Category Archives: Qualified immunity

Lawfare: Hold Police Accountable by Changing Public Tort Law, Not Just Qualified Immunity

Lawfare: Hold Police Accountable by Changing Public Tort Law, Not Just Qualified Immunity by Paul Stern:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Lawfare: Hold Police Accountable by Changing Public Tort Law, Not Just Qualified Immunity

CNS: Courthouse News Service: Colorado Blocks Qualified Immunity for Police

Courthouse News Service: Colorado Blocks Qualified Immunity for Police by Amanda Pampuro (“Colorado commemorated Juneteenth on Friday by passing an enormous police reform bill, which includes blocking qualified immunity as a defense for police officers in state court. Colorado Governor … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CNS: Courthouse News Service: Colorado Blocks Qualified Immunity for Police

CA11: Ptf gets discovery on QI before SJ can be granted

“We hold that the district court abused its discretion by denying the Plaintiff any opportunity to conduct discovery in this case before being made to respond to McFarlane’s motion for summary judgment” on qualified immunity. Defendants are not entitled to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf gets discovery on QI before SJ can be granted

CA11: Detaining an innocent person in handcuffs for two hours at scene of SW doesn’t state a claim

Officers executing a search warrant detained an innocent person in handcuffs for two hours, and that doesn’t state a claim. Also, just being at the warrant execution meeting before the officers went to the scene doesn’t make all those officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Detaining an innocent person in handcuffs for two hours at scene of SW doesn’t state a claim

CA9: Clearly established by 2014 for QI that chokehold on nonresisting detainee could be excessive force

It was clearly established at the time that a chokehold on a no longer resisting detainee was excessive force and all officers participating were potentially responsible. Martinez v. City of Pittsburg, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 19207 (9th Cir. June 19, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Clearly established by 2014 for QI that chokehold on nonresisting detainee could be excessive force

CA6: QI denied officers who Tased a man for not getting out of his car fast enough; he had recent surgery and a colostomy bag

Plaintiff was Tased when he slowly got out of a car after officers flashed badges on him. He was recovering from surgery and had a colostomy bag and staples in his stomach. While the use of force does not require … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: QI denied officers who Tased a man for not getting out of his car fast enough; he had recent surgery and a colostomy bag

Cato.org: Supreme Court Refuses to Reconsider Qualified Immunity

Cato.org: Supreme Court Refuses to Reconsider Qualified Immunity:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Cato.org: Supreme Court Refuses to Reconsider Qualified Immunity

WSJ: How the Warren Court Enabled Police Abuse

WSJ: How the Warren Court Enabled Police Abuse by David B. Rivkin Jr. and Andrew M. Grossman (“‘Qualified immunity’ lets cops avoid accountability. It’s an invention of the liberal chief justice.”):

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on WSJ: How the Warren Court Enabled Police Abuse

NPR: Supreme Court Will Not Reexamine Doctrine That Shields Police In Misconduct Suits

NPR: Supreme Court Will Not Reexamine Doctrine That Shields Police In Misconduct Suits by Nina Totenberg (“Amid the tumult over police brutality allegations across the country, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to reexamine the much-criticized, modern-day legal doctrine … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NPR: Supreme Court Will Not Reexamine Doctrine That Shields Police In Misconduct Suits

NY4: Fire started during police standoff was exigency

Starting a fire during a police standoff is an exigent circumstance permitting a police entry after the fire was put out. “The entry and search occurred immediately after firefighters extinguished the fire that defendant had set during a standoff with … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY4: Fire started during police standoff was exigency

CA4: “a reasonable jury could find that Jones was both secured and incapacitated” when police shot him; QI denied

“In 2013, Wayne Jones, a black man experiencing homelessness, was stopped by law enforcement in Martinsburg, West Virginia for walking alongside, rather than on, the sidewalk. By the end of this encounter, Jones would be dead. Armed only with a … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: “a reasonable jury could find that Jones was both secured and incapacitated” when police shot him; QI denied

CA10: 15-minute call to EPIC when officer given inconsistent travel plans wasn’t unreasonable

Inconsistent travel plans coming from the driver and passenger justified a 15 minute call to EPIC to see if the vehicle had crossed the border recently, and this was not unreasonable. United States v. Morales, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 17865 … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: 15-minute call to EPIC when officer given inconsistent travel plans wasn’t unreasonable

Courthouse News Service: New House Bill Would Revoke ‘Qualified Immunity’ for Police

Courthouse News Service: New House Bill Would Revoke ‘Qualified Immunity’ for Police by Thomas Harrison (“The bill would eliminate qualified immunity, the ability of police officers to argue they acted in good faith when they violated someone’s constitutional rights. It … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: New House Bill Would Revoke ‘Qualified Immunity’ for Police

SCOTUS conferencing 10 qualified immunity cases today

Probably the results of the conference on Monday. See WaPo: Supreme Court asked to reconsider immunity available to police accused of brutality

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS conferencing 10 qualified immunity cases today

CA2: Police actions showed warrantless entry wasn’t for emergency purposes sufficient to create jury question

Decedent was a mentally ill veteran who accidentally activated an at home alarm and police responded. He was ultimately shot and police came in, not responding to a wounded man but as a criminal. There was a plausible claim that … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Police actions showed warrantless entry wasn’t for emergency purposes sufficient to create jury question

E.D.Ark.: “After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish” PC

“After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish that Green was dead and that his death was caused by the criminal act of another person. Accordingly, the Court finds … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: “After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish” PC

OH5: Trial court’s finding of officer’s credibility where dashcam didn’t help was binding on appeal

The dashcam video was inconclusive on whether defendant stopped, but the trial court credited the officer, and that’s binding on the court of appeals. State v. Blasingame, 2020-Ohio-3087, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2029 (5th Dist. May 21, 2020).* Two dashcam … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH5: Trial court’s finding of officer’s credibility where dashcam didn’t help was binding on appeal

CA6: No QI for prosecutors instigating raid without PC

Tennessee prosecutors have no qualified immunity for CBD raids instigated without probable cause in Operation Candy Crush. Even the state indictment they procured without probable cause doesn’t grant them immunity. Rieves v. Town of Smyrna, Tennessee, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No QI for prosecutors instigating raid without PC

MA: Def gets limited discovery into CI’s reliability otherwise not provided by state

Massachusetts court sees no need to intervene yet in a trial court’s limited discovery order for the CI’s reliability which was wanting in the affidavit. “If the Commonwealth feels that any document would reveal the informant’s identity, it can seek … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MA: Def gets limited discovery into CI’s reliability otherwise not provided by state

NYT: How Reuters Analyzed Court Data on Qualified Immunity

NYT: How Reuters Analyzed Court Data on Qualified Immunity (“Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has repeatedly criticized her fellow justices for creating, as she put it in a 2018 dissent, an ‘absolute shield’ for police officers accused of excessive force. … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NYT: How Reuters Analyzed Court Data on Qualified Immunity