Category Archives: Qualified immunity

SCOTUS: Not clearly established deadly force could not be used on suspect fleeing at high speed who threatened to shoot officers; Sotomayor: “By sanctioning a ‘shoot first, think later’ approach to policing, the Court renders the protections of the Fourth Amendment hollow.”

It was not clearly established at the time (2010) that deadly force could not be used on a suspect fleeing in a car at 85-100 mph who threatened to shoot police officers. Thus, the separate Fourth Amendment question doesn’t matter … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Not clearly established deadly force could not be used on suspect fleeing at high speed who threatened to shoot officers; Sotomayor: “By sanctioning a ‘shoot first, think later’ approach to policing, the Court renders the protections of the Fourth Amendment hollow.”

CA6: Officers’ civil assist ended up in stating a claim in the retaking of a car

Officers were on a civil assist in aiding repossession of a car that was involved in a family dispute going back and forth for a couple of years. “Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, we agree … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Officers’ civil assist ended up in stating a claim in the retaking of a car

CA10: Even if SW was overbroad, it was approved by DA before issuing magistrate got it, and they could reasonably rely on it

Even if a search warrant was overbroad in describing items to be seized with the requisite particularity, police officers were improperly denied qualified immunity since the warrant was approved by a district attorney and issued by a detached and neutral … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Even if SW was overbroad, it was approved by DA before issuing magistrate got it, and they could reasonably rely on it

CA5: Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights

Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights, particularly when the suppression hearing transcript wasn’t provided to the federal court. Cleveland … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights

Two on qualified immunity

Officers arrived at the scene of a shooting and immediately called for EMS, and called twice more before they finally arrived. Plaintiffs’ quarrel was that they weren’t more emphatic about the degree of injury. “A reasonable officer in Piotrowski’s or … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on qualified immunity

E.D.Tex.: Gunshots inside a house, screaming, and blood outside was exigent circumstances

Gunshots inside a house, screaming, and blood outside was exigent circumstances. [Yet it was argued it wasn’t. Hey, sometimes we have to.] United States v. Vanhorn, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127261 (E.D.Tex. September 21, 2015). A doctor was denied qualified … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Gunshots inside a house, screaming, and blood outside was exigent circumstances

CA5: School’s coercively obtaining social media password was protected by QI because it wasn’t firmly established at the time

A teacher and school officials coercively obtained plaintiff’s social media password because of alleged threatening messages. As First and Fourth Amendment rights, this right was not firmly established at the time, and defendants thus had no firm notice that their … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: School’s coercively obtaining social media password was protected by QI because it wasn’t firmly established at the time

CA11: Reaching into a house to effect a Terry stop without exigent circumstances violates the Fourth Amendment; but qualified immunity here

Reaching into a house to effect a Terry stop without exigent circumstances violates the Fourth Amendment. “Dorothy may have said it best when she said, ‘There is no place like home.’ Though we are pretty sure that she was not … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA11: Reaching into a house to effect a Terry stop without exigent circumstances violates the Fourth Amendment; but qualified immunity here

CA8: Qualified immunity because it was not clearly established in 2009 use of a Taser was unreasonable

It was not clearly established in 2009 that use of a Taser was unreasonable so the officers get qualified immunity. Here, it happened in jail when plaintiff refused to change into a jail uniform. Hollingsworth v. City of St. Ann, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Qualified immunity because it was not clearly established in 2009 use of a Taser was unreasonable

CA5: Ptfs’ failure to show lack of PC doomed § 1983 case

There was no effort on the part of plaintiffs to show that their arrest was without probable cause. They submitted city recall petitions, but some of the names were friends and relatives of the persons being recalled. The recallees hired … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptfs’ failure to show lack of PC doomed § 1983 case

OR: It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement

It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement. State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 273 Ore. App. 298, 356 P.3d 674 (2015) (under submission 2½ years), aff’d, State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 361 Ore. 163, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 166 (March 2, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OR: It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement

CA9: Settled by 1984 that Brady applied to police; qualified immunity denied

Not a search and seizure case, but we need to know it: It was established in 1984 at the time of one plaintiff’s conviction and 1991 of the other plaintiff that police had a duty to provide exculpatory evidence to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Settled by 1984 that Brady applied to police; qualified immunity denied

CA6: Handcuffing too tight is excessive force, and it’s well settled

It has been settled in the Sixth Circuit since 1991 that handcuffing a suspect too tight is a constitutitonal violation, so there is no qualified immunity for it. Baynes v. Cleland, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14824 (6th Cir. August 24, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Handcuffing too tight is excessive force, and it’s well settled

CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

Four witnesses ID’d defendant for a crime. The fact that the charges were later dropped didn’t form a basis for a § 1983 case. There was probable cause and no reasonable jury would conclude otherwise and that’s qualified immunity. Hart … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

CA9: Arrest of public defender summoned to court had no qualified immunity

A court security officer’s arrest of plaintiff public defender who was sent to get her to court had no qualified immunity for arresting her just because she sarcastically said “[i]f you want me to come right now, you’ll have to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest of public defender summoned to court had no qualified immunity

DC: Because the circuit hasn’t ruled on the standard for seizure of a child from the home, officials get qualified immunity

The circuits are split on whether a Fourth Amendment seizure of children from the home requires reasonable suspicion or probable cause. Moreover, what is an exigency is not consistent among the circuits. The point is that this circuit has not … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DC: Because the circuit hasn’t ruled on the standard for seizure of a child from the home, officials get qualified immunity

W.D.Mo.: Riley doesn’t apply retroactively on post-conviction review

Riley does not apply retroactively on post-conviction. Defendant pled guilty without raising a cell phone search question, and text message pictures showed him having sex with a minor who was in his car when it was stopped. Stringer v. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Riley doesn’t apply retroactively on post-conviction review

Two on emergency: DV call and multiple erratic 911 calls threatening to use a gun

A domestic violence call from an hysterical woman at a hotel room justified a warrantless entry into the room when the police could finally locate her room. Commonwealth v. Caple, 2015 PA Super 159, 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 425 (July … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on emergency: DV call and multiple erratic 911 calls threatening to use a gun

CA10: Not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable

It was not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable in 2010. Arden v. McIntosh, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12725 (10th Cir. July 23, 2015):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable

Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court?

Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court? by Steve Vladeck: Two weeks ago, I wrote about an important new decision by the US District Court for the District of Arizona, holding that the Fourth Amendment does apply … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court?