Author Archives: Hall

D.Me.: DEA affidavit for SW for dealing MJ doesn’t need to exclude state MMJ purposes

The affidavit for search warrant said that multiple informants saw drugs being kept and dealt from defendant’s house and that there was a big safe in there. That’s probable cause. Omission of the possibility defendant was engaged in possession of … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Me.: DEA affidavit for SW for dealing MJ doesn’t need to exclude state MMJ purposes

D.N.M.: Lack of audible response on bodycam of request for consent leads court to conclude govt failed in its burden of proof

In another case involving a DEA’s interaction with a bus passenger in Albuquerque, the officer was friendly enough, but the parting colloquy was “Thank you. Thank you very much, sir. Sir, would you give me permission just to pat you … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Lack of audible response on bodycam of request for consent leads court to conclude govt failed in its burden of proof

S.D.Tex.: Even though def’s Mexican LPN couldn’t be checked except for whether it was in a crime, the officer was still able to inquire

“The record shows that Sgt. Thumman determined almost immediately after the stop that Defendant’s [Mexican] registration was expired, which is an arrestable offense in Texas. Despite the 10-6 [don’t report back unless vehicle used in a crime], he was free … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Even though def’s Mexican LPN couldn’t be checked except for whether it was in a crime, the officer was still able to inquire

IA: Def already stopped in a one-lane alley had officer stop in front of her; not a seizure

“A police officer saw a vehicle driving suspiciously for several minutes in a residential neighborhood at night at a snail’s pace of ten miles per hour. After the vehicle entered a one-lane alley that ran between two streets and then … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Def already stopped in a one-lane alley had officer stop in front of her; not a seizure

N.D.Cal.: Google location history case is dismissed without prejudice

The Google location history case is dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. Plaintiffs don’t show it is an invasion of privacy just because Google tracked only when using Google services. Carpenter and Jones are rejected as binding authority. In … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Google location history case is dismissed without prejudice

Fortune: Why Apple and Google Have ‘No Real Way’ to Stop Surveillance Apps Like ToTok

Fortune: Why Apple and Google Have ‘No Real Way’ to Stop Surveillance Apps Like ToTok by Alyssa Newcomb (“Perhaps the most troubling part of it all is that there would have been no way for either company to detect any … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Fortune: Why Apple and Google Have ‘No Real Way’ to Stop Surveillance Apps Like ToTok

EFF: Ring Throws Customers Under the Bus After Data Breach

EFF: Ring Throws Customers Under the Bus After Data Breach by Cooper Quintin and Bill Budington:

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: Ring Throws Customers Under the Bus After Data Breach

CA1: Govt showed nexus to house that drug dealers keep money, books, customer lists, and product there

The district court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress because there was probable cause to issue the search warrant. It was likely that a drug dealer kept his money, books, and customer lists in a safe place like his residence, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA1: Govt showed nexus to house that drug dealers keep money, books, customer lists, and product there

W.D.Ky.: Bodycam video showed pretext, but there still was a factual and legal basis for stop

Officers on bodycam are talking about pretext, but there was, in fact, a factual and legal basis for the stop that makes pretext irrelevant. United States v. Jones, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219072 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 20, 2019):

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Bodycam video showed pretext, but there still was a factual and legal basis for stop

NYTimes: Giving the Gift of Surveillance

NYTimes: Giving the Gift of Surveillance by Alex Kingsbury (“As 2019 comes to a close, millions of new spying devices are headed for American homes.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Giving the Gift of Surveillance

ID: Visitors during a parole search were subject to reasonable questioning

Visitors on the premises during a parole search are subject to at least some questions under Summers without it being an unreasonable detention. State v. Phipps, 2019 Ida. LEXIS 239 (Dec. 20, 2019):

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on ID: Visitors during a parole search were subject to reasonable questioning

DE: Slim inference for nexus wasn’t enough, and exclusionary rule applies

The affidavit for the search warrant creates only a slim inference at best, and no facts at all, showing a nexus to the place to be searched and the fraud crime under investigation. Therefore, the search warrant lacks probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on DE: Slim inference for nexus wasn’t enough, and exclusionary rule applies

LA1: Parolee’s positive drug screen justified home search

Defendant’s positive drug screens were reason for an unannounced home and cell phone text message parole search. State v. St. Cyre, 2019 La. App. LEXIS 2305 (La. App. 1 Cir. Dec. 19, 2019). An officer found two people asleep in … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA1: Parolee’s positive drug screen justified home search

S.D.Ga.: The fact it was ambiguous whether def’s images were CP or not doesn’t nullify PC for the search

It was ambiguous whether the images that officers believed were on defendant’s computer qualified as child pornography, but the question for probable cause is reason to believe and not sufficient evidence to convict. Even so, the good faith exception applies. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: The fact it was ambiguous whether def’s images were CP or not doesn’t nullify PC for the search

CA6: Def doesn’t show officer delayed stop for drug dog; whole encounter was 5-10 minutes

Defendant argued that the officer delayed the process of issuing a traffic citation by extraneous questioning just to get a dog sniff in within the period before the traffic citation could be completed. Still, the entire process reasonably took ten … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Def doesn’t show officer delayed stop for drug dog; whole encounter was 5-10 minutes

S.D.N.Y.: Typo in SW for emails could be overlooked in “common sense,” nontechnical reading

There was a typo in the affidavit for search warrant for emails, and the government procured another. The typo wasn’t even material because a “common sense” reading of the whole affidavit shows it was typographical error that could be overcome. … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Typo in SW for emails could be overlooked in “common sense,” nontechnical reading

FL2: Herring permits one police mistake for good faith, but not two

The officer gave a wrong name to police communications, and then communications gave a wrong answer back. Two mistakes was too much for Herring, and the exclusionary rule is applied. One mistake may be attenuation; two is not. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on FL2: Herring permits one police mistake for good faith, but not two

DE: Just because criminals communicate by cell phone isn’t enough to show nexus

Defendant’s cell phone search was not based on a logical nexus between defendant’s cell phone and the murder. Just because criminals communicate by cell phone isn’t enough here. State v. Johnson, 2019 Del. Super. LEXIS 661 (Dec. 18, 2019):

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on DE: Just because criminals communicate by cell phone isn’t enough to show nexus

W.D.Mo.: FedEx’s taking a package off its conveyor belt for a dog sniff wasn’t a seizure that interfered with def’s possessory interest

“[T]he police did not ‘seize’ the package until after the dog alerted to the presence of drugs. It was not a seizure to remove the package from the FedEx conveyor belt, carry it 200 feet to the back of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: FedEx’s taking a package off its conveyor belt for a dog sniff wasn’t a seizure that interfered with def’s possessory interest

The Daily Beast: The Surveillance State Quietly Lost a Major Court Case

The Daily Beast: The Surveillance State Quietly Lost a Major Court Case by Spencer Ackerman (“The feds have a habit of rifling without a warrant through NSA data warehouses to find dirt on American citizens. An appeals court ruling may … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on The Daily Beast: The Surveillance State Quietly Lost a Major Court Case