Category Archives: Reasonableness

D.Haw.: The nature of Hawai’i being what it is, it was not unreasonable for Postal Inspectors to divert a package to Honolulu for search

Defendant was suspected of shipping meth from Oahu to Kauai, Hawai’i. He flew out one morning to Honolulu and was returning that night. Officers waited in the airport for his return. They had two warrants for his arrest. When he … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Haw.: The nature of Hawai’i being what it is, it was not unreasonable for Postal Inspectors to divert a package to Honolulu for search

CA2: Female inmate’s forced prison strip search for male guard to inspect genitalia stated a claim

Forced prison strip search of female inmate to have her genitalia inspected by a male guard stated a claim for relief on her Fourth Amendment claim. The inmate retained a limited right to bodily privacy, there were disputes of fact … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: Female inmate’s forced prison strip search for male guard to inspect genitalia stated a claim

D.D.C.: Police allowing hours-long exposure of ptf’s breasts stated 4A seizure claim that was clearly established

Plaintiff was involved in a bar brawl, and her shirt was torn and her breasts exposed. DC Metro police officers handcuffed her behind her back and took her to jail and failed to do anything to cover her breasts or … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Police allowing hours-long exposure of ptf’s breasts stated 4A seizure claim that was clearly established

CA8: Execution of white collar SW with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens wasn’t unreasonable

Execution of a white collar search warrant by officers of the SBA and IRS with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens blaring was not unreasonable as a matter of law. Policy required they be armed during the raid. While a couple … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Execution of white collar SW with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens wasn’t unreasonable

TN: Crime scene investigators arrived right behind the police to a shooting call; crime scene search was reasonable under Mincey

Police received a call to a shooting, and people at the scene were shouting “Officer Shaffer pulled into the driveway and blocked the car so that it could not leave. The driver of the car stopped, got out, and yelled … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TN: Crime scene investigators arrived right behind the police to a shooting call; crime scene search was reasonable under Mincey

OH5: Not unreasonable to deny passenger permission to retrieve purse before dog sniff of car

The smell of burning marijuana was probable cause for a car search. The officer’s refusal to let the passenger retrieve her purse from the car before the search did not violate the Fourth Amendment. State v. Eiler, 2016-Ohio-224, 2016 Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH5: Not unreasonable to deny passenger permission to retrieve purse before dog sniff of car

E.D.Tex.: Ulterior motive for stop irrelevant where there is objective cause

The stop had a factual basis for a traffic offense even though the officer omitted from his report that the real reason was the DEA requested him to come up with a reason. “That the officer may have had ulterior … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Ulterior motive for stop irrelevant where there is objective cause

CA6: SW for cell phone for video of def’s obstructing officer properly led to finding CP

Defendant was stopped by a police officer and became argumentative, and he refused to provide his license, insurance, and registration. He said he was attempting to record the officer on his cell phone but he was too busy with it … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: SW for cell phone for video of def’s obstructing officer properly led to finding CP

S.D.N.Y.: Mistake of law wasn’t reasonable and stop suppressed; Heien distinguished

Defendant was stopped because one taillight was dimmer than the other, but not burned out. The court finds the stop was unreasonable and not a mistake of law under Heien, and the motion to suppress is granted. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Mistake of law wasn’t reasonable and stop suppressed; Heien distinguished

N.D.Cal.: 55 day delay in getting cell phone SW didn’t matter because this was a supervised release revo proceeding, and the exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply

Defendant’s cell phone was seized in an arrest for loitering for pimping. After his probation officer went back and forth with the police, he declined to search it under defendant’s search condition, and 55 days elapsed, and a search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: 55 day delay in getting cell phone SW didn’t matter because this was a supervised release revo proceeding, and the exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply

CT: Keeping def’s knife because he was too drunk to be safe with it was reasonable; later he was discovered to have been in an assault with it

Defendant was first thought to be an assault victim, and the police took him home because he was intoxicated. He was asked about weapons on him, and he admitted to a knife, which he was relieved of, and it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CT: Keeping def’s knife because he was too drunk to be safe with it was reasonable; later he was discovered to have been in an assault with it

IL: When a stop is based on an “investigative alert,” the basis has to be shown to be reasonable; here, the state couldn’t

Defendant was stopped on an “investigative alert,” which would have been sufficient if there was reasonable suspicion under the collective knowledge doctrine. There was no showing of the basis for the alert, and the stop was thus without reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: When a stop is based on an “investigative alert,” the basis has to be shown to be reasonable; here, the state couldn’t

CA1: Asking when you can get your car back is not revocation of consent; here it took over 21 days to search defendant’s car

Defendant’s car was seized as evidence of what he claimed was a carjacking where guns were stolen out of his car. His wife was murdered around that time. The government believed that the carjacking was a ruse to coverup loss … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA1: Asking when you can get your car back is not revocation of consent; here it took over 21 days to search defendant’s car

S.D.N.Y.: “Under ordinary circumstances, drawing weapons and using handcuffs are not part of a Terry stop,” but the totality of the circumstances here justified it

“Under ordinary circumstances, drawing weapons and using handcuffs are not part of a Terry stop,” but the totality of the circumstances can justify it. Here, it did. Defendants were stopped on a rural road with reasonable suspicion. Although a frisk … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: “Under ordinary circumstances, drawing weapons and using handcuffs are not part of a Terry stop,” but the totality of the circumstances here justified it

NJ: SW for def’s person made it reasonable to frisk him them move him elsewhere for the search of the person

Officers had a warrant to search defendant’s person and house. When they found him, they conducted a patdown and then moved him elsewhere for the more intrusive search. The second search was objectively reasonable under the warrant, and moving him … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Search | Comments Off on NJ: SW for def’s person made it reasonable to frisk him them move him elsewhere for the search of the person

Two on Rodriguez and extended stops

The stop of defendant’s vehicle was extended for a dog sniff. The defense argued that it was unreasonable, and the trial court found it was de minimus. Rodriguez was then decided, and it applies. The dog sniff occurred after defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on Two on Rodriguez and extended stops

DC: Warrantless anal cavity search in courthouse cellblock not shown to be reasonable

The government failed to carry its burden that the anal cavity search of defendant in a courthouse cellblock was reasonable without the use of medical personnel. They may not always be required, but they may be, and what case law … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DC: Warrantless anal cavity search in courthouse cellblock not shown to be reasonable

GA: Overlong stop was reasonable here because officer was dealing with two cars

Defendant was not seized, although the stop was long. There was another driver in another car also being dealt with, and the officer had to get another to the scene. Defendant was never told he was under arrest, nor was … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Overlong stop was reasonable here because officer was dealing with two cars

IN: Officer’s stop for no paper license except in rear window was unreasonable because it was now lawful to have it there

State law had changed a year before defendant’s stop to allow for temporary plates to be hung in the rear window. Defendant was stopped for no license plate. As the officer approached, he could see a plate in the rear … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Officer’s stop for no paper license except in rear window was unreasonable because it was now lawful to have it there

NY3: It’s not IAC to not listen to the audio of the SW application where there was a motion to suppress for lack of PC

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not listening to the audio of the oral application for the search warrant challenging probable cause. The defense moved to suppress on lack of PC, and it was denied by the trial court and … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NY3: It’s not IAC to not listen to the audio of the SW application where there was a motion to suppress for lack of PC