S.D.Ind.: The state used Google satellite images to corroborate officer’s testimony of stop

The government used Google satellite images and distancing to corroborate the officer’s testimony defendant didn’t signal his turn in time. After the stop, the smell of marijuana was apparent. United States v. Miles, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14860 (S.D.Ind. Jan. 27, 2022).*

In an excessive force case, defendants object that an expert would testify that excessive force here violated the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiffs deny that but seek the expert’s testimony that policy was violated. That’s all denied. Kelly v. Stassi, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15081 (M.D.La. Jan. 27, 2022).*

Defendant’s motion to suppress is conclusory and alleges no facts. You can’t get a hearing on that. Amend it. United States v. Aragon, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15075 (D.Utah Jan. 26, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Excessive force. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.