion to suppress because the entry was by exigent circumstances. The trial testimony confirms it. State v. Bolden, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823 (Nov. 19, 2019).* The traffic stop was justified under state law, and, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Exigency was shown at the motion to suppress, and more was shown at trial

PA: State’s seeking the passcode to unencrypt a computer hard drive violates the 5A

The state’s seeking the passcode to unencrypt a computer hard drive violates the Fifth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Davis, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 6463 (Nov. 20, 2019):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Privileges | Comments Off on PA: State’s seeking the passcode to unencrypt a computer hard drive violates the 5A