Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA9: Settled by 1984 that Brady applied to police; qualified immunity denied

Not a search and seizure case, but we need to know it: It was established in 1984 at the time of one plaintiff’s conviction and 1991 of the other plaintiff that police had a duty to provide exculpatory evidence to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Settled by 1984 that Brady applied to police; qualified immunity denied

CA6: Handcuffing too tight is excessive force, and it’s well settled

It has been settled in the Sixth Circuit since 1991 that handcuffing a suspect too tight is a constitutitonal violation, so there is no qualified immunity for it. Baynes v. Cleland, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14824 (6th Cir. August 24, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Handcuffing too tight is excessive force, and it’s well settled

CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

Four witnesses ID’d defendant for a crime. The fact that the charges were later dropped didn’t form a basis for a § 1983 case. There was probable cause and no reasonable jury would conclude otherwise and that’s qualified immunity. Hart … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

CA9: Arrest of public defender summoned to court had no qualified immunity

A court security officer’s arrest of plaintiff public defender who was sent to get her to court had no qualified immunity for arresting her just because she sarcastically said “[i]f you want me to come right now, you’ll have to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest of public defender summoned to court had no qualified immunity

DC: Because the circuit hasn’t ruled on the standard for seizure of a child from the home, officials get qualified immunity

The circuits are split on whether a Fourth Amendment seizure of children from the home requires reasonable suspicion or probable cause. Moreover, what is an exigency is not consistent among the circuits. The point is that this circuit has not … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DC: Because the circuit hasn’t ruled on the standard for seizure of a child from the home, officials get qualified immunity

W.D.Mo.: Riley doesn’t apply retroactively on post-conviction review

Riley does not apply retroactively on post-conviction. Defendant pled guilty without raising a cell phone search question, and text message pictures showed him having sex with a minor who was in his car when it was stopped. Stringer v. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Riley doesn’t apply retroactively on post-conviction review

Two on emergency: DV call and multiple erratic 911 calls threatening to use a gun

A domestic violence call from an hysterical woman at a hotel room justified a warrantless entry into the room when the police could finally locate her room. Commonwealth v. Caple, 2015 PA Super 159, 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 425 (July … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on emergency: DV call and multiple erratic 911 calls threatening to use a gun

CA10: Not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable

It was not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable in 2010. Arden v. McIntosh, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12725 (10th Cir. July 23, 2015):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable

Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court?

Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court? by Steve Vladeck: Two weeks ago, I wrote about an important new decision by the US District Court for the District of Arizona, holding that the Fourth Amendment does apply … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court?

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law, overruling all past cases. Reasonable suspicion is all that’s needed for a traffic stop, not probable cause. State v. Houghton, 2015 WI 79, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 484 (July 14, 2015). Fleeing into … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

PA: DUI accident provided PC for automobile exception search

In a DUI accident, the officer had probable cause to search defendant’s vehicle for evidence of the impairment under the automobile exception. Commonwealth v. Best, 2015 PA Super 151, 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 409 (July 16, 2015).* The officer’s participation … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on PA: DUI accident provided PC for automobile exception search

CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

The officer here came to serve a summons at plaintiff’s house, and he looked through the window and saw the place was in disarray. He went to the door, and it was unlocked. He never knocked. He decided to perform … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

“[C]ourts have repeatedly and routinely held that a warrant that authorizes the search of ‘premises’ at a given residential address allows the search of detached garages, sheds, and other outbuildings even if these separate structures are not mentioned at all … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

OR: State could not raise new argument in CoA after remand never developed in trial court

On remand from the Supreme Court, the state asserted an argument never made in the trial court, and it’s treated as waived since there was no factual development. The prior decision is adhered to. State v. Heater, 271 Or. App. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: State could not raise new argument in CoA after remand never developed in trial court

W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

Defendant’s 12 cell phones could be seized as instrumentalities of a drug crime under a search warrant. Calling a number the officers obtained during a wiretap to identify a phone was not an illegal search. Turning on the phones just … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

W.D.Va.: No REP in boxes kept in borrowed storage shed

Defendant’s mother allowed him to store some boxes in her storage shed, and he didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the shed. When she consented to a search of the shed, that permitted the police to search closed … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No REP in boxes kept in borrowed storage shed

CA9: CP search warrant authorized second and third searches five years after the first search because gov’t still had computer

A second and third search of defendant’s computer for child pornography five years after the first one when defendant didn’t take a plea offer. That search was within the scope of the original warrant because the government still had the … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: CP search warrant authorized second and third searches five years after the first search because gov’t still had computer

Two on qualified immunity

City code enforcement officers do not get qualified immunity for seizure of unlicensed cars parked in his yard where they entered the property, and were doing an administrative seizure with no notice of appeal rights which were provided for by … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on qualified immunity

D.Utah: Defendant doctor who sold 95% of practice had no standing in the records of the clinic

The search warrant here was for medical records of a clinic and in storage. The defendant doctor who filed the motion to suppress sold the clinic and kept a 5% share. Records were in storage, too. The court concludes that … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Utah: Defendant doctor who sold 95% of practice had no standing in the records of the clinic

SCOTUS: Officers get qualified immunity in shooting a mentally ill person who came at them with a knife

Officers called to a disturbance where a mentally ill person threatened her social worker get qualified immunity for shooting her for coming at them with a knife. The law was not clearly established that they had to make any special … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Officers get qualified immunity in shooting a mentally ill person who came at them with a knife