Category Archives: Reasonableness

PA: DUI with agg. assault was sufficiently exigent to dispense with SW for BAC

Defendant was accused of DUI and aggravated assault, and the officer decided that the additional complexity of investigating the assault charge made a warrantless blood draw exigent. It didn’t matter that the state charged him with the assault two months … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on PA: DUI with agg. assault was sufficiently exigent to dispense with SW for BAC

S.D.Tex.: Inevitable discovery by inevitable SW obviated dispute over consent

Inevitable discovery also supports the consent search of defendant’s cell phone obtained at the Sarita, Texas checkpoint. The officers had probable cause and told him they’d get a search warrant and he consented instead. The matter was clearly under active … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Inevitable discovery by inevitable SW obviated dispute over consent

AZ: Even if NCMEC was not private actor, it didn’t expand the prior private search

In Arizona, Fourth Amendment claims are decided first, then state constitutional claims. Google+, acting completely on its own, searched defendant’s photos folder stored with there. Moreover, it was only shown to be protecting its private business interests, not aid the … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on AZ: Even if NCMEC was not private actor, it didn’t expand the prior private search

KS: Officer’s two calls to dispatch telling him there was a warrant was reasonable under Herring

Defendant’s arrest based on the officer’s two calls to dispatch insisting there was a warrant for defendant was reasonable reliance on a mistake of another under Herring. State v. Gilliland, 2021 Kan. App. LEXIS 21 (May 14, 2021). The French … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KS: Officer’s two calls to dispatch telling him there was a warrant was reasonable under Herring

D.Kan.: Stop and detention wasn’t unreasonable, at least in part, because the officer was maskless.

The stop and search of defendant’s person was not constitutionally unreasonable, including the fact the officer wasn’t wearing a mask. United States v. Wright, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83603 (D. Kan. Apr. 30, 2021). Defendant’s submissions in this excessive force … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Stop and detention wasn’t unreasonable, at least in part, because the officer was maskless.

AR: One can’t change 4A argument from trial court to appeal

Defendant’s oral motion to suppress was presented and denied. On appeal, defendant changed the specifics of the argument, and it’s not considered as presented. Saffel v. State, 2021 Ark. App. LEXIS 176 (Apr. 14, 2021). The officer’s stop of defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on AR: One can’t change 4A argument from trial court to appeal

S.D.W.Va.: Single question about possession of firearm reasonable under Rodriguez

Defendant was stopped for riding a bicycle with no helmet. The single question about possessing firearms didn’t unreasonably extend the stop. “Because the question asked here, whether Defendant had any firearms, is perhaps the most basic of inquiries related to … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Single question about possession of firearm reasonable under Rodriguez

CA11: Stop for not having license on bicycle in violation of city code was reasonable

The officer’s stop of defendant for not having a license on his bike per local ordinance was reasonable. Defendant’s flight justified his detention and seizure of his backpack. CoA denied. Thomas v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Stop for not having license on bicycle in violation of city code was reasonable

W.D.Tex.Bankr.: 4A does not extend to civil discovery requests

Posts to a “secret” Facebook group weren’t protected by any reasonable privacy interest in civil litigation. Social media isn’t protected by any privacy interest. “Defendant does not cite, and the Court could not find, any case that extends the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.Bankr.: 4A does not extend to civil discovery requests

ND: Warrantless entry of child protective services to remove a child was unreasonable

State child services officers came to defendant’s door to take her child away. She refused and ran back into the house with officers in pursuit. This warrantless entry and a second entry to collect clothes for the child were unreasonable. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on ND: Warrantless entry of child protective services to remove a child was unreasonable

DE: Exclusionary rule not designed to prohibit extra-territorial GPS tracking with warrant

In this post-conviction case, defense counsel didn’t raise the question of extraterritorial monitoring of a warrant installed GPS device. It was installed in 2015 [post-Jones] to track defendant who was an accomplished [except for getting caught] burglar. The court doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonableness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on DE: Exclusionary rule not designed to prohibit extra-territorial GPS tracking with warrant

E.D.Wis.: 25 min. wait for tint meter was related to stop and didn’t unreasonably extend it

A 25 minute wait for a tint meter to arrive at the scene of the stop was directly related to the purpose of the traffic stop: overtinted windows. “Johnson acknowledges that the police officers lawfully stopped him. A person who … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: 25 min. wait for tint meter was related to stop and didn’t unreasonably extend it

W.D.Ark.: Officer acting outside his local jurisdiction isn’t 4A issue

“Mr. van Leeuwen also claims that Boone County officers were without jurisdiction when they arrested him in his Marion County home, in alleged violation of Arkansas Code § 14-15-501. However, ‘[a] police violation of state law does not establish a … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Officer acting outside his local jurisdiction isn’t 4A issue

FL1: Sheriff’s Office failed to show TV and PlayStation were lawfully seized during drug search

The Bay County SO executed a drug search warrant at claimant’s father’s house and seized a flat screen TV and PlayStation. Claimant sought return, and the state claimed it was lawfully taken and became county property by operation of law. … Continue reading

Posted in Overseizure, Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on FL1: Sheriff’s Office failed to show TV and PlayStation were lawfully seized during drug search

C.D.Ill.: Prison strip searches are always permitted, unless done unreasonably

Inmates seen naked in prison is not a constitutional claim unless it was all done in an unreasonable manner. The limited facts here fail to show that. Danuk v. Downey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45383 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 11, 2021):

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Prison strip searches are always permitted, unless done unreasonably

WA: Uncorroborated CI’s story not RS or PC

CI was not shown to be sufficiently reliable by an attempt to corroborate her to justify defendant’s stop and subsequent search. “Unlike a citizen informant calling 911, a criminal informant is not presumed to be acting out of civic responsibility. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on WA: Uncorroborated CI’s story not RS or PC

D.N.M.: A vehicle could be stopped just because there was a warrant on the passenger

A vehicle could be stopped just because there was a warrant on the passenger. Here, ICE made the stop, and it was reasonably related to its justification. United States v. Murillo-Gonzalez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38494 (D. N.M. Mar. 1, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: A vehicle could be stopped just because there was a warrant on the passenger

OH12: State’s “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for stop has to be raised in trial court first

The state didn’t rely on a “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for the stop in the trial court, so it can’t for appeal. State v. Turner, 2021-Ohio-541, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 564 (12th Dist. Mar. 1, 2021). Defendant had some … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: State’s “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for stop has to be raised in trial court first

N.D.Ind.: Officer’s having to radio in information for wants and warrants check didn’t unreasonably extend stop

The officer observed defendant swerve over the double yellow line and made a stop to issue a warning. A dog was called and arrived in ten minutes. The stop took longer than normal because the officer had to go “old … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Officer’s having to radio in information for wants and warrants check didn’t unreasonably extend stop

FL5: Valid stop can be based on mistaken facts and still be reasonable

The question for validity of a stop is probable cause, not the defendant’s ultimate guilt. Fourth Amendment reasonableness allows for reasonable mistakes of fact. The trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress where the stop was still reasonable. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL5: Valid stop can be based on mistaken facts and still be reasonable