Category Archives: Reasonableness

S.D.Ohio declines to wait for Microsoft to be decided and issues SW for gmail in another country

The government has applied for a Google search warrant stored overseas. Rather than wait for United States v. Microsoft to be decided, the court reviewed all the briefing in that case and decides that the search warrant will issue. In … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio declines to wait for Microsoft to be decided and issues SW for gmail in another country

techdirt: Appeals Court: Handcuffing A Compliant Ten-Year-Old Is Unreasonable But Deputy Had No Way Of Knowing That

techdirt: Appeals Court: Handcuffing A Compliant Ten-Year-Old Is Unreasonable But Deputy Had No Way Of Knowing That by Tim Cushing: Time and time again, courts remind officers of the law don’t actually have to know the law to enforce the … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on techdirt: Appeals Court: Handcuffing A Compliant Ten-Year-Old Is Unreasonable But Deputy Had No Way Of Knowing That

GA: Where no violation of clear statute, no Heien reasonable mistake of law defense for state

Defendant did not violate the traffic statute that the officer stopped him for. Therefore, Heien’s reasonable mistake of law and good faith doesn’t apply. Moreover, there is no good faith exception in Georgia. Harris v. State, 2018 Ga. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on GA: Where no violation of clear statute, no Heien reasonable mistake of law defense for state

MA: Two detectives joining into a traffic stop didn’t make it unreasonable or extend it

The stop was for a traffic offense, and two detectives stopped to participate. Their questions about smelling marijuana didn’t unreasonably extend the stop. Commonwealth v. Buckley, 2018 Mass. LEXIS 87 (Feb. 14, 2018):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MA: Two detectives joining into a traffic stop didn’t make it unreasonable or extend it

Cal.4th: No statutory or inherent authority for a court to impose a search condition as a condition of bail

There is no statutory or inherent authority for a court to impose a search condition as a condition of bail. The defendant is still presumed innocent and still has a reasonable expectation of privacy. In re Webb, 2018 Cal. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.4th: No statutory or inherent authority for a court to impose a search condition as a condition of bail

ACLU: Does a US Warrant Extend to Data Held Abroad?

ACLU: Does a US Warrant Extend to Data Held Abroad? by Jennifer Stisa Granick: When the government wants a company in the United States to turn over private data stored in another country, which country’s laws apply? The Supreme Court … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on ACLU: Does a US Warrant Extend to Data Held Abroad?

NJ: Misapplication of statute to make stop means stop is bad; Heien not yet applied in NJ

The law requires a working taillight. Defendant had one. “The officer’s erroneous application of the functioning taillight requirement was not an objectively reasonable mistake of law.” Therefore, Heien and the objectively reasonable mistake of law doesn’t apply here. The court, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NJ: Misapplication of statute to make stop means stop is bad; Heien not yet applied in NJ

CA1: Exclusionary rule as to a statement won’t be applied to military disciplinary review board case

In a military disciplinary case, the court holds that a statement obtained without warnings could still be used before a disciplinary review board because the exclusionary rule is disfavored. Sasen v. Spencer, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 517 (1st Cir. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA1: Exclusionary rule as to a statement won’t be applied to military disciplinary review board case

NC: Officer’s reasonable but mistaken belief that def’s picture was in a database of wanted persons made the arrest valid

The officer’s reasonable but mistaken belief that defendant’s picture was in a database of wanted persons made the arrest valid. “Additionally, the seizure of a person based on a reasonable mistake as to that person’s identity is constitutional. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC: Officer’s reasonable but mistaken belief that def’s picture was in a database of wanted persons made the arrest valid

N.D.Iowa: Officer’s slow walking issuance of ticket to allow drug dog time to arrive wasn’t objectively unreasonable

The officer’s subjective intent to delay the processing of defendant’s speeding ticket didn’t show that it was objectively slowed down to give time to get a drug dog to the scene to conduct a car sniff before the finishing of … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Officer’s slow walking issuance of ticket to allow drug dog time to arrive wasn’t objectively unreasonable

