Author Archives: Hall

CA10: There was no violation of curtilage for def’s home on grounds of 24/7 storage company

Defendant lived on the grounds of a 24/7 storage building company. At 2:30 am, officers investigating saw cars coming and going from the residence. They approached his building, and the approach way wasn’t curtilage under Dunn. United States v. Powell, … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: There was no violation of curtilage for def’s home on grounds of 24/7 storage company

ID: Def ordered from home in DV case had no standing in the home when violating order

Defendant ordered to stay away from his own marital home as a result of domestic violence no contact order had no standing in the house when he retreated inside to avoid the officer there to check on his violation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standing | Comments Off on ID: Def ordered from home in DV case had no standing in the home when violating order

S.D.Ga.: A vehicle search doesn’t have to happen as soon as PC develops; prudent to wait for backup

“Defendant retorts that, if in fact Sgt. Concepcion discovered the marijuana odor early in the traffic stop, he should have begun the search immediately rather than waiting for the arrival of Investigator Gould, citing no caselaw in support. The Court … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: A vehicle search doesn’t have to happen as soon as PC develops; prudent to wait for backup

MI: Ordering def out of his house for a misdemeanor arrest without showing of exigency unreasonable

Defendant’s arrest violated the Fourth Amendment because it was the product of an illegal constructive entry without any exigency that occurred when armed police officers surrounded his trailer and ordered the occupants out. They could not have arrested defendant for … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MI: Ordering def out of his house for a misdemeanor arrest without showing of exigency unreasonable

N.-M.: Broad cellphone search authorization was narrowed to emails and text messages and was particular

The command authorization for a search of defendant’s iPhone was reasonable and limited to files of emails, text messages, and search history as to his extramarital affairs before and after his wife’s death. A video found in an email was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches, Particularity | Comments Off on N.-M.: Broad cellphone search authorization was narrowed to emails and text messages and was particular

Reason: A Fourth Amendment Mistake the Supreme Court Should Fix

Reason: A Fourth Amendment Mistake the Supreme Court Should Fix by Damon Root (“Don’t expand the “hot pursuit” exception to the Fourth Amendment.”)

Posted in Hot pursuit | Comments Off on Reason: A Fourth Amendment Mistake the Supreme Court Should Fix

CA8: Being a passenger in a stolen vehicle justifies a patdown for weapons

Defendant’s riding in a stolen car permits a patdown. “Further, to the extent Brooks argues questioning occurred before the frisk and exceeded the permissible scope of a Terry stop, we conclude that the officers were not required to give Miranda … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Being a passenger in a stolen vehicle justifies a patdown for weapons

D.Neb.: Roadside questioning in the patrol car doesn’t matter

“Also, the fact that Gardea was questioned in the patrol car is of no consequence. ‘An officer making a traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment by asking the driver his destination and purpose, checking the license and registration, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Roadside questioning in the patrol car doesn’t matter

New Law Review: The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation

Orin Kerr, The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation, forthcoming in the St. Louis University Law Journal. Abstract:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on New Law Review: The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation

W.D.Ky.: PC to arrest for a drug crime doesn’t require a completed crime

Probable cause for arrest because of planning to commit a drug crime based on corroborated CI information without the drug transaction even happening. United States v. Kristopher, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236421 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 16, 2020) [e.g., attempt, conspiracy]. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: PC to arrest for a drug crime doesn’t require a completed crime

TX: Flight from arrest on a warrant doesn’t permit litigating the validity of the warrant

There was an outstanding arrest warrant for defendant that justified the officer’s attempting to arrest him, and his flight justified his conviction for evading. The exclusionary rule doesn’t reach down to the actual validity of the warrant and the statute … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on TX: Flight from arrest on a warrant doesn’t permit litigating the validity of the warrant

NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage

NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage (“The video of the February 2019 raid shows police officers handcuffed a naked woman and searched her home for nearly an hour before realizing they raided the wrong … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NBC News: Bodycam footage of botched police raid in Chicago sparks outrage

CA11: Dist Ct acted within its discretion denying a suppression motion as untimely

Defense counsel waited past the pretrial motions deadline to file a motion to suppress complaining that he needed a state court transcript, but that hearing was long ago. The district court acted within its discretion in denying the motion for … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA11: Dist Ct acted within its discretion denying a suppression motion as untimely

OH5: Def’s large knife on his belt justified patdown for additional weapons

“We concur with the trial court that Officer Sholl had a sufficient reasonable objective basis under the totality of the circumstances to frisk appellant for weapons. Appellant had a large fixed blade knife on his belt loop. A pat down … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s large knife on his belt justified patdown for additional weapons

WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

Basic questions about where defendant and his passenger were going were reasonable to put their trip into “context.” That led to reasonable suspicion. Pryce v. State, 2020 WY 151, 2020 Wyo. LEXIS 178 (Dec. 16, 2020). (And one could ask: … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital Searches, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

DE: Actual presence of accused not required for suppression hearing and video appearance constitutional

A virtual suppression hearing that was a mixed question of law and fact didn’t require the actual presence of the accused under the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause, following United States v. Rosenschein, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129889 (D.N.M. July 23, … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DE: Actual presence of accused not required for suppression hearing and video appearance constitutional

N.D.Iowa: SW affidavit was sloppy and partly misleading, but not intentionally so

“A substantial basis existed for the court to determine probable cause existed on the face of the warrant affidavit.” It was, however, sloppy and partly misleading, but, on the totality there is no Franks violation. United States v. Johnson, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SW affidavit was sloppy and partly misleading, but not intentionally so

M.D.Fla.: Storage unit rental agreement consented to landlord entry

The rental agreement for defendant’s storage unit itself showed there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the unit if the landlord suspected unlawful or unsafe use. Here, there was a dog sniff outside the door. “Because Defendant consented to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Storage unit rental agreement consented to landlord entry

W.D.La.: Protective sweep for AK-47 was reasonable on knock-and-talk for weapon, denial of entry, and smelling MJ; one officer was to leave for SW

Police properly conducted a protective sweep for an AK-47 after a knock-and-talk did not gain entry. Police had an anonymous source, and defendant was an alleged felon in possession, and they went for a knock-and-talk. Defendant refused to consent, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Inevitable discovery, Knock and talk, Protective sweep, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Protective sweep for AK-47 was reasonable on knock-and-talk for weapon, denial of entry, and smelling MJ; one officer was to leave for SW

M.D.Pa.: Error in USPS tracking number of parcel in SW was a “mere technical error” when it was readily apparent they had right package

Error as to USPS tracking number in an anticipatory warrant wasn’t fatal and didn’t make the warrant not particular. All the other information was correct as to sender, recipient, description, and shipping location. This was a “mere technical error” that … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Error in USPS tracking number of parcel in SW was a “mere technical error” when it was readily apparent they had right package