Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA4: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require reporting back to the source

The CI’s information viewed under the totality provided reasonable suspicion for the stop of defendant. [Defendant’s approach was divide and conquer the facts.] The collective knowledge doctrine does not require the stopping and arresting officer keep the officer providing the … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require reporting back to the source

CA6: SWAT team surrounding a house for a knock-and-talk violates 4A

Sending the SWAT team to surround a house for a knock-and-talk violated the Fourth Amendment. Having officers in the backyard for officer safety may serve that function, but it’s still a violation of the curtilage under the Fourth Amendment. There … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: SWAT team surrounding a house for a knock-and-talk violates 4A

W.D.Va.: Stopping ptf for giving cop “the finger” violates clearly established 4A law

Stopping plaintiff merely for giving a police officer the finger violates clearly established Fourth Amendment law. Clark v. Coleman, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136749 (W.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2018):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Stopping ptf for giving cop “the finger” violates clearly established 4A law

CA7: Searching wrong apt on ambiguous SW (apt 1 where there were 1A & 1B) gets qualified immunity here

When the officer arrived at plaintiff’s address with a search warrant for apartment 1, he instead found apartments 1A and 1B. The officers attempted to clear up the ambiguity before the search, and they searched 1A finding nothing, and the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Searching wrong apt on ambiguous SW (apt 1 where there were 1A & 1B) gets qualified immunity here

CA8: Ignoring exculpatory evidence before a child abuse seizure of children denies QI to officers

After the first round of discovery, officers who seized children from a home on a bizarre and unsubstantiated allegation from a sibling don’t yet get qualified immunity. “Thus, although the investigators went to the home with the intent to remove … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Ignoring exculpatory evidence before a child abuse seizure of children denies QI to officers

techdirt: 9th Circuit Denies Cops Who Shot Innocent People 15 Times Qualified Immunity For The Second Time

techdirt: 9th Circuit Denies Cops Who Shot Innocent People 15 Times Qualified Immunity For The Second Time by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on techdirt: 9th Circuit Denies Cops Who Shot Innocent People 15 Times Qualified Immunity For The Second Time

W.D.Mich.: In a prison male group strip search, def female guard doesn’t show QI from how it was done

In a prison group strip search, “Defendant has failed to properly support her motion for summary judgment with relevant evidence showing the existence of a legitimate penological need for the group strip search and why her presence inside the Chapel … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: In a prison male group strip search, def female guard doesn’t show QI from how it was done

CA6: Franks violation overcomes qualified immunity in § 1983 case

In this § 1983 case, the officer provided false information in the affidavit for the search warrant that was critical to the finding of probable cause. Without that information, there was no probable cause. The district court’s finding that qualified … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Franks violation overcomes qualified immunity in § 1983 case

NYTimes: Advocates From Left and Right Ask Supreme Court to Revisit Immunity Defense

NYTimes: Advocates From Left and Right Ask Supreme Court to Revisit Immunity Defense by Alan Feuer:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NYTimes: Advocates From Left and Right Ask Supreme Court to Revisit Immunity Defense

D.Md.: Officer gets QI for arresting person with same name but it turned out warrant was for far younger woman of different race

Plaintiff was legally blind but owned her car. She was a passenger in the back seat. After the vehicle was stopped, the officer found a warrant for a person with the same name as her. She protested she wasn’t the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Md.: Officer gets QI for arresting person with same name but it turned out warrant was for far younger woman of different race

CA5: Mass suspicionless strip search of a class of 6th grade girls was clearly unreasonable with a failure to train on policy that would have prevented it

“During a sixth-grade choir class, an assistant principal allegedly ordered a mass, suspicionless strip search of the underwear of twenty-two preteen girls. All agree the search violated the girls’ constitutional rights under Texas and federal law. Even so, the district … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Mass suspicionless strip search of a class of 6th grade girls was clearly unreasonable with a failure to train on policy that would have prevented it

SD: Electronic signature on a SW application sent in to magistrate is valid as an oath

An electronic signature on a search warrant application is still an oath for an affidavit required under state law, and the motion to suppress was properly denied. State v. Bowers, 2018 SD 50 (June 27, 2018). Juvenile defendant was interrogated … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on SD: Electronic signature on a SW application sent in to magistrate is valid as an oath

SCOTUS: Too many facts in dispute to grant QI dismissal on a claim of interference with right to pray after entry into the house; 4A claim revived after being waived

This pro se plaintiff alleged police came into her house for a complaint of her radio being too loud, and she was told to stop praying. The district court dismissed her First and Fourth Amendment claims for failure to state … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Too many facts in dispute to grant QI dismissal on a claim of interference with right to pray after entry into the house; 4A claim revived after being waived

CA2: A material witness seized and never presented to a judge stated a claim; and no QI

Plaintiff was held without a hearing as an alleged material witness, but never presented to a court. The district court granted qualified immunity, and the court of appeals reversed. Her rights were clearly established that she was entitled to be … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: A material witness seized and never presented to a judge stated a claim; and no QI

CA7: In the private search doctrine and QI, it’s not clearly established that the actors knowing each other isn’t enough

“But for purposes of official immunity, the question is whether existing law clearly establishes that a private search is treated as a governmental search when the public and private actors are friends and potential future coworkers.” It does not. There … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: In the private search doctrine and QI, it’s not clearly established that the actors knowing each other isn’t enough

CA11: The officer received easily verifiable information that the tattoo on the suspect didn’t match the tattoos of the perpetrator; the arrest was without PC

Before the arrest the officer received easily verifiable exculpatory information from a witness, that the citizen’s single tattoo did not match the multiple tattoos visible on the perpetrator in the crime scene photograph that the officer showed the witness. Despite … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: The officer received easily verifiable information that the tattoo on the suspect didn’t match the tattoos of the perpetrator; the arrest was without PC

CT: Seeing sawed off shotgun through van window justified opening it up to seize it

The officers here saw a sawed off shotgun through the windows of defendant’s van, and it was not unreasonable to use the key fob to open the door to seize it. State v. Ortiz, 2018 Conn. App. LEXIS 235 (June … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CT: Seeing sawed off shotgun through van window justified opening it up to seize it

E.D.N.Y.: QI not applied because it does protect those who knowingly violate constitutional rights

Law.com: “Deciding that qualified immunity has evolved to the point where it can protect police officers who intentionally flout constitutional rights, a federal judge in Brooklyn declined to grant it to four police officers who broke into a man’s house … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: QI not applied because it does protect those who knowingly violate constitutional rights

D.D.C.: HR employee of DC crime lab couldn’t be subjected to random drug testing

The District of Columbia’s policy to randomly drug test virtually everybody working at the crime lab could not constitutionally apply to plaintiff, a human resources specialist there. She was fired for refusing a drug test, and received $802,000 at a … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.D.C.: HR employee of DC crime lab couldn’t be subjected to random drug testing

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: A South Carolina anti-drug police unit admitted it conducts illegal no-knock raids

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: A South Carolina anti-drug police unit admitted it conducts illegal no-knock raids by Radley Balko. “Yet local officials don’t seem to mind.” The case: Despite officers’ deposition testimony that they announced before entry shooting plaintiff nine … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: A South Carolina anti-drug police unit admitted it conducts illegal no-knock raids