Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA11: PC or not, the warrantless entry to arrest ptf violated the 4A

The parties got into an argument, and plaintiff went back into his house. The defendant came in after him. “Without deciding whether Bailey’s arrest was supported by probable cause—or, as it goes in the qualified-immunity context, ‘arguable probable cause’—we reverse. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: PC or not, the warrantless entry to arrest ptf violated the 4A

D.Idaho: US Probation may enlist LEOs in conducting supervision search of cell phone

U.S. Probation was supervising defendant and they suspected child pornography on his cell phone. They enlisted HSI to search the phone. This did not violate federal law; USPO can get assistance to conduct a search. United States v. Johnson, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Idaho: US Probation may enlist LEOs in conducting supervision search of cell phone

CA3: A threat to violate the 4A is not a 4A violation; it is contingent for Art. III

“The Probation Department employees’ alleged threat to send Repotski back to jail does not state a constitutional violation cognizable under § 1983. See McFadden v. Lucas, 713 F.2d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 1983) (noting that mere threats do not amount … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Search, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: A threat to violate the 4A is not a 4A violation; it is contingent for Art. III

CA10: Remanded again on QI because the court admittedly wasn’t perfectly clear

Appellate courts can’t always speak with one voice or opinion. The panel in this case previously issued three opinions. Harte v. Bd. of Comm’rs of the Cty. of Johnson, 864 F.3d 1154 (10th Cir. 2017). On remand, then, everybody had … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Remanded again on QI because the court admittedly wasn’t perfectly clear

CA6: Police get QI for coming to take ptf in for a mental exam but electing instead to arrest

Police were called to plaintiff’s house because he was barricaded in a closet with a gun threatening to kill himself. When police arrived, he was ultimately taken in for alleged crimes, for which he was later acquitted. The officers get … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Police get QI for coming to take ptf in for a mental exam but electing instead to arrest

CA11: Ptf arrested on incorrect computer entry had 4A rights violated, but defs get QI

Plaintiff paid his fine for a speeding ticket and that was to avoid probation. The probation officer was in court and heard all that. Some clerk, however, entered into the computer system that he was on probation. Plaintiff was later … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf arrested on incorrect computer entry had 4A rights violated, but defs get QI

The Atlantic: Federal Officials Should Be Accountable for Their Wrongdoing

The Atlantic: Federal Officials Should Be Accountable for Their Wrongdoing by Leah Litman (“And judges need to be the ones to make them pay.”)

Posted in Police misconduct, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Federal Officials Should Be Accountable for Their Wrongdoing

Reason: A License for Outrageous Police Conduct

Reason: A License for Outrageous Police Conduct by Jacob Sullum (“Qualified immunity protects cops from liability for actions that would land ordinary people in jail.”)

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Reason: A License for Outrageous Police Conduct

CA9: QI: without a case almost on point, you lose

A typical Fourth Amendment qualified immunity outcome on appeal: You need a case that’s obvious or a case substantially on point. Without it, you lose. Sightler v. Nisleit, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28702 (9th Cir. Sept. 23, 2019)*:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: QI: without a case almost on point, you lose

W.D.Ark.: Whether windshield was cracked enough to be a violation of traffic laws doesn’t matter, it was still cracked which was enough for a stop

Defendant was stopped because of a crack in the windshield. He argued it wasn’t sufficiently cracked to be a violation of law. The point is, however, that the stop was at least justified by the crack. “To summarize, Officer Johnson … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Whether windshield was cracked enough to be a violation of traffic laws doesn’t matter, it was still cracked which was enough for a stop

CA9: IRS agent’s need to watch ptf pee during SW was unreasonable; they didn’t do that to her husband when he did

Plaintiff’s claim that an IRS CID investigator had to watch her go to the bathroom just in case she was hiding evidence survived a qualified immunity challenge. The right to bodily privacy was established at the time, and the officer’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: IRS agent’s need to watch ptf pee during SW was unreasonable; they didn’t do that to her husband when he did

CA6: Seizing ptf out of her home for a psych eval without PC stated claim and overcame QI

Plaintiff stated a claim that she was unreasonably seized in her home without probable cause or a warrant for a psych evaluation. Qualified immunity denied. Rudolph v. Atkinson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28477 (6th Cir. Sept. 20, 2019)*:

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Seizing ptf out of her home for a psych eval without PC stated claim and overcame QI

CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

A federal tort claims act case was properly stated for an American citizen plaintiff’s four day detention in an immigration facility as lacking probable cause. Hernandez v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28081 (2d Cir. Sept. 17, 2019). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

CA11: Criminal trial record not fully binding on ptf who was on trial there because incentives to litigate were different

The defendants observed plaintiff’s actions and they saw probable cause to believe he committed trespass. Therefore, the false arrest claim fails. His excessive force claim, however, survives summary judgment. Using the criminal trial testimony wasn’t particularly helpful or controlling because … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Criminal trial record not fully binding on ptf who was on trial there because incentives to litigate were different

CA8: Patel didn’t bar police requesting look at hotel registry in looking for bank robbers; third-party doctrine applies

City of Los Angeles v. Patel didn’t make the police look at a hotel registry a search. Defendants were suspected of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft in printing bogus checks and cashing them. Police went to a motel where … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Patel didn’t bar police requesting look at hotel registry in looking for bank robbers; third-party doctrine applies

IL: Disorderly conduct can justify a Terry stop

Police received a 911 call about a man with a blue hoodie on a bicycle shouting profanities. Because the call was to 911 and recorded and logged with caller ID, it was more reliable. On seeing the man, the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Disorderly conduct can justify a Terry stop

LA5: Failure to raise scope of search issue below was waiver on appeal

The officer affiant adequately corroborated the CI to show probable cause. Defendant’s argument that the search of his house under the warrant couldn’t include the back yard was not preserved below [but it usually would be valid anyway]. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LA5: Failure to raise scope of search issue below was waiver on appeal

CA8: Strip search of female detainee on parking lot stated § 1983 claim

Nearly public strip search of female detainee on an open parking lot by a female officer also berating her with a male officer nearby stated a claim and overcame qualified immunity. Robinson v. Hawkins, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 26772 (8th … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on CA8: Strip search of female detainee on parking lot stated § 1983 claim

CA11: Arrest for not answering knocks to door by officers with a writ of possession unreasonable and no QI

Plaintiff was arrested for ignoring knocks to the door from officers with a writ of possession. They didn’t even ring the doorbell. Officers entered through the garage area and pulled a gun on plaintiff. There was no justification asserted for … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Arrest for not answering knocks to door by officers with a writ of possession unreasonable and no QI

CA6: Tightening handcuffs more when arrestee complains and threatening her life overcame QI

“A group of masked City of Detroit police officers broke down plaintiff Katrina McGrew’s door, threw her to the ground, and handcuffed her so tightly it left bruises. When she complained about how constricting the handcuffs were, the officers threatened … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: Tightening handcuffs more when arrestee complains and threatening her life overcame QI