Author Archives: Hall

OH8: Traffic offense overcomes pretext claim

An actual traffic offense overcomes defense claims the stop was actually a motive for searching for drugs. Defendant didn’t produce current proof of insurance, and that led to extension of the stop. The officer wasn’t just obliged to have noted … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pretext, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OH8: Traffic offense overcomes pretext claim

MD: RS on totality is way less than preponderance or prima facie case

Proof of the totality of circumstances of reasonable suspicion is less than a preponderance of the evidence or even a prima facie case. It depends a lot on “those who can read between the lines,” the investigating officers. Freeman v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: RS on totality is way less than preponderance or prima facie case

CA9: ICE warrant authorized knocking at appellant’s door, and co-occupant consented to entry

ICE officers could approach appellant’s door under Jardines with an immigration arrest warrant even though it is not a judicial warrant. “The immigration warrant licensed the officers to solicit consent to entry for the limited purpose of enforcing the civil … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: ICE warrant authorized knocking at appellant’s door, and co-occupant consented to entry

CA6: Search issue not decided because it’s harmless in light of other proof

While the suppression motion as to admissibility of seized cash probably should have been granted, it was harmless error in light of the proof of possession of heroin. United States v. Morton, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 2404 (6th Cir. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Search issue not decided because it’s harmless in light of other proof

WA: Raiding wrong house stated claim under state tort of negligent law enforcement

Police raided the wrong house based on an uncorroborated CI. Under Washington’s tort of negligent law enforcement, plaintiff was awared $250,000 by the jury. Affirmed: “we hold that police executing a search warrant owe the same duty of reasonable care … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: Raiding wrong house stated claim under state tort of negligent law enforcement

CO: Officer executing SW on Dropbox can authenticate the production at trial

When a search warrant is executed on a Dropbox account, the seizing officer’s knowledge of the seizure can authenticate the production. People v. Abad, 2021 COA 6, 2021 Colo. App. LEXIS 89 (Jan. 28, 2021). Franks offer fails: “The facts … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CO: Officer executing SW on Dropbox can authenticate the production at trial

CA9: Passenger also shot in effort to stop vehicle was seized under 4A; SJ denied on reasonableness of force

A vehicle passenger who was not intentionally targeted by the officers had a cognizable Fourth Amendment interest under Brower v. County of Inyo and Brendlin v. California. His freedom of movement was terminated when the officers intentionally shot at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Passenger also shot in effort to stop vehicle was seized under 4A; SJ denied on reasonableness of force

The Intercept: How The LAPD And Palantir Use Data To Justify Racist Policing

The Intercept: How The LAPD And Palantir Use Data To Justify Racist Policing by Mara Hvistendahl (“In a new book, a sociologist who spent months embedded with the LAPD details how data-driven policing techwashes bias.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: How The LAPD And Palantir Use Data To Justify Racist Policing

CA8: Officer wins two § 1983 cases in same day from E.D. Mo., Cape Girardeau

The officer had cause for defendant’s stop for a broken taillight and then found a warrant for his arrest. “Wood also alleges that after the fact, Wooten fabricated evidence about the arrest (and then invoked his Fifth Amendment right about … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Officer wins two § 1983 cases in same day from E.D. Mo., Cape Girardeau

E.D.Mich.: PC a close call, so GFE applies

“Ultimately, the Court need not decide which side of the Ramirez-Merriweather line [of probable cause] this case falls. It suffices to say that, especially because the search warrant affidavit makes no mention of any communications involving Jackson’s cell phone, it … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC a close call, so GFE applies

M.D.La.: Driveway here was not Curtilage “intimately tied to the home”

Defendant’s driveway was not Curtilage “intimately tied to the home.” United States v. Martinez-Velazquez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15723 (M.D. La. Jan. 28, 2021):

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Driveway here was not Curtilage “intimately tied to the home”

M.D.Tenn.: SW affiants should err on side of more information, not less

“[T]he warrant affidavit established probable cause to search the Residence, based on a combination of the smell of marijuana emanating from the Residence and the marijuana stem recovered in the trash pull. The affidavit reveals that three different MNPD officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: SW affiants should err on side of more information, not less

CA1: Defense must argue cost v. benefits of exclusionary rule or issue is likely waived

When invoking the exclusionary rule, the defendant necessarily has to show that the deterrence value of exclusion outweighs the costs of exclusion. United States v. Cruz-Ramos, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 2284 (1st Cir. Jan. 27, 2021), n. 9:

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA1: Defense must argue cost v. benefits of exclusionary rule or issue is likely waived

E.D.Wis.: No REP as to pole camera surveillance, one in an apt building hallway

Two surveillance cameras were installed; one on a pole, one in a hallway of an apartment building. Defendant, a visitor, had no reasonable expectation of privacy. A codefendant already litigated this motion and lost, and he should have acknowledged the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No REP as to pole camera surveillance, one in an apt building hallway

Pre-Carpenter CSLI was in good faith

The CSLI order here pre-dated Carpenter, and it was based on probable cause. Since Carpenter wasn’t retroactive, the motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Stamat, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14268 (D.Minn. Jan. 26, 2021).* Defendant’s CSLI was obtained … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Pre-Carpenter CSLI was in good faith

AR: Adding to PC argument on appeal wasn’t preserved

Defendant’s specific argument on appeal about the lack of probable cause was not presented to the trial court, so it’s not preserved for appeal. In a Franks part of the motion, the affidavit has to be read as a whole, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Adding to PC argument on appeal wasn’t preserved

CA4: Not every fact an affiant knows needs to go in a SW affidavit for Franks

The omission of some facts didn’t make out a Franks violation. Affiants for search warrants are not required to itemize every fact they know and omission of some, the nonmaterial, doesn’t make out a Franks violation nor undermine the probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: Not every fact an affiant knows needs to go in a SW affidavit for Franks

CA10: Officers’ mistake of fact here undermined the RS

The government conceded on appeal (as it should) that the officers alleged to have reasonable suspicion were mistaken as to what they testified to because they were misinformed. Taking this information out of the equation, the court finds that they … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Officers’ mistake of fact here undermined the RS

ABAJ: Immigration lawyer sues over seizure of his cellphone at airport

ABAJ: Immigration lawyer sues over seizure of his cellphone at airport by Debra Cassens Weiss (“Texas immigration lawyer Adam A. Malik has sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for seizing and retaining his iPhone when he returned to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on ABAJ: Immigration lawyer sues over seizure of his cellphone at airport

D.Minn.: Seeking “four corners review” of affidavit for SW isn’t a proper motion to suppress

A generalized motion to suppress merely seeking “four corners review” of probable cause is insufficient. “Defendant’s failure to specify the basis for his suppression motion and provide any argument in support thereof warrants denial alone.” “Defendant’s motion also fails because … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Seeking “four corners review” of affidavit for SW isn’t a proper motion to suppress