Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA6: Second officer’s running wants and warrants on passenger didn’t delay the first officer’s stop

A second officer running warrants on detainees from a justified vehicle stop did not have anything to do with the original mission of the stop. “Officer Hogan questioned the passenger while Officer Holland dealt with Brewer, and we do not … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Second officer’s running wants and warrants on passenger didn’t delay the first officer’s stop

VA: Owner’s suspended DL supported stop under Glover

Officers had reasonable suspicion under Glover to believe the driver of a vehicle was the owner who had a suspended DL. Mitchell v. Commonwealth, 2021 Va. App. LEXIS 89 (June 8, 2021). “Calvert’s comments to police to shoot him and … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Owner’s suspended DL supported stop under Glover

N.D.Ill.: Arrest in common area of apt building not on curtilage

Defendant’s arrest in a common area of an apartment building was not on the curtilage. United States v. Anderson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106278 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2021). Defendant’s Franks challenge fails as to what was omitted from the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Arrest in common area of apt building not on curtilage

PA: Reasonable inference for stop that owner with suspended DL was driving vehicle

The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s vehicle on the inference that the driver was the owner who had an outstanding warrant. The court declines to adopt a higher standard for reasonable suspicion under the state constitution. Commonwealth v. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on PA: Reasonable inference for stop that owner with suspended DL was driving vehicle

CA8: GPS info can provide RS as to def’s location whether or not it’s admissible at trial

GPS information as to defendant’s location can be reasonable suspicion despite defendant’s claims it might not be admissible at trial. United States v. Martin, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16822 (8th Cir. June 7, 2021):

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: GPS info can provide RS as to def’s location whether or not it’s admissible at trial

WI: Holding def’s DL without RS made the stop unreasonable while drug dog was summoned

“On the certified question, we conclude that the answer depends on the totality of circumstances surrounding an encounter. Further, while VanBeek was not seized when Officer Oetzel took her driver’s license to run a records check, VanBeek was seized when … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Holding def’s DL without RS made the stop unreasonable while drug dog was summoned

D.Kan.: Delayed stop and furtive movements justified vehicle frisk

“The Court concludes that the protective sweep exception applies. When the officers first attempted to pull Canada over, Canada took an abnormal amount of time to stop his vehicle, despite a clear roadway with no obstructions. The officers testified that … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Delayed stop and furtive movements justified vehicle frisk

WV: Exclusionary rule would not be applied in administrative child abuse proceeding for protection of children

The exclusionary rule does not apply to child abuse allegations in administrative proceedings. The court declines the request to apply it despite the rule that it doesn’t apply in civil cases generally because of harm to the children. In re … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on WV: Exclusionary rule would not be applied in administrative child abuse proceeding for protection of children

CA8: Visitor’s property could be searched under warrant for host’s place on RS they were involved in drugs, too

Defendant was a visitor at a friend’s house when the house was searched under a warrant for drugs. She was on the couch with a meth pipe next to her, so it was reasonable to search her lockbox under the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Visitor’s property could be searched under warrant for host’s place on RS they were involved in drugs, too

CA6: Detention with handcuffing on RS permitted putting def in police car

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s detention, including putting him in a police car while they sorted it out. That was not yet an arrest. United States v. Rogers, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16160 (6th Cir. May 27, 2021). The … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA6: Detention with handcuffing on RS permitted putting def in police car

N.D.Ill.: Pointing a gun isn’t a seizure, but def’s raising hands made it one

Defendant wasn’t seized just by the officer pointing a gun at him; it was when he raised his hands and submitted. “Here, because the officers were responding to a call about an individual with a firearm and Officer Davis reasonably … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Pointing a gun isn’t a seizure, but def’s raising hands made it one

W.D.Mo.: “Criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions

The officer’s reference to “criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions. Therefore, the court finds no Franks violation. Even striking that reference leaves probable cause. United States v. Woody, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100605 (W.D. Mo. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: “Criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions

CA6: Misdescription of alleged robber was close enough for RS for stop

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. “But the touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness, not perfection. See Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54, 60-61, 135 S. Ct. 530, 190 L. Ed. 2d 475 (2014). The facts reported … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Misdescription of alleged robber was close enough for RS for stop

E.D.Mich.: Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t permit the officer to open the door for him

Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t enable the officer to open the door for him. “As explained above, however, Trooper Miller’s stated purpose included an investigatory motive—verifying whether ‘something’ had been concealed—and his … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t permit the officer to open the door for him

OH10: Officers don’t need RS to approach someone on the street

Officers don’t need reasonable suspicion to approach a person for a potential consensual encounter. State v. Howard, 2021-Ohio-1792, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1734 (10th Dist. May 25, 2021). Defendant’s Facebook Live posting of him holding an AK-47 and smoking marijuana … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Officers don’t need RS to approach someone on the street

CA6: Disclosure of medical records to LEO by subpoena duces tecum doesn’t violate 4A

“[T]he disclosure of the plaintiffs’ medical records to law enforcement officers for the purpose of investigating Dr. Pompy’s allegedly illegal activities did not violate their Fourth Amendment rights or their constitutional right to privacy.” Micks-Harm v. Nichols, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA6: Disclosure of medical records to LEO by subpoena duces tecum doesn’t violate 4A

CA10: Nexus for CP can logically move when def does

Police had probable cause defendant uploaded child pornography from home. Then he moved. It was reasonable to assume his computers went with him to the new address, so nexus was sufficiently shown for probable cause there. United States v. Kilgore, … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA10: Nexus for CP can logically move when def does

AZ: Even if NCMEC was not private actor, it didn’t expand the prior private search

In Arizona, Fourth Amendment claims are decided first, then state constitutional claims. Google+, acting completely on its own, searched defendant’s photos folder stored with there. Moreover, it was only shown to be protecting its private business interests, not aid the … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on AZ: Even if NCMEC was not private actor, it didn’t expand the prior private search

NY1: Pretrial detainee doesn’t have equal protection right not to have jail calls recorded

A pretrial detainee at Riker’s Island didn’t have an equal protection right or a reasonable expectation of privacy in his telephone calls from the jail. People v. Jennings, 2021 NY Slip Op 03262, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3363 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: Pretrial detainee doesn’t have equal protection right not to have jail calls recorded

NY3: Dog sniff of person requires RS

On a matter of first impression, NY’s Third Department concludes that reasonable suspicion is required for a dog sniff of the person, and here there was reasonable suspicion. People v. Butler, 2021 NY Slip Op 03222, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Dog sniff of person requires RS