Category Archives: Qualified immunity

W.D.Mo.: Riley doesn’t apply retroactively on post-conviction review

Riley does not apply retroactively on post-conviction. Defendant pled guilty without raising a cell phone search question, and text message pictures showed him having sex with a minor who was in his car when it was stopped. Stringer v. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Riley doesn’t apply retroactively on post-conviction review

Two on emergency: DV call and multiple erratic 911 calls threatening to use a gun

A domestic violence call from an hysterical woman at a hotel room justified a warrantless entry into the room when the police could finally locate her room. Commonwealth v. Caple, 2015 PA Super 159, 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 425 (July … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on emergency: DV call and multiple erratic 911 calls threatening to use a gun

CA10: Not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable

It was not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable in 2010. Arden v. McIntosh, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12725 (10th Cir. July 23, 2015):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable

Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court?

Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court? by Steve Vladeck: Two weeks ago, I wrote about an important new decision by the US District Court for the District of Arizona, holding that the Fourth Amendment does apply … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court?

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law, overruling all past cases. Reasonable suspicion is all that’s needed for a traffic stop, not probable cause. State v. Houghton, 2015 WI 79, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 484 (July 14, 2015). Fleeing into … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

PA: DUI accident provided PC for automobile exception search

In a DUI accident, the officer had probable cause to search defendant’s vehicle for evidence of the impairment under the automobile exception. Commonwealth v. Best, 2015 PA Super 151, 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 409 (July 16, 2015).* The officer’s participation … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on PA: DUI accident provided PC for automobile exception search

CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

The officer here came to serve a summons at plaintiff’s house, and he looked through the window and saw the place was in disarray. He went to the door, and it was unlocked. He never knocked. He decided to perform … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

“[C]ourts have repeatedly and routinely held that a warrant that authorizes the search of ‘premises’ at a given residential address allows the search of detached garages, sheds, and other outbuildings even if these separate structures are not mentioned at all … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

OR: State could not raise new argument in CoA after remand never developed in trial court

On remand from the Supreme Court, the state asserted an argument never made in the trial court, and it’s treated as waived since there was no factual development. The prior decision is adhered to. State v. Heater, 271 Or. App. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: State could not raise new argument in CoA after remand never developed in trial court

W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

Defendant’s 12 cell phones could be seized as instrumentalities of a drug crime under a search warrant. Calling a number the officers obtained during a wiretap to identify a phone was not an illegal search. Turning on the phones just … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

W.D.Va.: No REP in boxes kept in borrowed storage shed

Defendant’s mother allowed him to store some boxes in her storage shed, and he didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the shed. When she consented to a search of the shed, that permitted the police to search closed … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No REP in boxes kept in borrowed storage shed

CA9: CP search warrant authorized second and third searches five years after the first search because gov’t still had computer

A second and third search of defendant’s computer for child pornography five years after the first one when defendant didn’t take a plea offer. That search was within the scope of the original warrant because the government still had the … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: CP search warrant authorized second and third searches five years after the first search because gov’t still had computer

Two on qualified immunity

City code enforcement officers do not get qualified immunity for seizure of unlicensed cars parked in his yard where they entered the property, and were doing an administrative seizure with no notice of appeal rights which were provided for by … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on qualified immunity

D.Utah: Defendant doctor who sold 95% of practice had no standing in the records of the clinic

The search warrant here was for medical records of a clinic and in storage. The defendant doctor who filed the motion to suppress sold the clinic and kept a 5% share. Records were in storage, too. The court concludes that … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Utah: Defendant doctor who sold 95% of practice had no standing in the records of the clinic

SCOTUS: Officers get qualified immunity in shooting a mentally ill person who came at them with a knife

Officers called to a disturbance where a mentally ill person threatened her social worker get qualified immunity for shooting her for coming at them with a knife. The law was not clearly established that they had to make any special … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Officers get qualified immunity in shooting a mentally ill person who came at them with a knife

CA6: Handcuffing for open carry in Ohio stated a claim; no qualified immunity

The Ohio legislature decided that open carry is permissible with a CCW. Plaintiff was stopped and handcuffed for thirty minutes and let go. He states a claim and qualified immunity is no defense. “Where it is lawful to possess a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Handcuffing for open carry in Ohio stated a claim; no qualified immunity

CA6: Indictment not founded on false facts precludes Bivens action

Michigan Hutaree militia members were indicted, tried, and acquitted. Their Bivens action for malicious prosecution fails. The indictment was not based on provably false testimony, and there was thus probable cause for the case to go forward. “The indictment in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Indictment not founded on false facts precludes Bivens action

boingboing: Court says DEA is allowed to secretly fill your truck with weed, get into firefights with Zetas

boingboing: Court says DEA is allowed to secretly fill your truck with weed, get into firefights with Zetas by Cory Doctorow: Craig Patty asked his employee Lawrence Chapa to help take one of his two trucks to the garage, not … Continue reading

Posted in Police misconduct, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on boingboing: Court says DEA is allowed to secretly fill your truck with weed, get into firefights with Zetas

CA5 en banc: Border Patrol agent’s shooting of unarmed teenager across border gets qualified immunity

On en banc review, the panel decision is reinstated. The U.S. government has sovereign immunity for the shooting death of an armed Mexican teenager standing in Mexico shot from the U.S. at Ciudad Juarez, across the border from El Paso. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5 en banc: Border Patrol agent’s shooting of unarmed teenager across border gets qualified immunity

CA3: Officers confronted with an unknown call of a screaming woman were not unreasonable in waiting to sort it out, even though it resulted in a delay of getting a woman to the hospital where she died

In a “tragic” case of a young woman dying from lock of oxygen to the brain from an asthma attack, police responded to a 911 call of a “woman screaming” and didn’t know what they had. When they arrived, the … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Officers confronted with an unknown call of a screaming woman were not unreasonable in waiting to sort it out, even though it resulted in a delay of getting a woman to the hospital where she died