Author Archives: Hall

CA3 notes inventory policy not in evidence supporting § 1983 judgment and affirms

In a Fourth Amendment § 1983 case tried to a jury, the claim of an unreasonable inventory search prevailed before the jury. Yet, there was no written policy put into evidence by the parties. Affirmed on this ground. Watley v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inventory, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3 notes inventory policy not in evidence supporting § 1983 judgment and affirms

NC: Trial court erred in not considering Brown factors in considering reasonableness of a checkpoint

“Defendant concedes and we agree that the trial court correctly determined that the checkpoint had a legitimate primary purpose. The trial court found that the purpose of the checkpoint was to check ‘each driver stopped for a valid driver’s license … Continue reading →

Posted in Chekpoints | Comments Off on NC: Trial court erred in not considering Brown factors in considering reasonableness of a checkpoint

E.D.Ky.: Def consented to search of car; request was “not … sufficiently coercive”

I see cases like this all time time, and it really happens. Clients admit it, and I’ve seen the video. But I’m not going to stop arguing they felt compelled to consent: “So, the question now before the court is … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def consented to search of car; request was “not … sufficiently coercive”

OH5: Entry into cell phone tower at night which was being serviced was without exigent circumstances

A police officer came upon a cell phone tower at night where the door was open and a car was parked outside. He could hear music inside. He came in and asked what was going on and saw a bong. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH5: Entry into cell phone tower at night which was being serviced was without exigent circumstances

NC: State statute on parole searches didn’t permit search of home, just the person

State statute authorized searches of the person or parolees, not places, and the search here exceeded the authority granted by statute, applying Samson v. California. State v. McCants, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 969 (Dec. 31, 2020). The search warrant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NC: State statute on parole searches didn’t permit search of home, just the person

NY3: Visitor at a party had no REP

Defendant was invited to a party at a vacant building loaned to a friend for purposes of the party. He wasn’t staying past the end of the party. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched. People … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on NY3: Visitor at a party had no REP

CA9: Putting key in a car door to locate right car violates Jones and Jardines

Prior case law on inserting a key in a car door is not a search is contrary to Jones and Jardines. As a parole search, however, it can be reasonable if the car is connected to the parolee. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Trespass | Comments Off on CA9: Putting key in a car door to locate right car violates Jones and Jardines

CA6: “Hey, man, I said come here” was still a consensual encounter

The district court’s finding of fact is not clearly erroneous. The officer said he said “please” and defendant said he said “Hey, man. … Hey, come here,” and when defendant continued to walk, the officer supposedly yelled, “Hey, man, I … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: “Hey, man, I said come here” was still a consensual encounter

NC: Mere visitor on the premises shouldn’t have been searched without articulatable RS

Defendant was a visitor on the premises when a search warrant was executed. A full search of his person was unreasonable because there were no facts shown justifying a belief he was armed or dangerous. The dissents view would hollow … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC: Mere visitor on the premises shouldn’t have been searched without articulatable RS

CA10: Heck bars excessive force claim where it attacks ptf’s guilty plea

“Heck bars Mr. Hooks from recovering damages based on the first four alleged uses of force. Mr. Hooks’s no contest plea to two counts of assault and battery of a police officer means he admitted repeatedly hitting the officers before … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Heck bars excessive force claim where it attacks ptf’s guilty plea

M.D.Pa.: Conduct shown in affidavit was “protracted” and it wasn’t stale

The search warrant wasn’t stale because the conduct under investigation was “protracted.” “Williams’ piecemeal approach to the facts of the affidavit fails to acknowledge that probable cause is a holistic, totality-of-the-circumstances assessment. … The age of some of the historical … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Conduct shown in affidavit was “protracted” and it wasn’t stale

OH5: “Request” to “come here” was not a seizure

Based on prior cases, the court finds this encounter was a consensual encounter. “We find that the Trooper’s request that appellant ‘come here’ did not turn the encounter into a seizure.” State v. Nichols, 2020-Ohio-6960, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4782 … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH5: “Request” to “come here” was not a seizure

FL1: ‘conduct does not need to be illegal (or acted upon if so) to be suspicious’ on the totality

“In fact, ‘conduct does not need to be illegal (or acted upon if so) to be suspicious.’ Weakley v. State, 273 So. 3d 283, 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (observing that in District of Columbia v. Wesby, 138 S. Ct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL1: ‘conduct does not need to be illegal (or acted upon if so) to be suspicious’ on the totality

NYTimes: Another Arrest, and Jail Time, Due to a Bad Facial Recognition Match

NYTimes: Another Arrest, and Jail Time, Due to a Bad Facial Recognition Match by Kashmir Hill (“Nijeer Parks is the third person known to be arrested for a crime he did not commit based on a bad face recognition match.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: Another Arrest, and Jail Time, Due to a Bad Facial Recognition Match

CA3: No REP in cell phone subscriber records

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in cell phone subscriber information such that a warrant is required to obtain it v. a subpoena duces tecum. United States v. Brooks, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40561 (3d Cir. Dec. 29, 2020). … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: No REP in cell phone subscriber records

OH3: When state appeals dismissal for pretrial delay, def can’t appeal denial of suppression motion

Denial of a motion to suppress is not immediately appealable in Ohio. Here, there was an appealable pretrial issue of a grant of dismissal for pretrial delay, and the court finds the suppression issue was still viable and could be … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH3: When state appeals dismissal for pretrial delay, def can’t appeal denial of suppression motion

CA8: “where one draws the line between” independent source and inevitable discovery doctrines “is unimportant”

“Although the distinction between the independent-source and inevitable-discovery doctrines is not sharp …, where exactly one draws the line between the two doctrines is unimportant.” United States v. Baez, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40551 (8th Cir. Dec. 29, 2020):

Posted in Independent source, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA8: “where one draws the line between” independent source and inevitable discovery doctrines “is unimportant”

CA9: The fact CBP had RS doesn’t mean it’s required for a border dog sniff

“The fact that Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officers had reasonable suspicion cannot serve to heighten the standard attached to the border search.” The use of a drug dog at the border doesn’t require reasonable suspicion. United States v. Meraz-Campos, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Border search, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: The fact CBP had RS doesn’t mean it’s required for a border dog sniff

N.D.Cal.: Failure to produce SW at scene of search doesn’t violate Rule 41 or 4A

Failure to produce a search warrant at the time of the search doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment or Rule 41. Also, the search was particular. “In our case, a San Francisco Superior Court issued the search warrant, which federal ATF … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Failure to produce SW at scene of search doesn’t violate Rule 41 or 4A

IL: Conversation with passenger while waiting for transport for arrested driver didn’t extend the stop

Defendant was a passenger in a car stopped for a seat belt violation. The driver had no DL and he was handcuffed. While waiting for transport of the driver, the arresting officer engaged him in conversation. This was reasonable and … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Conversation with passenger while waiting for transport for arrested driver didn’t extend the stop