Daily Archives: August 27, 2026

CAAF: Information on computer stored in evidence room wasn’t stale

The military judge erred in concluding that a search warrant for computer information became stale. It was essentially frozen without change while in the government’s custody. United States v. Armour, 2026 CAAF LEXIS 712 (C.A.A.F. Aug. 24, 2026). There was … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, DNA, Staleness | Comments Off on CAAF: Information on computer stored in evidence room wasn’t stale

CAAF: SW’s incorporated affidavit satisfied particularity, reliance on CA10 case not CAAF case was error

The military judge’s restrictive determination of particularity to exclude evidence while relying on a Tenth Circuit case instead of precedent from this court was an abuse of discretion. The incorporated affidavit was sufficient to show probable cause and particularity under … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Military searches, Particularity | Comments Off on CAAF: SW’s incorporated affidavit satisfied particularity, reliance on CA10 case not CAAF case was error

CA10: Def’s BO suggesting heroin abuse added to RS

The officer here detected defendant’s body odor as coming from heroin use, despite his lack of specific training. That was enough to order defendant out of the car and reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Marshall, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s BO suggesting heroin abuse added to RS

WaPo: They confided in ChatGPT. Their secrets ended up in court.

WaPo: They confided in ChatGPT. Their secrets ended up in court. By Miriam Waldvogeland Gerrit De Vynck:

Posted in AI | Comments Off on WaPo: They confided in ChatGPT. Their secrets ended up in court.

CA6: No interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

There is no interlocutory appeal of denial of a motion to suppress in the federal system. United States v. Cox, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 25677 (6th Cir. Aug. 24, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not making a frivolous motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: No interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress