Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

S.D.Ill.: The delay in the stop was def’s own stalling

The stop was prolonged but it was defendant’s own stalling, so Rodriguez wasn’t violated. “The fact that Thompson and Dwyer did not issue any ticket for the window tinting or the obstructed brake lights is not relevant to the question … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: The delay in the stop was def’s own stalling

MA: Obtaining and executing arrest warrant in middle of night for a rash of burglaries was reasonable

Police were investigating a rash of burglaries, and woke up a magistrate in the middle of the night to get an arrest warrant for defendant. Officers went to arrest him and others were seeking a search warrant. At his apartment, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Obtaining and executing arrest warrant in middle of night for a rash of burglaries was reasonable

IL: Def’s leaving house to deliver to a controlled buy was nexus for house

There was nexus for the search warrant for defendant’s house where he was alleged to have left his house and driven directly to the scene of a controlled buy where he was delivering. People v. Teague, 2019 IL App (3d) … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Def’s leaving house to deliver to a controlled buy was nexus for house

N.D.Ohio & S.D.Miss.: SW including “any vehicle on the premises” is still particular

A search warrant that authorized the search of “any vehicle on the premises” was not unparticular because it allowed searches of visitor’s cars too. Plenty of cases already hold that “any vehicle on the premises” is particular. Moreover, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio & S.D.Miss.: SW including “any vehicle on the premises” is still particular

OH5: It was reasonable to run the dog around a car in a traffic stop where it happened without extending the stop during waiting time

The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress where the officer ran the dog around the car within the time of the normal traffic stop. Therefore, the traffic stop was not illegally extended because the purpose … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: It was reasonable to run the dog around a car in a traffic stop where it happened without extending the stop during waiting time

CO: DHS caseworkers subject to 4A in their warrantless entry

State DHS case workers are subject to the Fourth Amendment, and their warrantless entry into defendant’s home was unreasonable. People v. Dyer, 2019 COA 161, 2019 Colo. App. LEXIS 1588 (Oct. 24, 2019). Probable cause for search of a car … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on CO: DHS caseworkers subject to 4A in their warrantless entry

OK: Officer’s excuse for extending the stop was pretext and violated Rodriguez

The officer’s claim that defendant’s log book wasn’t up to date was a mere pretext and subterfuge to unreasonably continue the stop in violation of Rodriguez. State v. Morgan, 2019 OK CR 26, 2019 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OK: Officer’s excuse for extending the stop was pretext and violated Rodriguez

N.D.Ohio: Criminal acts on premises is not a waiver of a REP in it

Defendant did not own the premises searched, but he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in it because of his connection to it. Also, criminal acts on the premises is not a waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy. Minnesota … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Criminal acts on premises is not a waiver of a REP in it

OR: A question to a fidgety driver about weapons in the car didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

Defendant was pulled over after passing a parked police car three times, and the officer seeing the tags were expired on the third pass. When defendant was pulled over, he was unusually fidgety. A question about weapons in the car … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: A question to a fidgety driver about weapons in the car didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

OH5: Staleness argument fails as to ongoing MJ grow operation

Information about a marijuana grow operation was ongoing by its nature, so staleness is more flexible as to it and information can be older. Also, the good faith exception would apply. State v. Laubacher, 2019-Ohio-4271, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4343 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Staleness argument fails as to ongoing MJ grow operation

IL: Merely radioing for a drug dog did not materially extend a stop that was only 3 minutes long

This case is on post-conviction, and defendant attached a police report to his petition. Based on the police report, the mere act of radioing for a drug dog did not appreciably extend the stop which took three minutes. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Merely radioing for a drug dog did not materially extend a stop that was only 3 minutes long

OH: On LPN check, car not matching color on registration is enough for a stop to see if it’s stolen

“When an officer encounters a vehicle the whole of which is painted a different color from the color listed in the vehicle-registration records and the officer believes, based on his experience, that the vehicle or its displayed license plates may … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH: On LPN check, car not matching color on registration is enough for a stop to see if it’s stolen

CA7: Airbnb tenant who was theft victim can consent to police entry to rental unit

Plaintiff’s Airbnb tenant suffered a theft, and he had the authority to consent to an entry by police to investigate it. Wonsey v. City of Chicago, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 30651 (7th Cir. Oct. 15, 2019).* The officer didn’t prolong … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Airbnb tenant who was theft victim can consent to police entry to rental unit

TN: Possession of meth in truck many months earlier wasn’t PC to believe it’s there now

Defendant’s alleged possession of methamphetamine in his truck many months earlier was not probable cause to believe it could still be there at the time of the search. Defendant’s possession of a meth pipe, however, gave cause to search the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on TN: Possession of meth in truck many months earlier wasn’t PC to believe it’s there now

CA6: Merely alleging pat-down search was done “without a legitimate reason” doesn’t state a 4A claim; more required

“Merely alleging that Jones’ conducting pat-down searches ‘without a legitimate reason’ is insufficient to state a plausible claim of a Fourth Amendment violation. Under the Fourth Amendment, ‘[t]he touchstone of whether a given search or seizure is reasonable is whether … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Merely alleging pat-down search was done “without a legitimate reason” doesn’t state a 4A claim; more required

MD: License plate reader’s alert of lack of insurance was RS for stop

The trooper’s license plate reader scan showed defendant’s vehicle had no insurance on file. That was reasonable suspicion for the stop. Gary v. State, 2019 Md. App. LEXIS 870 (Oct. 9, 2019). Also,

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: License plate reader’s alert of lack of insurance was RS for stop

S.D.Ga.: It was reasonable to stop defendant and inquire where def was parked next to a dilapidated building

Defendant’s stop for parking near a dilapidated maybe abandoned structure was reasonable because the officers were justified in inquiring who he was and what he was doing. In their experience, this activity supported at least an inference that defendant might … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: It was reasonable to stop defendant and inquire where def was parked next to a dilapidated building

N.D.Ind.: Arrest outside motel room still permitted protective sweep where there was RS someone else was there

Defendant was arrested outside his motel room, but that did not bar a protective sweep of the motel room where the officers had reason to believe others could be present. Baldwin v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175253 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Arrest outside motel room still permitted protective sweep where there was RS someone else was there

ID: State’s claim of exigency for warrantless entry into house was unsupported; suppression affirmed

Defendant was allegedly selling tainted marijuana from his house. Police did a warrantless entry with exigency as the excuse. There wasn’t any claim that anybody inside was in distress, and no questions about it. Suppression affirmed. State v. Sessions, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: State’s claim of exigency for warrantless entry into house was unsupported; suppression affirmed

D.Nev.: Govt’s stated intent to forfeit requires motion for return of property be denied

Motion for return of property seized five weeks ago is denied. The government will image electronics and return them. That which is subject to forfeiture has to await it. United States v. Wells, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168017 (D. Nev. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Govt’s stated intent to forfeit requires motion for return of property be denied