Author Archives: Hall

TN: Issue of issuing magistrate’s jurisdiction moot by automobile exception

Defendant’s dispute over whether the judge issuing the search warrant had jurisdiction over the vehicle from which DNA was taken because it was located in a different county is moot. The officers had probable cause in investigating a bloody homicide, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Issue of issuing magistrate’s jurisdiction moot by automobile exception

NM doesn’t permit questions about travel in routine traffic stops while federal courts do

New Mexico requires under its state constitution that all questions during a traffic stop not be fishing expeditions about other things unless reasonable suspicion is present. Asking about where defendant had been and who he met were not related to … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM doesn’t permit questions about travel in routine traffic stops while federal courts do

WaPo: Amazon bans police use of its facial-recognition technology for a year

WaPo: Amazon bans police use of its facial-recognition technology for a year by Jay Greene:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Amazon bans police use of its facial-recognition technology for a year

D.Ore. grants preliminary injunction against use of tear gas against peaceful protesters

Don’t Shoot Portland v. City of Portland, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100801 (D. Ore. June 9, 2020): While the Court acknowledges that Mayor Wheeler has issued additional guidance on the use of tear gas during these protests, Defendant has not … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on D.Ore. grants preliminary injunction against use of tear gas against peaceful protesters

E.D.N.C.: Police not required to leave car on property of another rather than impound it

The impoundment of defendant’s car on the property of another was reasonable. Officers were not required to wait for defendant to locate somebody to retrieve the car, and they didn’t have to leave it to inconvenience the property owner. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Police not required to leave car on property of another rather than impound it

CA4: “a reasonable jury could find that Jones was both secured and incapacitated” when police shot him; QI denied

“In 2013, Wayne Jones, a black man experiencing homelessness, was stopped by law enforcement in Martinsburg, West Virginia for walking alongside, rather than on, the sidewalk. By the end of this encounter, Jones would be dead. Armed only with a … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: “a reasonable jury could find that Jones was both secured and incapacitated” when police shot him; QI denied

W.D.Tenn.: Affidavit was conclusory as to drugs at drug dealer’s home [but it’s easy to fix next time]

The affidavit for search warrant failed to show nexus between defendant’s alleged drug dealing a month earlier and his residence. “The only information included in the affidavit to support this conclusory belief is the fact that Defendant, who happens to … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Affidavit was conclusory as to drugs at drug dealer’s home [but it’s easy to fix next time]

CA10: Unappealed suppression order from one district collateral estoppel on reindictment on same facts in a different district

Defendant was indicted for child pornography, and the district court suppressed. The government appealed but dismissed the appeal without filing a brief. In the district court it dismissed the indictment. Later, on the same evidence from the same search warrant, … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Unappealed suppression order from one district collateral estoppel on reindictment on same facts in a different district

CA10: 15-minute call to EPIC when officer given inconsistent travel plans wasn’t unreasonable

Inconsistent travel plans coming from the driver and passenger justified a 15 minute call to EPIC to see if the vehicle had crossed the border recently, and this was not unreasonable. United States v. Morales, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 17865 … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: 15-minute call to EPIC when officer given inconsistent travel plans wasn’t unreasonable

MA: Owner’s DL was suspended, and it wasn’t apparent that driver wasn’t owner when stop occurred

Similar to Glover, Massachusetts held well before that the suspension of the owner’s DL can justify a stop. There was no indication [such as gender] here that the driver could not be the owner, so the stop was with reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MA: Owner’s DL was suspended, and it wasn’t apparent that driver wasn’t owner when stop occurred

CA4: Opening jail legal mail away from inmate violated 1A, but separate 4A claim for that not clearly established

Opening pretrial detainee’s legal mail 15 times outside his presence was a First Amendment violation, even though he’d been suspected of receiving contraband about the witnesses against him both in legal and nonlegal mail. The First Amendment violation is injury … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA4: Opening jail legal mail away from inmate violated 1A, but separate 4A claim for that not clearly established

Proposed Justice in Policing Act of 2020, some proposals on arrest and frisk, qualified immunity, use of force, and no-knock warrants

Proposed Justice in Policing Act of 2020 in the House of Representatives: some proposals on arrest and frisk, qualified immunity, use of force, and searches: In § 103, repeals case law on qualified immunity in revised § 1983 (pdf at … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Proposed Justice in Policing Act of 2020, some proposals on arrest and frisk, qualified immunity, use of force, and no-knock warrants

Cal.2: Mistake of fact def was on probation made probation search unreasonable

Officers thought defendant was on probation and searched him, but he wasn’t at the time. The state put on no evidence of good faith, so the search fails for lack of a factual or legal basis for the search. People … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.2: Mistake of fact def was on probation made probation search unreasonable

WV: Domestic disturbance call with injuries justified warrantless entry

Police responded to a domestic disturbance call and found defendant’s wife injured and distraught. They entered the house without an arrest or search warrant to find defendant, and he was in bed. They asked him to show his hands to … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WV: Domestic disturbance call with injuries justified warrantless entry

NJ: Destruction by policy of audio of telephonic SW application required suppression even without bad faith

This case proceeded on a telephonic search warrant where the application was recorded as required by law. The recording, however, was destroyed in 90 days under the department’s records retention policy. While the destruction wasn’t in bad faith, the recording … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NJ: Destruction by policy of audio of telephonic SW application required suppression even without bad faith

WI: OUI justifies Gant search incident of vehicle based at least on RS evidence might be found

Arrest for OUI permits a search incident of the interior of defendant’s car for evidence of the offense under Gant based at least on reasonable suspicion. “[P1] We review a decision of the court of appeals affirming the circuit court … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on WI: OUI justifies Gant search incident of vehicle based at least on RS evidence might be found

D.Colo: TRO granted against excessive force or use of chemical agents against peaceful protestors

Abay v. City of Denver, 20-cv-01616-RBJ (D. Colo. June 5, 2020, 8:39 pm):

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on D.Colo: TRO granted against excessive force or use of chemical agents against peaceful protestors

CA3: Officer was face-to-face with citizen informant in a high-crime area about man with a gun; it was sufficiently reliable

“Officer Pickel received a tip that Torres, just moments before, had discharged a firearm in a high-crime area. A brief encounter with police ensued. Only thirty-five seconds elapsed between the time when Officer Pickel ordered Torres to stop and when … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Officer was face-to-face with citizen informant in a high-crime area about man with a gun; it was sufficiently reliable

N.D.Ga.: First class mail is closed to Customs inspection; priority mail is not

There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in first class mail and mail with full postage from a customs search coming into the Virgin Islands. 19 C.F.R. § 145.1. Priority class mail is subject to customs inspection. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: First class mail is closed to Customs inspection; priority mail is not

NM: What was intended for SW and what it says are two different things

The search warrant request for plaintiff’s person and vehicle resulted only in a warrant for the vehicle. What the defendant officer intended doesn’t count in the face of the clear warrant. A forced rectal search and x-ray at a hospital … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NM: What was intended for SW and what it says are two different things