Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

E.D.Pa.: Length of def’s participation in DTO undermines his staleness argument

There was probable cause defendant was a major player in a DTO, and that his participation went on for months. This, he concedes, undermines his staleness argument. United States v. Williams, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211403 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Length of def’s participation in DTO undermines his staleness argument

N.D.Ind.: Parole search waiver applies to CSLI information

CSLI can be obtained from a parolee’s cell phone without a search warrant. “However, the Court’s own research has found that every circuit court faced with the same question has sided with the Government and found that a warrant is … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Parole search waiver applies to CSLI information

ID: Unlawful warrantless search isn’t salvageable by inevitable discovery by later learning of probation search waiver

A unreasonable warrantless search is not cured by inevitable discovery because the officers later find out defendant was on probation and had a search waiver on file. State v. Maxim, 2019 Ida. LEXIS 216 (Dec. 4, 2019):

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ID: Unlawful warrantless search isn’t salvageable by inevitable discovery by later learning of probation search waiver

E.D.Pa.: Def could be transported to precinct for lineup on RS alone

Defendant was handcuffed as a part of his stop for officer safety and to secure the scene. They could also put him in a police car handcuffed. Finally, transporting him to the precinct for a lineup wasn’t an unreasonable seizure … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def could be transported to precinct for lineup on RS alone

N.D.Iowa: “[T]he mere fact that the agents requested that Defendant sign a consent form does not suggest that he was in custody” for Miranda

“[T]he mere fact that the agents requested that Defendant sign a consent form does not suggest that he was in custody” for Miranda purposes. United States v. Cox, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206681 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 10, 2019), adopted, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: “[T]he mere fact that the agents requested that Defendant sign a consent form does not suggest that he was in custody” for Miranda

FL follows Mitchell on blood draws from the unconscious

The Florida Supreme Court granted a certified question of public importance on whether a search warrant was required to draw blood from an unconscious motorist in the hospital. In the meantime, SCOTUS decided Mitchell v. Wisconsin. This court applies Mitchell … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on FL follows Mitchell on blood draws from the unconscious

OH11: Failure to provide an inventory after a search is ministerial and not a fundamental right

“Even presuming no inventory was completed or provided to Thompson, however, this did not result in prejudice or provide any grounds for relief. It has been held that ‘the preparation and return of an inventory is ministerial’ and ‘does not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH11: Failure to provide an inventory after a search is ministerial and not a fundamental right

CA9: Three-month-old information about where probationer lived wasn’t stale for probation search

Probation officers could rely on a three-month-old list that showed defendant’s brother lived there and he was on probation. The list was not stale because there was no suggestion the brother’s tenancy was transitory. Defendant’s claim the probation search as … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Mail and packages, Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on CA9: Three-month-old information about where probationer lived wasn’t stale for probation search

WI: Uncorroborated informant hearsay was strong enough to credit for probation search on RS

Wisconsin permits warrantless probation and parole searches on reasonable suspicion by any law enforcement officer. Officers had it here based on uncorroborated informant hearsay. The record also supports the trial court’s conclusion that the officer knew of the search condition … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WI: Uncorroborated informant hearsay was strong enough to credit for probation search on RS

D.Kan.: Michigan v. Long search of car on RS for a weapon called “protective sweep”

The officers had reasonable suspicion to believe there was a weapon in the car justifying a “protective sweep” of the car under Michigan v. Long. United States v. Alexander, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197653 (D. Kan. Nov. 14, 2019). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Michigan v. Long search of car on RS for a weapon called “protective sweep”

D.Utah: Parole search doesn’t extend to car parolee was a passenger in

The parole search of car defendant was a passenger in was invalid because it wasn’t his. United States v. Tafuna, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194829 (D.Utah Oct. 1, 2019):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Utah: Parole search doesn’t extend to car parolee was a passenger in

MT: Welfare check of driver gave no indication of DUI, so no RS

The officer approached defendant’s vehicle pursuant to a 911 call to request a welfare check on the driver, but he did not have particularized suspicion to conduct a DUI investigation at the time he was assured defendant was not in … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on MT: Welfare check of driver gave no indication of DUI, so no RS

CA3: State law required RS for a parole search

Defendant was a parolee, and the parties argued over whether no suspicion was required for a parole search or reasonable suspicion. The government argued no suspicion required. The parole conditions didn’t specify, but state statute did, and reasonable suspicion is … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA3: State law required RS for a parole search

CA4: Probation search not unreasonable because a law enforcement task force was involved

Defendant argues the state probation search agreement (“his probation officer”) rather than the statute’s provision that he was generally subject to search was not controlling. The court disagrees: The statute controls and it’s clear. The fact a law enforcement task … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: Probation search not unreasonable because a law enforcement task force was involved

S.D.Ind.: Stalking horse rationale for PO’s cover for LEOs in search not universally accepted, and there was RS for this search anyway

Analyzing all the probation and parole search cases, the court finds defendant’s claim that probation was really a “stalking horse” for ATF unavailing. He had a reduced expectation of privacy and that there was reasonable suspicion for the search in … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Stalking horse rationale for PO’s cover for LEOs in search not universally accepted, and there was RS for this search anyway

LA4: Nervousness and furtiveness of person clutching bag on Bourbon St during Halloween crowd justified stop to check for weapons

It was Halloween on Bourbon Street, which is the largest crowd in New Orleans other than Mardi Gras. Defendant was stopped for his suspicious behavior on seeing EMS personnel, and he quickened his pace and tucked his bag under his … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on LA4: Nervousness and furtiveness of person clutching bag on Bourbon St during Halloween crowd justified stop to check for weapons

DE: SW for drugs allows search anywhere drugs may be hidden

A search warrant for drugs authorizes a search any place where drugs may be hidden. The fact other things are found that are evidence allows their seizure, too. Jackson v. State, 2019 Del. LEXIS 456 (Oct. 8, 2019). U.S. Probation … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standards of review | Comments Off on DE: SW for drugs allows search anywhere drugs may be hidden

D.Neb.: POs came to def’s house, smelled meth, and had RS for a search

Defendant was on a parole and drew her PO’s suspicion when she said she was putting money on a card at CVS since she was unemployed. They made a home visit and smelled methamphetamine cooking. They had reasonable suspicion for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Neb.: POs came to def’s house, smelled meth, and had RS for a search

D.Idaho: US Probation may enlist LEOs in conducting supervision search of cell phone

U.S. Probation was supervising defendant and they suspected child pornography on his cell phone. They enlisted HSI to search the phone. This did not violate federal law; USPO can get assistance to conduct a search. United States v. Johnson, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Idaho: US Probation may enlist LEOs in conducting supervision search of cell phone

IN: In a probation search of one under home confinement, only common areas or def’s specific area can be searched; MJ and gun found in common area

Defendant was placed on home confinement as a result of his conviction, and there was a search waiver provision. He was living in someone else’s house. Assuming only the common areas and those under defendant’s specific control are subject to … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on IN: In a probation search of one under home confinement, only common areas or def’s specific area can be searched; MJ and gun found in common area