Category Archives: Drug or alcohol testing

MA: Obtaining CSLI by SW in 2014 was independent source against 2010 obtaining by request (and Carpenter was 2018)

The state obtained defendant’s CSLI without a showing of probable cause in 2010. In 2014, they sought it again with a search warrant. Carpenter came in 2018. The independent source doctrine applied in the 2014 search, and defense counsel wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Independent source | Comments Off on MA: Obtaining CSLI by SW in 2014 was independent source against 2010 obtaining by request (and Carpenter was 2018)

KS: GFE applies to blood draw before court held it unconstitutional

“Applying State v. Perkins, 310 Kan. 764, 449 P.3d 756 (2019), to the circumstances of this case, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies and allowed the district court to consider the results of a blood test for blood … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on KS: GFE applies to blood draw before court held it unconstitutional

TX14: SW to take blood includes ability to forensically test it

The search warrant for taking defendant’s blood included the ability to forensically test it. The fact that the forensic analysis of defendant’s blood occurred at a date beyond the three-day window for execution of the warrant did not render the … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Scope of search, Trespass, Waiver | Comments Off on TX14: SW to take blood includes ability to forensically test it

ABA CJS: The Privacy Implications of DUI Refusals and Forced Blood Alcohol Tests: What Judges Can Do

ABA CJS: The Privacy Implications of DUI Refusals and Forced Blood Alcohol Tests: What Judges Can Do by Hon. Zuberi Bakari Williams (“Usually, a refusal to take an alcohol breath test ends the collection of evidence of alcohol for routine … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on ABA CJS: The Privacy Implications of DUI Refusals and Forced Blood Alcohol Tests: What Judges Can Do

GA: Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a 5A violation

Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a Fifth Amendment violation. Motion to suppress improperly granted. State v. Awad, 2020 Ga. App. LEXIS 589 (Oct. 20, 2020):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges | Comments Off on GA: Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a 5A violation

E.D.Cal.: “probable cause does not require the best conceivable evidence”

“In defendant’s case, he was arrested for a violation of § 4.23(a)(1), permitting a BAC test as a search incident to arrest under Birchfield. Although there is a distinction between the concentration of alcohol in the blood and the degree … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: “probable cause does not require the best conceivable evidence”

MN: McNeely retroactive where properly pled

“We also conclude that McNeely applies retroactively to Edwards’s test-refusal conviction. Finally, we conclude that the postconviction court erred when it failed to follow the heightened pleading requirement and burden-shifting procedure set out in Fagin. We therefore reverse the postconviction … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MN: McNeely retroactive where properly pled

TX: SW to draw blood in DUI case allows testing for BAC

A search warrant to draw defendant driver’s blood included the ability to test it for BAC. But not anything else, such as genetic information, but that’s not the issue. Crider v. State, 2020 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 612 (Sept. 16, … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on TX: SW to draw blood in DUI case allows testing for BAC

Argus Leader: Federal judge awards thousands to those forcibly catheterized for urine samples

Argus Leader: Federal judge awards thousands to those forcibly catheterized for urine samples by Danielle Ferguson (“A federal judge has approved a settlement to individuals who were unconstitutionally made to provide urine samples for suspected drug use through forced catheterizations. … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Argus Leader: Federal judge awards thousands to those forcibly catheterized for urine samples

PA: Def gets benefit of Birchfield by adequately raising issue before it was even decided; but he loses on merits

Defendant would get the benefit of Birchfield because he developed and preserved the same argument below. He loses on the merits, however, because he voluntarily consented before the officer told him of the criminal penalties for refusal, so his consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on PA: Def gets benefit of Birchfield by adequately raising issue before it was even decided; but he loses on merits

HI: Local police dept’s implied consent form was accurate

On the totality, defendant’s consent to BAC testing was voluntary. The police department’s implied consent form was accurate. State v. Hosaka, 2020 Haw. LEXIS 256 (Aug. 28, 2020)*:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on HI: Local police dept’s implied consent form was accurate

D.P.R.: Def retained REP in backpack he stored in a car he wasn’t riding in

Defendant retained a reasonable expectation of privacy in a backpack that he placed in a car that he wasn’t in when it was searched. “The following circumstances established that the defendant possessed a reasonable expectation of privacy in the briefcase: … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def retained REP in backpack he stored in a car he wasn’t riding in

CA6: Alleged false statement to get an arrest warrant overcame QI

Alleged false statement to get an arrest warrant overcame qualified immunity. Tlapanco v. Elges, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25595 (6th Cir. Aug. 12, 2020). The state failed to show exigent circumstances excused obtaining a search warrant for defendant’s BAC. Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Alleged false statement to get an arrest warrant overcame QI

D.Me.: No exigent circumstances for BAC blood sample without SW

A Park Ranger in Acadia National Park in Maine followed Maine law to get a blood sample without a search warrant. There were no exigent circumstances, and the blood sample is suppressed. United States v. Manubolu, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Me.: No exigent circumstances for BAC blood sample without SW

TX1: SW to seize blood sample implicitly means it can be tested, too

A search warrant for a blood sample implicitly includes testing it. Davis v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 5990 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) July 30, 2020). Probable cause existed for seizure of five years of defendant’s Gmail account. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Overseizure, Staleness | Comments Off on TX1: SW to seize blood sample implicitly means it can be tested, too

WI: Officer didn’t have PC for BAC warrant until def was in hospital, and that was exigency

The officer didn’t have justification for a DWI blood warrant when he first arrived on the scene. That came later, and defendant was about to be administered painkillers in the hospital that would have degraded the BAC. There was exigency. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WI: Officer didn’t have PC for BAC warrant until def was in hospital, and that was exigency

CA9 applies QI standard to “egregious violations” of 4A for ICE entries

ICE entry onto appellant’s curtilage to arrest him was not an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment, the court applying qualified immunity language to show it wasn’t. “At the time of the entry, no binding authority held that an officer’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA9 applies QI standard to “egregious violations” of 4A for ICE entries

LA: Failure to argue Schmerber in trial court was waiver

Defendant’s failure to argue Schmerber in the trial court was [essentially] waiver, and defendant didn’t show the trial court erred. State v. Michael, 2020 La. LEXIS 1347 (July 9, 2020):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Waiver | Comments Off on LA: Failure to argue Schmerber in trial court was waiver

CA9: UA in prison is reasonable

“It is undisputed that urinalysis testing is a search under the Fourth Amendment and that drug testing in the prison context is generally constitutional unless it is conducted in an unreasonable manner. See Thompson v. Souza, 111 F.3d 694, 701 … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Prison and jail searches, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA9: UA in prison is reasonable

MT: Field test of seized drugs is a reasonable search

A field test of drugs seized off defendant’s person finding them presumptively methamphetamine is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. There is no enlarged reasonable expectation of privacy as to them when seized. State v. Funkhouser, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonableness, Search | Comments Off on MT: Field test of seized drugs is a reasonable search