CA3: Going into a well-known drug house for 2 minutes was RS for stop

Defendant was frequenting a well-known drug house. He went in for less than two minutes and came out. The stop was with reasonable suspicion. The patdown revealed a wad of cash by plain feel. United States v. Thomas, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32413 (3d Cir. Dec. 11, 2025) (Emil Bove’s first opinion?).

Defendant’s stop is found to lack reasonable suspicion. The court recounts everything and concludes the officer was making assumptions and just wasn’t believable on the critical factual issues. United States v. Flores-Mendivil, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 254339 (D. Ariz. Dec. 9, 2025).*

There was no Fourth Amendment violation, let alone an egregious one, to suppress an immigration search. Duran-Serrano v. Bondi, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32378 (9th Cir. Dec. 9, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.