FL: Violation of knock-and-announce statute doesn’t require exclusion

A violation of the knock-and-announce statute for serving search warrants doesn’t require exclusion of the evidence under Hudson, which is followed. State v. Times, 2026 Fla. LEXIS 982 (June 25, 2026).

“Idling” is not a crime for a passenger vehicle in D.C., but that was the reason for the stop. The search of the cupholder was not for alleged missing paperwork for registration, so the search is suppressed. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140305 (D.D.C. June 24, 2026).*

Defendant’s throwing a sacthel in a parking lot as he was being detained by the police was abandonment. United States v. Taylor, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139563 (M.D. Fla. June 24, 2026).*

Even if there was false information in the arrest warrant application, removing it still leaves probable cause. Majors v. City of West Des Moines, 24-3189 (8th Cir. June 25, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Knock and announce, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.