Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA5: Heien objective reasonableness applies to a stop for driving too slow even though it was just def’s car in traffic

Driving too slow for too long justifies a stop, at least Heien makes it reasonable: “Given the dearth of authority on whether a single vehicle constitutes traffic …, the ambiguity in the statute, and the danger observed by the officer, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Heien objective reasonableness applies to a stop for driving too slow even though it was just def’s car in traffic

N.D.Tex.: Not material to not mention def’s state of mind hours before the occurrence

Defendant claimed a Franks violation from the officer’s failure to include things that were true about defendant before things went south that night. It wasn’t material to defendant’s state of mind at the time of the occurrence. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Not material to not mention def’s state of mind hours before the occurrence

CA8: Dist.Ct. erred in finding no RS for extending stop; there was, and it ripened to PC

The district court erred in finding there was no reasonable suspicion for extending the stop. “We have found a combination of nervous behavior and suspicious travel plans creates a reasonable suspicion justifying a traffic stop’s extension. … In the protective … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Dist.Ct. erred in finding no RS for extending stop; there was, and it ripened to PC

E.D.N.C.: “[R]easonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” Navarette

A brief meeting for what could only be described by the officer, in his experience, was likely a hand-to-hand sale in a high crime area reasonable suspicion for a stop. “Other suggested explanations by defendant, such as that defendant may … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: “[R]easonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” Navarette

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: What is “individualized” suspicion?

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: What is “individualized” suspicion? by Orin S. Kerr:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: What is “individualized” suspicion?

N.D.Miss.: Uncontradicted testimony that a DL checkpoint was validly set up makes checkpoint valid; plain view sustained

The state set up a driver’s license and safety checkpoint, and defendant was stopped there. He doesn’t contradict the officer’s testimony that it was set up by supervisory persons and was limited in time and scope. The stop was thus … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Uncontradicted testimony that a DL checkpoint was validly set up makes checkpoint valid; plain view sustained

D.Conn.: Arrest by bathroom door permits look into bathroom under protective sweep

Defendant was arrested in his apartment, right at the bathroom door, and looking in the bathroom was permitted by the protective sweep doctrine. In there, powder from drugs was visible in plain view. United States v. Ovalle, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Arrest by bathroom door permits look into bathroom under protective sweep

S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

“Ward also argues that the traffic stop was extended by placing him in the back of the police cruiser. … However, the officer(s) needed to walk back to the police cruiser in order to complete the mission of issuing a … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

E.D.N.Y.: That some NYPD cops are known to lie doesn’t mean these two are because the bodycams and physical evidence make them credible

“The circumstances of the stop, search, and seizure of Defendant demonstrate that there was a strong reasonable suspicion to support a stop and search of Defendant, and then probable cause to arrest him. [¶] Defendant’s main argument is that the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: That some NYPD cops are known to lie doesn’t mean these two are because the bodycams and physical evidence make them credible

E.D.N.C.: NC law requires RS for a supervision search, and here it’s lacking

North Carolina law requires reasonable suspicion for a supervision search, and here it was completely lacking. The motion to suppress is granted. United States v. Fuller, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202240 (E.D. N.C. Oct. 1, 2019).* State statute discusses concealed … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: NC law requires RS for a supervision search, and here it’s lacking

D.N.M.: Def’s car’s impoundment wasn’t justified by community caretaking function or need for inventory

The impoundment of defendant’s car wasn’t justified by either the community caretaking function or need for inventory. Whether the vehicle was even involved in a crime was inconclusive at best. United States v. Trujillo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201024 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Community caretaking function, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s car’s impoundment wasn’t justified by community caretaking function or need for inventory

MO: Exigency was shown at the motion to suppress, and more was shown at trial

The trial court denied the motion to suppress because the entry was by exigent circumstances. The trial testimony confirms it. State v. Bolden, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823 (Nov. 19, 2019).* The traffic stop was justified under state law, and, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Exigency was shown at the motion to suppress, and more was shown at trial

N.D.Ind.: The encounter started as consensual because the officer approached from the side to a parked car; RS developed

The encounter with the officer was not a seizure. She was parked five spaces away from defendant’s car and off to the side. When talking to defendant she saw a meth pipe in plain view. “The parties do not dispute … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: The encounter started as consensual because the officer approached from the side to a parked car; RS developed

OR: During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, state constitution prohibits asking for consent without justification

During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, the state constitution prohibits asking for consent without further justification. State v. Arreola-Botello, 365 Ore. 695, 2019 Ore. LEXIS 794 (Nov. 15, 2019), aff’g 292 Ore. App. 214, 418 P.3d 785 (2018) … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, state constitution prohibits asking for consent without justification

NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

Summary judgment against the defendants for false arrest and excessive force was improperly granted without considering the transcript of plaintiff’s criminal trial and the officers’ testimony there. Hernandez v Denny’s Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 08302, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

D.Kan.: Passenger’s flight from a car during a traffic stop is RS

A passenger’s flight from a car during a traffic stop is reasonable suspicion. United States v. Goines, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197656 (D. Kan. Nov. 14, 2019). The search warrant for defendant’s home was particular because it referenced Attachment B, … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Passenger’s flight from a car during a traffic stop is RS

D.Kan.: Michigan v. Long search of car on RS for a weapon called “protective sweep”

The officers had reasonable suspicion to believe there was a weapon in the car justifying a “protective sweep” of the car under Michigan v. Long. United States v. Alexander, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197653 (D. Kan. Nov. 14, 2019). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Michigan v. Long search of car on RS for a weapon called “protective sweep”

MD: MTA “fare sweep” resulted in def’s detention without RS

A “fare sweep” on an MTA train in Baltimore led to defendant being detained. Officers ran his name and found a record. At a station, a scuffle ensued, one of the officers shouted “gun” and defendant was wrestled to the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on MD: MTA “fare sweep” resulted in def’s detention without RS

FL2: Anonymous calls about a pick-up truck driving slowly around the block in the middle of the night in a residential low crime area wasn’t RS

Officers received two anonymous calls about a dark pickup truck with a loud muffler on a residential street in the middle of the night. Once it stopped in the street for a few seconds and then pulled off and turned … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on FL2: Anonymous calls about a pick-up truck driving slowly around the block in the middle of the night in a residential low crime area wasn’t RS

D.Mass.: Border searches of electronic devices are non-routine, and they require reasonable suspicion

Border searches of electronic devices are non-routine, and they require reasonable suspicion. Alasaad v. NielsenAlasaad v. Nielsen, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195556 (D. Mass. Nov. 12, 2019):

Posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Border searches of electronic devices are non-routine, and they require reasonable suspicion