IN: Hard ball in pocket during frisk was immediately apparent it was drugs

A casino enforcement agent told defendant he had to be patted down before their sitting in an interview room. A round ball was felt in defendant’s pocket, and it was immediately apparent to the officer from training and experience that it was drugs. Removal of the ball was reasonable. Johnson v. State, 2020 Ind. LEXIS 929 (Dec. 1, 2020).

“Although our decision in Brewster v. Beck, 859 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir. 2017), may suggest that the government might violate the Fourth Amendment by interfering with one’s property even after conducting a lawful seizure, we decided Brewster three years after the allegedly unlawful conduct here. It thus fails to show the law was clearly established at the time the Los Angeles Police Department officers destroyed Wright’s firearms. Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 741 (2011) (stating law must be clearly established ‘at the time of the challenged conduct’).” Wright v. Beck, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 37465 (9th Cir. Dec. 1, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.