Category Archives: Reasonableness

S.D.N.Y.: Mistake of law wasn’t reasonable and stop suppressed; Heien distinguished

Defendant was stopped because one taillight was dimmer than the other, but not burned out. The court finds the stop was unreasonable and not a mistake of law under Heien, and the motion to suppress is granted. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Mistake of law wasn’t reasonable and stop suppressed; Heien distinguished

N.D.Cal.: 55 day delay in getting cell phone SW didn’t matter because this was a supervised release revo proceeding, and the exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply

Defendant’s cell phone was seized in an arrest for loitering for pimping. After his probation officer went back and forth with the police, he declined to search it under defendant’s search condition, and 55 days elapsed, and a search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: 55 day delay in getting cell phone SW didn’t matter because this was a supervised release revo proceeding, and the exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply

CT: Keeping def’s knife because he was too drunk to be safe with it was reasonable; later he was discovered to have been in an assault with it

Defendant was first thought to be an assault victim, and the police took him home because he was intoxicated. He was asked about weapons on him, and he admitted to a knife, which he was relieved of, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CT: Keeping def’s knife because he was too drunk to be safe with it was reasonable; later he was discovered to have been in an assault with it

IL: When a stop is based on an “investigative alert,” the basis has to be shown to be reasonable; here, the state couldn’t

Defendant was stopped on an “investigative alert,” which would have been sufficient if there was reasonable suspicion under the collective knowledge doctrine. There was no showing of the basis for the alert, and the stop was thus without reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: When a stop is based on an “investigative alert,” the basis has to be shown to be reasonable; here, the state couldn’t

CA1: Asking when you can get your car back is not revocation of consent; here it took over 21 days to search defendant’s car

Defendant’s car was seized as evidence of what he claimed was a carjacking where guns were stolen out of his car. His wife was murdered around that time. The government believed that the carjacking was a ruse to coverup loss … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA1: Asking when you can get your car back is not revocation of consent; here it took over 21 days to search defendant’s car

S.D.N.Y.: “Under ordinary circumstances, drawing weapons and using handcuffs are not part of a Terry stop,” but the totality of the circumstances here justified it

“Under ordinary circumstances, drawing weapons and using handcuffs are not part of a Terry stop,” but the totality of the circumstances can justify it. Here, it did. Defendants were stopped on a rural road with reasonable suspicion. Although a frisk … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: “Under ordinary circumstances, drawing weapons and using handcuffs are not part of a Terry stop,” but the totality of the circumstances here justified it

NJ: SW for def’s person made it reasonable to frisk him them move him elsewhere for the search of the person

Officers had a warrant to search defendant’s person and house. When they found him, they conducted a patdown and then moved him elsewhere for the more intrusive search. The second search was objectively reasonable under the warrant, and moving him … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Search | Comments Off on NJ: SW for def’s person made it reasonable to frisk him them move him elsewhere for the search of the person

Two on Rodriguez and extended stops

The stop of defendant’s vehicle was extended for a dog sniff. The defense argued that it was unreasonable, and the trial court found it was de minimus. Rodriguez was then decided, and it applies. The dog sniff occurred after defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on Two on Rodriguez and extended stops

DC: Warrantless anal cavity search in courthouse cellblock not shown to be reasonable

The government failed to carry its burden that the anal cavity search of defendant in a courthouse cellblock was reasonable without the use of medical personnel. They may not always be required, but they may be, and what case law … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DC: Warrantless anal cavity search in courthouse cellblock not shown to be reasonable

GA: Overlong stop was reasonable here because officer was dealing with two cars

Defendant was not seized, although the stop was long. There was another driver in another car also being dealt with, and the officer had to get another to the scene. Defendant was never told he was under arrest, nor was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Overlong stop was reasonable here because officer was dealing with two cars

IN: Officer’s stop for no paper license except in rear window was unreasonable because it was now lawful to have it there

State law had changed a year before defendant’s stop to allow for temporary plates to be hung in the rear window. Defendant was stopped for no license plate. As the officer approached, he could see a plate in the rear … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Officer’s stop for no paper license except in rear window was unreasonable because it was now lawful to have it there

NY3: It’s not IAC to not listen to the audio of the SW application where there was a motion to suppress for lack of PC

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not listening to the audio of the oral application for the search warrant challenging probable cause. The defense moved to suppress on lack of PC, and it was denied by the trial court and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NY3: It’s not IAC to not listen to the audio of the SW application where there was a motion to suppress for lack of PC

GA: If the dog sniff comes before dispatch reports back on the DL check, the dog sniff is valid (4-3)

A dog sniff of a car while waiting for the driver’s and passenger’s DL info to come back did not in any way extend the stop, so it’s valid. (4-3) State v. Allen, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 789 (Nov. 2, 2015), … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on GA: If the dog sniff comes before dispatch reports back on the DL check, the dog sniff is valid (4-3)

M.D.Tenn.: “[D]etermining when a traffic stop has been completed, or reasonably should have been completed, can be complicated”

Reconsideration was sought under Rodriguez, and the court finds that defendant consented to the search before the stop became too long. United States v. Hendrix, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146860 (M.D.Tenn. Oct. 29, 2015):

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: “[D]etermining when a traffic stop has been completed, or reasonably should have been completed, can be complicated”

New Law Review Article: Wayne A. Logan, Cutting Cops Too Much Slack

Wayne A. Logan, Cutting Cops Too Much Slack, 104 Georgetown L.J. 87 (2015): Police officers can make mistakes, which, for better or worse, the U.S. Supreme Court has often seen fit to forgive. Police, for instance, can make mistakes of … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Wayne A. Logan, Cutting Cops Too Much Slack

Cal.1: Juvenile probation order to disclose all electronic passwords was overbroad

Juvenile probation order to disclose all electronic passwords was overbroad, following other recent cases. In re Ricardo P., 2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 931 (1st Dist. Oct. 22, 2015):

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.1: Juvenile probation order to disclose all electronic passwords was overbroad

NM: Police helicopter flyover at 50-100′ disrupted and damaged the property and scared the occupants and violated curtilage

A police helicopter flyover at 50-100′ disrupted and damaged the property and scared the occupants. Therefore, it violated the curtilage under the Fourth Amendment. Thus, the state constitutional issue does not have to be decided. State v. Davis, 2015 N.M. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NM: Police helicopter flyover at 50-100′ disrupted and damaged the property and scared the occupants and violated curtilage

N.D.N.Y.: Violation of Rule 41 in delay in searching cell phone doesn’t require suppression

The government obtained a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone and seized it promptly. The forensic search of the phone, however, didn’t occur for 85 days, after the 60 day window in the warrant. The defense, however, can show no … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Violation of Rule 41 in delay in searching cell phone doesn’t require suppression

Cal.4: Dispatch told officer that def was on probation for one crime, but it actually had expired; he was, however, on probation for something else; GFE applied

The officer here responded to a suspicious activity report and found a stolen trailer in defendant’s yard with a piece of pipe on it. He inquired of dispatch and was told defendant was on probation for brandishing a weapon. He … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.4: Dispatch told officer that def was on probation for one crime, but it actually had expired; he was, however, on probation for something else; GFE applied

OR automobile exception requires vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime

To justify the automobile exception in Oregon, the vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime. If parked, a warrant must be sought. State v. Belander, 274 Ore. App. 167, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1175 (September … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OR automobile exception requires vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime