Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable and “not excessively intrusive.” McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 172 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026). “Valdivia counters that [the officer’s] … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

S.D.N.Y.: Investigative medical exams implicate 4A

“The Fourth Amendment is implicated when medical examinations are undertaken at the initiative of a state official for an investigatory purpose. See Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581, 606 (2d Cir. 1999) (holding that the Fourth Amendment applies to ‘searches … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Investigative medical exams implicate 4A

W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

No clear line of cases suggests the officer’s searching inside plaintiff’s underwear was unreasonable where it was not seen by anyone else. “Plaintiff’s right to be free from such a search was not clearly established at that time and Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

Kavanaugh Stops #4

Reason: Did Brett Kavanaugh Just Apologize for Butchering the Fourth Amendment? Maybe. by Damon Root (“Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice”):

Posted in immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Kavanaugh Stops #4

Slate: Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late.

Slate: Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late. By Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern:

Posted in immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Slate: Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late.

CA11: ALPR showing short round trip to Atlanta supported stop with RS

On plain error review, it can’t be said there was no reasonable suspicion whatsoever essentially based on a license plate reader that the car’s round trip to Atlanta was suspiciously short. Thus, “we cannot say that the district court committed … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: ALPR showing short round trip to Atlanta supported stop with RS

MI: Officer seeing def drunk an hour before he was driving was a reasonable conclusion

The district court erred in suppressing by finding no probable cause for a stop. “Because we conclude that Officer Prater’s observations of defendant in a drunken state no more than one hour before the stop furnished the officer with reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Officer seeing def drunk an hour before he was driving was a reasonable conclusion

HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

Where the defense didn’t argue a lack of probable cause at the suppression hearing, that could not be raised on appeal. State v. Arbogast, 2025 Haw. App. LEXIS 617 (Dec. 23, 2025) (unpublished).* Defendant’s stop was reasonable and his spontaneous … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

The officer here violated clearly established law by taking too long to apply for a warrant to search plaintiff’s cell phone. Plaintiff promptly sought its return, but that was denied because the officer hadn’t got a warrant yet. Langham v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

Pennsylvania’s automobile exception is more stringent than the Fourth Amendment requiring exigency. The state can’t end run a refusal to consent by impounding a car to get into it. Commonwealth v. Rosario, 2025 PA Super 286 (Dec. 23, 2025). “First, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

SCOTUS: Kavanaugh says immigration stops still require RS

Trump v. Illinois, 2025 U.S. LEXIS 4766 (U.S. Dec. 23, 2025), involving the President calling up the National Guard in Illinois, the government failed to prove an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. [At first, I elected to omit this, … Continue reading

Posted in immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Kavanaugh says immigration stops still require RS

D.Minn.: No duty for officer to resolve traffic stop questions before safety concerns resolved

“All of these questions lasted fewer than thirty seconds–they did not ‘measurably extend’ the stop. Johnson, 555 U.S. at 333. Ali cites no law that suggests that officers must address the traffic infraction before they may ask questions related to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No duty for officer to resolve traffic stop questions before safety concerns resolved

CA6: Reference to water emoji 💦with dual meaning not a Franks violation

“Swanagan did not make an adequate preliminary showing that Budde’s interpretation of the water emoji was intentionally or recklessly false, so the district court did not clearly err in finding the affidavit truthful. Swanagan asserts that he ‘provided dictionary support … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Reference to water emoji 💦with dual meaning not a Franks violation

N.-M.Ct.Crim.App.: Joint investigation by Belgium and Navy in NATO forces of murder of service member’s spouse by the service member was not improper

Defendant was in the Navy with NATO forces and questioned by Belgian authorities under their law for murder of his wife. This was not an improper joint investigation because both Belgium and the United States had jurisdiction over his crime. … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.-M.Ct.Crim.App.: Joint investigation by Belgium and Navy in NATO forces of murder of service member’s spouse by the service member was not improper

NC: No standing in someone else’s cell phone pinged to find defendant

Defendant used someone else’s cell phone and officers pinged it to find him. He had no standing for the borrowed phone. After arrest, he admitted the shooting in a jail call. “Defendant’s temporary use of the phone does not automatically … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NC: No standing in someone else’s cell phone pinged to find defendant

E.D.Pa.: Cell phone can’t be seized on RS and exigency then wait four days to get a SW

“The question before this Court today is whether a police officer who conducts a Terry stop can seize the smartphone of a suspect without a warrant and hold it for four days before obtaining a warrant, where the suggested exigency … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Cell phone can’t be seized on RS and exigency then wait four days to get a SW

CA4: Short interaction in high crime area in daytime wasn’t RS

A short interaction in a high crime area in daytime wasn’t reasonable suspicion, even when the passenger and driver didn’t have the same story. United States v. Hawkins, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32455 (4th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Short interaction in high crime area in daytime wasn’t RS

W.D.La.: Can’t be ineffective for not arguing state constitution in federal criminal case

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing the state constitution in a federal criminal case. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256220 (W.D. La. Dec. 10, 2025). “Here, the affidavit detailed the information on which the officer relied, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Can’t be ineffective for not arguing state constitution in federal criminal case

TX12: When passenger was ordered out of car and “couldn’t open” door, officer could

During a traffic stop, an object hanging inside the passenger door concerned the officer. The passenger claimed the door wouldn’t open from inside, so it was reasonable for the officer to open the door when ordering the passenger out. Penney … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Search | Comments Off on TX12: When passenger was ordered out of car and “couldn’t open” door, officer could

CA3: Going into a well-known drug house for 2 minutes was RS for stop

Defendant was frequenting a well-known drug house. He went in for less than two minutes and came out. The stop was with reasonable suspicion. The patdown revealed a wad of cash by plain feel. United States v. Thomas, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Going into a well-known drug house for 2 minutes was RS for stop