Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA6: Excessive force and qualified immunity; officer responding to threat of force

“The record here demonstrates the defendant officers’ use of deadly force was objectively reasonable. Three of the four officers surrounding McShann’s vehicle testified that when McShann woke, he was compliant or mostly compliant with their order that he put his … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Excessive force and qualified immunity; officer responding to threat of force

CA2: The officer’s perceptions were reasonable that entry into defendant’s backyard was necessary

“Nor can we say that Galligan’s enforcement action was clearly unlawful. The undisputed facts of this case demonstrate that Plaintiffs kept a variety of unusual objects in their backyard, causing it to resemble a junkyard. The question is not whether … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA2: The officer’s perceptions were reasonable that entry into defendant’s backyard was necessary

OH8: Traffic offense overcomes pretext claim

An actual traffic offense overcomes defense claims the stop was actually a motive for searching for drugs. Defendant didn’t produce current proof of insurance, and that led to extension of the stop. The officer wasn’t just obliged to have noted … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pretext, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OH8: Traffic offense overcomes pretext claim

CA9: ICE warrant authorized knocking at appellant’s door, and co-occupant consented to entry

ICE officers could approach appellant’s door under Jardines with an immigration arrest warrant even though it is not a judicial warrant. “The immigration warrant licensed the officers to solicit consent to entry for the limited purpose of enforcing the civil … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: ICE warrant authorized knocking at appellant’s door, and co-occupant consented to entry

CA9: Passenger also shot in effort to stop vehicle was seized under 4A; SJ denied on reasonableness of force

A vehicle passenger who was not intentionally targeted by the officers had a cognizable Fourth Amendment interest under Brower v. County of Inyo and Brendlin v. California. His freedom of movement was terminated when the officers intentionally shot at the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Passenger also shot in effort to stop vehicle was seized under 4A; SJ denied on reasonableness of force

CA8: Officer wins two § 1983 cases in same day from E.D. Mo., Cape Girardeau

The officer had cause for defendant’s stop for a broken taillight and then found a warrant for his arrest. “Wood also alleges that after the fact, Wooten fabricated evidence about the arrest (and then invoked his Fifth Amendment right about … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Officer wins two § 1983 cases in same day from E.D. Mo., Cape Girardeau

D.Mont.: State trooper’s alleged violation of a tribal agreement with state wasn’t sufficient for exclusionary rule

A Montana state trooper’s alleged violations of a cross deputization agreement with a tribe wasn’t justification for exclusion of evidence from his stop of defendant. “The Court fails to make the connection between any constitutional violation whose remedy is suppression … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Mont.: State trooper’s alleged violation of a tribal agreement with state wasn’t sufficient for exclusionary rule

CA3: A predicate to a 41(g) motion to return property is a prior request

“To the extent Baer complains of the Government’s failure to return his devices, his argument fails because he never sought their return. Defendants who never seek the return of the property cannot argue that delay violated the Fourth Amendment. United … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA3: A predicate to a 41(g) motion to return property is a prior request

CA10: Weaknesses in the PC for Franks should be disclosed

Plaintiff failed to show a Franks violation in the affidavit for warrant. “To be sure, if the affiant for a warrant possesses information that would cast substantial doubt on the existence of probable cause, that information should not be intentionally … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Weaknesses in the PC for Franks should be disclosed

CA10: Uncertainty def was alone inside justified protective sweep

The consenter’s uncertainty that defendant was alone in the apartment justified a protective sweep, and ultimately she consented and the evidence supports that conclusion. United States v. Phyfier, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 133 (11th Cir. Jan. 5, 2021). [Even so, … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Uncertainty def was alone inside justified protective sweep

CA8: Detention of ptf for videoing outside of police station was reasonable given the officers’ concerns about other crimes and vandalism there

Plaintiff’s detention outside the police station for engaging in confrontational behavior went beyond any constitutionally protected recording activity. Defendants’ actions, when combined with their knowledge of vehicles being vandalized and stolen in the area and their personal knowledge that a … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA8: Detention of ptf for videoing outside of police station was reasonable given the officers’ concerns about other crimes and vandalism there

NYLJ: The Myriad Problems with Qualified Immunity

Analysis: The Myriad Problems With Qualified Immunity (“In his Section 1983 Litigation column, Martin Schwartz joins jurists and academics who, over the last several years, have criticized the Supreme Court’s qualified immunity jurisprudence, calling for its elimination or at least … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NYLJ: The Myriad Problems with Qualified Immunity

CA3: No REP in cell phone subscriber records

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in cell phone subscriber information such that a warrant is required to obtain it v. a subpoena duces tecum. United States v. Brooks, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40561 (3d Cir. Dec. 29, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: No REP in cell phone subscriber records

CA9: Gratuitous dog bite can be excessive force; no QI here

“Our precedent clearly establishes that releasing a police dog to bite a person who neither endangers officers nor attempts to flee or resist arrest violates that person’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure. … Viewing the evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on CA9: Gratuitous dog bite can be excessive force; no QI here

CA3: Presumption of QI where magistrate issues SW

There is a presumption qualified immunity applies where a magistrate has signed off on a search warrant. Handy v. Palmiero, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 37862 (3d Cir. Dec. 4, 2020):

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Presumption of QI where magistrate issues SW

IN: Hard ball in pocket during frisk was immediately apparent it was drugs

A casino enforcement agent told defendant he had to be patted down before their sitting in an interview room. A round ball was felt in defendant’s pocket, and it was immediately apparent to the officer from training and experience that … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IN: Hard ball in pocket during frisk was immediately apparent it was drugs

CA5: Hitting a man on ground in fetal position 26 times stated claim

Allegations of police beating a man 26 times lying in the fetal position was enough to overcome qualified immunity. “Though Joseph was not suspected of committing any crime, was in the fetal position, and was not actively resisting, Officers Martin … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Hitting a man on ground in fetal position 26 times stated claim

Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason

Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason by Jacob Sullum:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason

CA6: State officer assisting a federal search is the subject of assault under 18 U.S.C. § 1114

A state officer assisting federal officers in a search can be the subject of assault while executing a warrant under 18 U.S.C. § 1114. United States v. Scurry, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35068 (6th Cir. Nov. 5, 2020). Defendant officers … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: State officer assisting a federal search is the subject of assault under 18 U.S.C. § 1114

CA8: Ptf stated a claim for false arrest and detention without PC

Plaintiff was arrested and detained for three weeks without probable cause. Taking his claims as true at this point, he stated a claim. Bell v. Neukirch, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 33920 (8th Cir. Oct. 28, 2020):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Ptf stated a claim for false arrest and detention without PC