Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

The forensic search of a cell phone can occur anytime between seizure and trial and still be timely. State v. Lowry, 2025 La. LEXIS 1481 (La. Oct. 25, 2025). 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel challenge for Franks violation fails for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

D.P.R.: USMJ doesn’t buy officer’s RS story

USMJ just doesn’t buy that the officer could see drugs in defendant’s hand when he was running. After the stop, they were all in his pockets. United States v. Méndez-Rodríguez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209314 (D.P.R. Oct. 22, 2025)*:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.P.R.: USMJ doesn’t buy officer’s RS story

CA5: A-C privilege review of seized email doesn’t have to be perfect

In this bank fraud case, the attorney-client privilege review of defendant’s email was “imperfect” but not so bad that the indictment should be dismissed. It clearly doesn’t rise to the level of “outrageous.” Yes, the review could have been done … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, E-mail, Privileges, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: A-C privilege review of seized email doesn’t have to be perfect

D.S.C.: RS is based on objective reasonableness, and don’t argue subjective intent contradictorily

For reasonable suspicion the standard is objective reasonableness. Here, the defendant argued subjective intent two ways: embracing it and rejecting it. United States v. