Author Archives: Hall

D.Idaho: USMs at EPA execution of administrative SW not unreasonable

The presence of U.S. Marshals helping execute an EPA administrative warrant did not make the search unreasonable. Ace Black Ranches v. United States EPA, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22284 (D.Idaho Feb. 4, 2022). Decedent’s shooting during an apparent child kidnapping … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Idaho: USMs at EPA execution of administrative SW not unreasonable

CA11: Computer searches as condition of supervised release for gun crime not plain error

The district court did not plainly err in allowing supervised release searches of defendant’s computer for a gun crime. U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3(d)(7). Under precedent, a search condition does not have to be specifically related to the crime. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Staleness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA11: Computer searches as condition of supervised release for gun crime not plain error

GA: Even if knock-and-talk was valid, expanding entry onto the curtilage wasn’t

The knock-and-talk here was reasonable in its inception, but the officer violated the curtilage by inspecting a car parked there. The state’s argument that reasonable suspicion permitted approaching the car was not raised below so it’s waived. “Furthermore, even if … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Even if knock-and-talk was valid, expanding entry onto the curtilage wasn’t

CA3: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing unless enhancing sentence was reason for the search

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing factors unless the illegal search was intended to enhance the sentence. United States v. Torres, 926 F.2d 321 (3d Cir. 1991). “[W]e refused to follow Verdugo in Torres because the facts in Torres … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA3: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing unless enhancing sentence was reason for the search

W.D.Mo.: Brady doesn’t apply to suppression motions in this circuit yet

Brady doesn’t apply here to impeachment information that could have been used to cross-examine the officer that only slightly would improve defendant’s chances on a motion he waived by pleading guilty. The law is split that Brady doesn’t apply to … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Brady doesn’t apply to suppression motions in this circuit yet

WaPo: U.S. Capitol Police rejects GOP congressman’s claim that check of his open office is illegal investigation

WaPo: U.S. Capitol Police rejects GOP congressman’s claim that check of his open office is illegal investigation (“Chief Tom Manger said a Capitol Police officer entered Rep. Troy E. Nehls’s office in November because the door was left ‘open and … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on WaPo: U.S. Capitol Police rejects GOP congressman’s claim that check of his open office is illegal investigation

MA: No REP in privacy settings on social media when def let undercover officer in

An officer sending defendant a SnapChat “friend” request which defendant accepted created no reasonable expectation of privacy in his SnapChat account. Thereafter, defendant posted a video of him with a firearm, and police looked for him and arrested him for … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on MA: No REP in privacy settings on social media when def let undercover officer in

S.D.Ohio: Officer’s reading a note during consent entry violated scope of consent

Defendant consented to an entry but the officer’s reading a note exceeded the scope of consent. That made the later search warrant based on that void. United States v. Genco, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21055 (S.D.Ohio Feb. 7, 2022). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Scope of search, Strip search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Officer’s reading a note during consent entry violated scope of consent

E.D.Cal.: State parole officer could give seized cell phone to HSI for search

Plaintiff on parole did not state a claim that his parole officer gave his multiple cell phone to HSI for search. Petersen v. Buyard, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20986 (E.D.Cal. Feb. 4, 2022). It is not an offense in Minnesota … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: State parole officer could give seized cell phone to HSI for search

WaPo: Opinion: The IRS should not make you scan your face to see your tax returns

WaPo: Opinion: The IRS should not make you scan your face to see your tax returns:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Opinion: The IRS should not make you scan your face to see your tax returns

Kerr: Katz as Originalism

Orin S. Kerr, Katz as Originalism, 71 Duke L. J. 1047 (2022). Abstract:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Kerr: Katz as Originalism

NY4: State fails to prove independent source for search after unlawful arrest

The search of defendant’s car was the product of an illegal arrest, and the state fails to prove the independent source doctrine applies. Here, it was argued to be a parole search. People v. Smith, 2022 NY Slip Op 00790, … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: State fails to prove independent source for search after unlawful arrest

D.Conn.: This drug case SW was broad but the attachments narrowed it enough

“The warrant here, although broad, did not lack particularity in terms of data to be searched. The warrant incorporated two attachments relevant to this inquiry. See Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 557-58 (2004) (establishing that a court may construe … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Conn.: This drug case SW was broad but the attachments narrowed it enough

D.Conn.: No REP in pole camera surveillance of def’s business’s front door

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in two months of pole camera surveillance of his business front door. Society would not recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy of what’s visible from the public street. United States v. Harry, 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Pole cameras, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Conn.: No REP in pole camera surveillance of def’s business’s front door

WaPo: Minneapolis suspends use of no-knock warrants as scrutiny of contentious police tactic mounts

WaPo: Minneapolis suspends use of no-knock warrants as scrutiny of contentious police tactic mounts by Kim Bellware:

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on WaPo: Minneapolis suspends use of no-knock warrants as scrutiny of contentious police tactic mounts

D.Minn.: When the CI has apparent inside information, corroboration of innocent details can be enough

“Here, the caller provided descriptive information regarding both Defendant and the gun that he was holding, as well as predictive information indicating that Defendant would be found at the apartment because he was seen running back inside there. ‘The information … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Minn.: When the CI has apparent inside information, corroboration of innocent details can be enough

NY4: One positive trash search “might be a fluke, two indicate a trend”

Based on an anonymous source, police did two trash pulls at defendant’s address. Quoting CA6: “‘While one search turning up [narcotics] in the trash might be a fluke, two indicate a trend. Whether it be a particularly large quantity of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NY4: One positive trash search “might be a fluke, two indicate a trend”

CA10: Tasing a fleeing suspect is the seizure

Defendant continued to flee when he was finally Tasered. Then he was seized. United States v. Jeffers, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 3131 (10th Cir. Feb. 3, 2022). Plaintiff complains that inmate porters came into his prison cell and went through … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Tasing a fleeing suspect is the seizure

CA2: RS of man menacing with a gun supported stop at gunpoint

“In this case, in which defendant Justin Patterson stands charged with one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the government appeals from an order … suppressing the charged firearm because it … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: RS of man menacing with a gun supported stop at gunpoint

CA10: The specifics of the bag on Greyhound Bus search weren’t raised below, so waived

The specifics of defendant’s argument that his bag was handled on a Greyhound Bus in Albuquerque weren’t raised in the district court. His expansion of the issue on appeal was waived. United States v. Fernandez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 3129 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: The specifics of the bag on Greyhound Bus search weren’t raised below, so waived