Author Archives: Hall

OH6: Smell of raw marijuana from house was PC

The officers’ smell of raw marijuana at a house was probable cause. This is different than the case of burnt marijuana not justifying a search of the trunk of a car. In an IAC claim, defendant didn’t plead any evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH6: Smell of raw marijuana from house was PC

CA11: Mere trespasser in driveway had no REP there

Defendant was parked in the driveway of what was supposed to be at the time an unoccupied house, and a neighbor called the police. Defendant told them he was an invited visitor, but it was found he lacked a reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Mere trespasser in driveway had no REP there

CA8: While § 922(g)(3) requires an “unlawful user” of drugs in possession of firearms, the question is only PC for seizure; statute is not vague

The government doesn’t need proof beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was an “unlawful user” of controlled substance to seize firearms around drugs with probable cause. And that doesn’t make the § 922(g)(3) vague. United States v. Figueroa-Serrano, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: While § 922(g)(3) requires an “unlawful user” of drugs in possession of firearms, the question is only PC for seizure; statute is not vague

NH: Protective sweep of motel room search justified by presence of others

A protective sweep of defendant’s motel room on his arrest was justified by the fact he was suspected of selling crack out of it and there were three woman also there, one of whom turned her back on the officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NH: Protective sweep of motel room search justified by presence of others

OH2: Officer may ask motorist if he’s armed

A police officer may ask a stopped motorist in a traffic stop whether he is armed without violating the Fourth Amendment. State v. Ferguson, 2020-Ohio-4153, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3051 (2d Dist. Aug. 21, 2020). Defendant’s traffic stop evolved into … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH2: Officer may ask motorist if he’s armed

The Intercept: Her Former Colleagues Called in a “Wellness Check.” Then Police Shot Her to Death.

The Intercept: Her Former Colleagues Called in a “Wellness Check.” Then Police Shot Her to Death. by Natasha Lennard (“The killing of Sandy Guardiola at the hands of a cop illustrates the limitations of brutal, armed police responding to community … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Excessive force | Comments Off on The Intercept: Her Former Colleagues Called in a “Wellness Check.” Then Police Shot Her to Death.

OH2: The fact a SW had a laundry list of 182 things to search for and seize isn’t fatal where def doesn’t show what was overseized

The search warrant here was for illegal fireworks and listed 182 items to be seized, including fireworks. “Johnson also contends the warrant is invalid because it authorized the seizure of a boilerplate list of 182 items, all or most of … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Overseizure, Particularity | Comments Off on OH2: The fact a SW had a laundry list of 182 things to search for and seize isn’t fatal where def doesn’t show what was overseized

D.Mass.: Def satisfied Franks to get a hearing on the statements being intentionally or recklessly false

Defendant satisfied his Franks burden of a substantial preliminary showing of recklessness on the informant’s reliability to get a hearing. The court is persuaded in part because of the weak showing of nexus. Still, however, defendant’s burden at the Franks … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def satisfied Franks to get a hearing on the statements being intentionally or recklessly false

N.D.Ga.: Ordering def to ground at gunpoint and a full search of his pockets was an arrest and not a frisk; it was still, however, justified

Police arrived at defendant’s house to search, and he came out the front door. At gunpoint, he laid on the ground and he was handcuffed and his pockets searched. It was not a patdown for weapons, but an emptying of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Ordering def to ground at gunpoint and a full search of his pockets was an arrest and not a frisk; it was still, however, justified

DC: Cell phone SW was overbroad and exceeded the PC; no GFE

“We conclude that Mr. Burns has established violations of his rights under both the Fourth and the Sixth Amendments. Police sought search warrants that authorized an unlimited review of the contents of his cell phones for “any evidence” of murder … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth | Comments Off on DC: Cell phone SW was overbroad and exceeded the PC; no GFE

CA5: “I don’t know, it’s not my vehicle” is a disavowal of standing

“Rather than establishing an expectation of privacy, Beasley expressly disavowed ownership of the vehicle, saying, ‘I don’t know, it’s not my vehicle.’ Because he disclaimed ownership of the vehicle, the district court appropriately determined that Beasley lacked any expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: “I don’t know, it’s not my vehicle” is a disavowal of standing

MS: Knowingly searching wrong house by choosing to disregard error in SW made Bureau of Narcotics liable

In a case that smacks of the good faith exception causing a search of the wrong house that should never have happened, the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics knowingly raided the wrong house without knocking and announcing. Trial testimony showed that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Knock and announce | Comments Off on MS: Knowingly searching wrong house by choosing to disregard error in SW made Bureau of Narcotics liable

E.D.Mo.: No REP against photographing tattoo on chest at time of arrest

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy not to have a tattoo on his chest under his shirt photographed on his arrest. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising it. Shumpert v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149584 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No REP against photographing tattoo on chest at time of arrest

CA5: IP address accessing bank accounts for alleged fraud was PC as to that address

“Based on these facts, it was not unreasonable for law enforcement to believe there was probable cause that evidence of the scheme would be found at Traore’s residence nearly a year after the bank account was last accessed from his … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA5: IP address accessing bank accounts for alleged fraud was PC as to that address

IA: No REP in contents of car visible by flashlight in a hotel parking lot

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the inside of a car in a hotel parking lot that could be seen by an officer with a flashlight. State v. Bean, 2020 Iowa App. LEXIS 825 (Aug. 19, 2020). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IA: No REP in contents of car visible by flashlight in a hotel parking lot

W.D.Tex.: Whether defense counsel should file a motion to suppress is strategic decision

“A decision of whether or not to file a motion to suppress is a strategic choice of counsel.” Here, there was no factual basis to file a motion to suppress. Waters v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147764 (W.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Knock and announce | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Whether defense counsel should file a motion to suppress is strategic decision

CA5: Traffic safety checkpoint was scantly justified, but still reasonable

A Mississippi traffic safety checkpoint was reasonable on the totality because every car was stopped, even though the programmatic purpose of the checkpoint was scant. Reasonable suspicion developed that the occupants of the vehicle were being trafficked. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Ineffective assistance, Roadblocks | Comments Off on CA5: Traffic safety checkpoint was scantly justified, but still reasonable

CA6: Seizure under a SW is not a 5A taking

The consensus of several other circuits is that seizing property under a search warrant is not subject to the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause. See, e.g., Lech v. Jackson, 791 Fed. Appx. 711, 717 (10th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, No. 19-1123, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Seizure under a SW is not a 5A taking

Cal.3: In a recreational MJ state, more is required for a car search than just possession of some marijuana

Possession of a legal amount of recreational marijuana isn’t probable cause for search without more. “Therefore, pursuant to Lee, there must be additional evidence, beyond mere possession of a legal amount of marijuana, to support a reasonable belief the defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.3: In a recreational MJ state, more is required for a car search than just possession of some marijuana

CA10: No distinction between civil and criminal traffic infractions under the 4A

There is no distinction between civil and criminal traffic infractions under the Fourth Amendment under Whren and Arizona v. Johnson. Even a patdown can occur in a civil infraction stop. United States v. Meadows, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 26120 (10th … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: No distinction between civil and criminal traffic infractions under the 4A