A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: AFOSI form that said cell phone consent search would be done in 3 days wasn’t constitutionally binding

An AFOSI form states that a cell phone search has to occur within three days of their acquiring the phone. The court in the past has suggested that form change because it’s unreasonable to expect that it can be done … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: AFOSI form that said cell phone consent search would be done in 3 days wasn’t constitutionally binding

E.D.La.: Not filing motion to suppress but joining in codef’s renewed motion to suppress was waiver

Where one defendant didn’t file a motion to suppress but joined in a renewed motion to suppress of a codefendant, the motion is treated as waived. The procedure attempted circumvents Rule 12. Moreover, he doesn’t even have standing. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Motion to suppress, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Not filing motion to suppress but joining in codef’s renewed motion to suppress was waiver

N.D.Ind.: State court GPS tracking order limited to Indiana didn’t prevent FBI from using it under 4A when car went to California

Defendant was suspected of a bank robbery, and the government presented a GPS tracking warrant affidavit to an Indiana judge to track defendant in Indiana. Shortly thereafter, defendant drove to Los Angeles, and he was stopped for a traffic offense … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: State court GPS tracking order limited to Indiana didn’t prevent FBI from using it under 4A when car went to California

MA: Search of vehicle outside territorial jurisdiction of officers was void; inevitable discovery rejected

The informant hearsay satisfied Aguilar-Spinneli and thus showed probable cause. The search incident of defendant’s person was thus justified. The search of a car in an adjoining town was unreasonable because there was no statutory authorization for it under state … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on MA: Search of vehicle outside territorial jurisdiction of officers was void; inevitable discovery rejected

CA4: Officer who obtained court order for minor ptf to be detained and to get an erection so police could photograph it gets no QI; this isn’t remotely reasonable

Plaintiff was a 17 year old that allegedly sent a picture of his erection to his 15 year old girlfriend. Defendant obtained a court order for plaintiff to be transported to a juvenile detention center to masturbate to get an … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Body searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Officer who obtained court order for minor ptf to be detained and to get an erection so police could photograph it gets no QI; this isn’t remotely reasonable

S.D.Ill.: Scope and meaning of consent form determined by objective reasonableness

It was objectively reasonable for officers to believe that the consent form defendant signed applied to the apartment searched. There were two buildings on the property, and he was in an apartment with a different mailing address. The consent form … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Scope and meaning of consent form determined by objective reasonableness

D.Kan.: State law does apply under 4A in parole searches; here, there was a reasonable basis for it

In the Tenth Circuit, the area of state probation and parole search is about the only area where the Fourth Amendment is informed by state law, and state law determines limits on state actors in the first instance, and then … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Kan.: State law does apply under 4A in parole searches; here, there was a reasonable basis for it

W.D.Mo.: Misreading a “hot sheet” for stop of a car was objectively reasonable mistake

Police had a “hot sheet,” a list of stolen cars from a car dealership, and were on the look out. “In this case, Officer Palmer believed that the red Dodge Challenger had been stolen from the dealership in Excelsior Springs, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Misreading a “hot sheet” for stop of a car was objectively reasonable mistake

GA: Reasonable mistake of law doesn’t mean “good working order” statute requires an interior mirror on a truck; nothing at all in statute on that

The reasonable mistake of law field encounters a new one: Does a truck have to have an inside rearview mirror when under the “good working order” statute? No, and concluding otherwise is not reasonable. The statute doesn’t even come close. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on GA: Reasonable mistake of law doesn’t mean “good working order” statute requires an interior mirror on a truck; nothing at all in statute on that

CA5: Witness to police shooting handcuffed and detained for 2 hours stated 4A claim for relief

Plaintiff’s father was acting erratic and was armed, and the police were called. Plaintiff was trying to defuse the situation. The SWAT team showed up, and, after a brief stand-off plaintiff’s father was shot while she was standing next to … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Witness to police shooting handcuffed and detained for 2 hours stated 4A claim for relief