Category Archives: Excessive force

D.S.D.: RS lacking: nervousness not enough, and remainder was minimal

USMJ’s report is rejected in part. On the reasonable suspicion finding: “Here, the government relies on several factors to establish reasonable suspicion. The court has found that some of these factors, such as the visibly pulsing heartbeat and rapid breathing, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: RS lacking: nervousness not enough, and remainder was minimal

W.D.Okla.: Whether 14A or 4A applies to ptf’s excessive force claim on arrest before PC found by judicial officer, result the same

Plaintiff’s excessive force claim occurred after arrest but before a judicial determination of probable cause. “If so, Mr. Willis would not have been a pretrial detainee for purposes of Plaintiff’s excessive force claim. However, because the parties characterize him as … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Whether 14A or 4A applies to ptf’s excessive force claim on arrest before PC found by judicial officer, result the same

NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

Dismissal of a § 1983 excessive force case in federal court was not collateral estoppel for a state case under the state tort claims act. Hernandez v. Parker, 2022 N.M. App. LEXIS 5 (Feb. 1, 2022). Extending this stop was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

CA6: Where there was a threat in the house on the second floor, it wasn’t unreasonable for officers to go check it out

“We have held, however, that ‘[w]ithin a few seconds of reasonably perceiving a sufficient danger, officers may use deadly force even if in hindsight the facts show that the persons threatened could have escaped unharmed.’ … Though different decisions on … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Where there was a threat in the house on the second floor, it wasn’t unreasonable for officers to go check it out

S.D.Ind.: The state used Google satellite images to corroborate officer’s testimony of stop

The government used Google satellite images and distancing to corroborate the officer’s testimony defendant didn’t signal his turn in time. After the stop, the smell of marijuana was apparent. United States v. Miles, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14860 (S.D.Ind. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Excessive force | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: The state used Google satellite images to corroborate officer’s testimony of stop

NJ: Race and being ¾ mile from a robbery not RS

Defendants were stopped in a car ¾ of a mile and driving away from the scene of a 7-11 robbery. All the officer knew was there were two black males involved. In their car, there were three black males. That … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Race and being ¾ mile from a robbery not RS

OH12: Trial court’s finding of no RS and no consent affirmed

The state failed to prove that the stop was with reasonable suspicion. “While Officer Ianson’s questioning was not expressly coercive, the circumstances surrounding the request to search made the questioning impliedly coercive. Thus, the circumstances suggest that Massey merely submitted … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH12: Trial court’s finding of no RS and no consent affirmed

S.D.Ind.: SoL for false arrest starts on release from custody

The statute of limitations for a false arrest case starts with release. Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill. (Manuel II), 903 F.3d 667, 669 (7th Cir. 2018), on remand from Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill., 137 S. Ct. 911 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: SoL for false arrest starts on release from custody

CA9: It is clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable

It was clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable. “To be clear, we are generally loath to second-guess law enforcement officers’ actions in a dangerous situation by analyzing each act without looking at the entire … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: It is clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable

CA7: Ptf’s manufactured evidence claim survives QI

Plaintiff was tried and acquitted for murder. He sued under § 1983 after two years in custody alleging evidence for his trial was fabricated and exculpatory evidence was withheld. The district court denied qualified immunity, and the defendants appealed. Defendants … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf’s manufactured evidence claim survives QI

Cal.3: Smell of burnt MJ from car not PC in California

The smell of burnt marijuana coming from a car in California isn’t probable cause. Blakes v. Superior Court, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 1057 (3d Dist. Nov. 24, 2021) (published Dec. 16, 2021). Officers had probable cause for the automobile exception … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.3: Smell of burnt MJ from car not PC in California

CA8 again grants QI to stopping innocent persons at gunpoint

The Eighth Circuit again holds that stopping innocent persons at gunpoint with almost any reason at all almost always results in qualified immunity for the officer. Irvin v. Richardson, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 37110 (8th Cir. Dec. 16, 2021):

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8 again grants QI to stopping innocent persons at gunpoint

E.D.N.Y.: For § 1988 fee shifting, SCOTUS expert fees not awarded, only local rate

The fact expert Fourth Amendment counsel would have charged the client $1,000-1,800 before SCOTUS isn’t binding on the district court for fee shifting. The local rate is what’s reasonable. Agudath Israel of America v. Hochul, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 233088 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: For § 1988 fee shifting, SCOTUS expert fees not awarded, only local rate

N.D.Ill.: Evil intent irrelevant in excessive force case if it all still objectively reasonable

“Issues of motive and intent are essentially irrelevant in [an excessive force] case. The test in an excessive force case is an objective one. Thus, ‘[a]n officer’s evil intentions will not make a Fourth Amendment violation out of an objectively … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Evil intent irrelevant in excessive force case if it all still objectively reasonable

OR: Proximity to others probably committing a crime isn’t PC

“[T]he facts supporting [the officer’s] belief that defendant committed a crime were not specific to defendant and related instead to defendant’s proximity to drug use by others.” “Because the totality of the circumstances here fail to demonstrate a probability that … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Proximity to others probably committing a crime isn’t PC

N.D.Ind.: Arrestee left out in cold in t-shirt stated 4A claim

Plaintiff states a Fourth Amendment claim that he was arrested and left outside in the snow in jeans and a t-shirt for more than 30 minutes. Bolin v. Prater, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225777 (N.D.Ind. Nov. 23, 2021). Leaving drugs … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Arrestee left out in cold in t-shirt stated 4A claim

E.D.Wash.: Covid-19 testing requirements are not subject to 4A reasonable suspicion standard

“Plaintiff argues any COVID-19 testing requirement is subject to the reasonable suspicion standards under the Fourth Amendment. … However, the Proclamation does not contain or implicate a testing requirement. … Therefore, Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim is without merit. Plaintiff has … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Covid-19 testing requirements are not subject to 4A reasonable suspicion standard

N.D.N.Y.: Prolonging detention after conviction is an 8A claim, not 4A

Prolongation of detention after conviction is an Eighth Amendment claim, not Fourth Amendment. Trapani v. Annucci, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223605 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2021). Plaintiff’s claims that a TV she bought at Walmart is video spying on her and … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Prolonging detention after conviction is an 8A claim, not 4A

CA6: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.”

As to probable cause: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.” Allen v. City of Ecorse, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 34348 (6th Cir. Nov. 18, 2021). Defendant’s guilty plea included a comprehensive … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.”

CA6: Sex with a court transport officer stated excessive force claim

Sexual intercourse with a court transport officer stated an excessive force claim. Plaintiff raised a factual dispute that the sex wasn’t consensual because of his control over her and a threat he made after he found out she talked about … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Sex with a court transport officer stated excessive force claim