Author Archives: Hall

OH9: ‘A determination that reasonable suspicion exists, however, need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct. Terry accepts the risk that officers may stop innocent people.’”

“‘A determination that reasonable suspicion exists, however, need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct. Terry accepts the risk that officers may stop innocent people.’” State v. Kleintop, 2021-Ohio-3584, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 3493 (9th Dist. Oct. 6, 2021). … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH9: ‘A determination that reasonable suspicion exists, however, need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct. Terry accepts the risk that officers may stop innocent people.’”

W.D.N.Y.: Ongoing murder investigation with other SWs executed did not make this SW stale

Three weeks passed in a murder investigation between officers thinking they might have to search and getting the search warrant. Other search warrants were obtained in the interim, and the investigation was ongoing. The delay was reasonable. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Ongoing murder investigation with other SWs executed did not make this SW stale

CA6: Def counsel not ineffective for not challenging car search on curtilage from 2008 under Jardines and Collins

Defense counsel considered and chose not to file a motion to suppress. At the time (2008) the law was less clear than now about automobiles on the curtilage and computers in the car as a “container.” Jardines and Collins came … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: Def counsel not ineffective for not challenging car search on curtilage from 2008 under Jardines and Collins

D.Mass.: Court sua sponte reconsiders denial of Franks challenge and grants it

The court sua sponte reconsiders its prior denial of a motion to suppress for a Franks violation and grants it. The critical paragraph in the affidavit identifying defendant was clearly misstated. United States v. Hallman, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191780 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Court sua sponte reconsiders denial of Franks challenge and grants it

E.D.Pa.: Multitude of facts supports nexus of evidence of robbery to def’s home

“Based upon the magnitude of the facts described in the search warrant affidavit, the issuing judge was justified in drawing a reasonable inference that physical evidence of Defendant’s alleged robberies would be found at his home. Defendant’s charged crimes, two … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Multitude of facts supports nexus of evidence of robbery to def’s home

KY: Stop of a known druggy on the street was without RS

Two officers in two cars pulled up on defendant walking down the street with another known druggy. The officers and defendant knew each other because they’d arrested him before. The trial court did not err in finding this was a … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on KY: Stop of a known druggy on the street was without RS

E.D.N.Y.: 101 day delay in cell phone SW after seizure not 4A violation

The delay between the search and the seizure of defendant’s cell phones seized on his arrest was 101 days long, but, compared to the reduced privacy interest in the phone because of evidentiary value, it was not constitutionally unreasonable. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Knock and announce, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: 101 day delay in cell phone SW after seizure not 4A violation

ID: Drug dog’s nose through a car window before alerting is a search and a Jones trespass

A drug dog’s nose through a car window before alerting is a search and a Jones trespass. De minimis, yet, but still a trespass. There was no probable cause for the automobile exception, and the state waived standing by not … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Search, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog’s nose through a car window before alerting is a search and a Jones trespass

D.N.J.: Generalized “street tip” about defendant wasn’t RS

The street tip officers got was transmitted now third hand to the stopping officer. The tips were unremarkable about their credibility and weight. The court finds no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. United States v. Joyner, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Generalized “street tip” about defendant wasn’t RS

D.D.C.: Def abandoned a gun in flight up stairs in a house

Defendant fled up stairs when the police entered on a search warrant. He was captured finally on the third floor landing and was brought downstairs. A gun was found where he was lying on the floor. It was abandoned. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Foreign searches | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Def abandoned a gun in flight up stairs in a house

OH12: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to violations of statute unless it also violates 4A

A statutory violation is not subject to suppression unless it also shows a violation of the Constitution. “Suppression is a remedy only for a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which in turn, only requires that a search and seizure be … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Seizure | Comments Off on OH12: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to violations of statute unless it also violates 4A

M.D.Pa.: Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist

Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist. Some of the translations here were non-sensical. Alternatively, however, the search was valid under the automobile exception. United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist

OH1: Collective knowledge doesn’t require transmission of PC between officers

An undercover officer radioed a patrol officer to stop defendant for impeding traffic for blocking the street while talking car to car. When stopped, the patrol officer didn’t even know the reason for the stop nor where the offense occurred. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Collective knowledge | Comments Off on OH1: Collective knowledge doesn’t require transmission of PC between officers

LA1: No REP in an abandoned house

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in an abandoned house he was using, and the trial court erred in finding one. State v. Jackson, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 1354 (La. App. 1 Cir. Oct. 1, 2021). Articulable facts supported … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on LA1: No REP in an abandoned house

W.D.N.Y.: Mere allegation the private search was expanded fails; def has to show something

Defendant alleges that NCMEC or the police expanded a private search. “However, Defendant concedes that he has no knowledge or evidence that either NCMEC or the police expanded the scope of the Facebook search. … Therefore, Defendant cannot assert that … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Mere allegation the private search was expanded fails; def has to show something

VT: Pseudo welfare check cannot be a ruse for a plain view under Jardines under state constitution

A pseudo welfare check cannot be a ruse for a plain view under Jardines. Police officers entering defendant’s girlfriend’s yard under the guise of a welfare check over the normal access route were looking for and discovered a 9 mm … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on VT: Pseudo welfare check cannot be a ruse for a plain view under Jardines under state constitution

CA10: RS from excessive nervousness, air freshener, multiple cell phones, energy drinks and caffeinated beverages, unusual travel plans, and inconsistent statements about where he had been

“Like the district court, we ‘evaluate each of the factors supporting reasonable suspicion separately and in aggregate.’ … The following led Webb to believe Defendant might be engaged in criminal activity: (1) excessive nervousness; (2) the strong scent of air … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: RS from excessive nervousness, air freshener, multiple cell phones, energy drinks and caffeinated beverages, unusual travel plans, and inconsistent statements about where he had been

CA1: 5 am knock-and-talk violated Jardines

5 am knock-and-talk with repeated entries to the property and entreaties to get plaintiff to come out of the house violated the clearly established law of Jardines. French v. Merrill, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 29679 (1st Cir. Oct. 1, 2021):

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on CA1: 5 am knock-and-talk violated Jardines

CA1: Arrest for DV was with PC despite disputed self-defense claim

Plaintiff was arrested for domestic violence, asserting he was defending himself. When the state charges were dropped, he sued the officer. His version of the facts do not unequivocally support self-defense or defense of premises, so the officer gets qualified … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA1: Arrest for DV was with PC despite disputed self-defense claim

OH6: Smell of alcohol and glassy eyes at 4:30 am alone not RS

“Based on our case law and considering the totality of the circumstances, we cannot find that Kiefer had reasonable, articulable suspicion to administer field sobriety tests to Dye. Based on the evidence and testimony in the record, we are left … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH6: Smell of alcohol and glassy eyes at 4:30 am alone not RS