Author Archives: Hall

OR: Questioning motorist about tattoos unreasonably extended stop

A question to a motorist about tattoos during a stop because they might have been prison tattoos wasn’t shown to be related to officer safety and was thus unreasonable. “Here, the circuitous, propensity-based inquiry about defendant’s incarceration history was predicated … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Curtilage, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Questioning motorist about tattoos unreasonably extended stop

CA4: Search incident of bag unreasonable where def handcuffed behind back and face down

Search of defendant’s bag when he was handcuffed behind his back and lying face down was unreasonable because it was unreachable. United States v. Buster, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 4747 (4th Cir. Feb. 22, 2022). When omitted information is relied … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: Search incident of bag unreasonable where def handcuffed behind back and face down

E.D.Mo.: Covid delay in 48 hour McLaughlin rule not unreasonable

A 12 hour delay past the 48 hour McLaughlin rule for a finding of probable cause was not shown to be unreasonable because of Covid delays and the temporary shutdown of the St. Louis federal courthouse for cleaning. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Prison and jail searches, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Covid delay in 48 hour McLaughlin rule not unreasonable

S.D.Ill.: CPS seizing child from home can be a 4A claim

A governmental actor taking a child from the home is determined under the Fourth Amendment if substantive due process does not apply. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000, 1017-18 (7th Cir. 2000). H.P. v. Kelley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: CPS seizing child from home can be a 4A claim

S.D.N.Y.: Seizing a cell phone in plain view with PC for later SW is reasonable

“[T]he court must conclude that probable cause existed to seize Kurland’s phone at the time of his arrest and that the plain view exception permitted the government to seize it. To be sure: simply seeing a device in plain view … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Seizing a cell phone in plain view with PC for later SW is reasonable

Fourthamendment.com 19 years old today

It is also the 262d anniversary of the argument in Paxton’s case, something I note every year. Visiting the Old Boston State House and seeing the exhibit of the court argument will make an impression.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Fourthamendment.com 19 years old today

D.Conn.: Collective knowledge doctrine requires passing on some of the “knowledge”

Another officer stopping the defendant under the collective knowledge doctrine at least has to be informed of what the “knowledge” is that warrants the stop. Without it, no reasonable suspicion. United States v. Roman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30416 (D.Conn. … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Collective knowledge doctrine requires passing on some of the “knowledge”

CA9: Interstate truck driver had apparent authority to consent to search of package in truck

An Old Dominion truck driver had apparent authority to open a package consigned to him and his company to haul. He became suspicious it was contraband and called the police. They wouldn’t act without probable cause so the driver took … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA9: Interstate truck driver had apparent authority to consent to search of package in truck

E.D.Mich.: A Franks challenge based on omissions is a higher bar to clear

When a Franks challenge is based on omissions, the bar is higher. Here, defendant didn’t meet it. United States v. McCoy, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30230 (E.D.Mich. Feb. 18, 2022):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: A Franks challenge based on omissions is a higher bar to clear

Above the Law: Broken Tail Lights? You Should Get That Fixed, But Should You Get Pulled Over?

Above the Law: Broken Tail Lights? You Should Get That Fixed, But Should You Get Pulled Over? by Chris Williams (Feb. 22, 2022):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Above the Law: Broken Tail Lights? You Should Get That Fixed, But Should You Get Pulled Over?

SCOTUS denies cert in pole camera case

Bloomberg Law: Justices Decline to Hear Home Surveillance Privacy Case (Feb. 22, 2022), referring to United States v. Tuggle, 4 F.4th 505 (7th Cir. 2021)

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on SCOTUS denies cert in pole camera case

W.D.Pa.: SW for what turned out to be multiunit apts is suppressed, and no GFE

The multi-unit character of the property being searched under a warrant wasn’t immediately apparent to the officers, or so they said. The court doesn’t credit that because they knew defendant was in “apartment 3” on the third floor. Post-search follow-up … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for what turned out to be multiunit apts is suppressed, and no GFE

M.D.Fla.: GFE applies to warrant execution issues

Officers had a search warrant for the premises of a house, and an outbuilding off the curtilage was searched, too. “Defendant next argues that the officers exceeded the scope of the search warrant because the converted shed was outside of … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: GFE applies to warrant execution issues

IA: PC to search a car is not per se PC to search the driver; more is needed

Probable cause to search a car under the automobile exception does not automatically give probable cause to search the person of the driver. It depends on the facts. State v. Stevens, 2022 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 13 (Feb. 18, 2022). Temporarily … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on IA: PC to search a car is not per se PC to search the driver; more is needed

SD: Refusal to submit to DUI blood draw, itself an offense, could be instructed upon without violating 4A

Where refusal to submit to a DUI blood test is the offense and statute makes refusal to submit admissible, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment to instruct the jury on refusal. State v. Nelson, 2022 SD 12, 2022 S.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on SD: Refusal to submit to DUI blood draw, itself an offense, could be instructed upon without violating 4A

CA9: Civil 4A case requires showing of standing, too

Plaintiff’s failure to specify his standing for an alleged Fourth Amendment violation defeats his civil claim. Sanghvi v. County of San Bernardino, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 4335 (9th Cir. Feb. 17, 2022).* “Given the findings of fact at issue here, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: Civil 4A case requires showing of standing, too

N.D.Ind.: Typo in title of SW of no consequence at all

The fact the search warrant had a typo and was called “search warrant affidavit” is of no moment. It was obviously the warrant. The affidavit also showed plenty of probable cause. Boddie v. Morales, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29509 (N.D.Ind. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Typo in title of SW of no consequence at all

ID: If a motion to suppress is untimely, at least show good cause for the delay

The trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress as untimely without inquiring into possible good cause or excusable neglect for the delay where the defense offered nothing on that. Defendant stripping down and leaving his clothes … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: If a motion to suppress is untimely, at least show good cause for the delay

MA: ShotSpotter alert and officer’s observations were RS on totality

ShotSpotter alert received by a nearby officer in the early morning hours with his observations on the scene in a minute or so on the totality was reasonable suspicion. Commonwealth v. Ford, 2022 Mass. App. LEXIS 14 (Feb. 18, 2022):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on MA: ShotSpotter alert and officer’s observations were RS on totality

CA7: Officers not liable for search of wrong apartment in reliance on SW description

In a § 1983 case over a search of the wrong apartment, the affidavit for the search warrant could be relied upon in good faith. The mistake was negligent at best, and it didn’t support civil liability here. The officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Officers not liable for search of wrong apartment in reliance on SW description