E.D.N.Y.: 101 day delay in cell phone SW after seizure not 4A violation

The delay between the search and the seizure of defendant’s cell phones seized on his arrest was 101 days long, but, compared to the reduced privacy interest in the phone because of evidentiary value, it was not constitutionally unreasonable. United States v. Corbett, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191323 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2021).

In concurring to an Anders opinion, a dissenting judge finds a failure to announce shown on bodycam video until after the officers were inside was enough to rebrief. State v. Robinson, 2021-NCCOA-533, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 531 (Oct. 5, 2021).*

The Fourth Amendment issue presented on appeal is not the same as the issue tried in the suppression motion, so it is waived. State v. Cox, 2021-NCCOA-551, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 550 (Oct. 5, 2021) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Knock and announce, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.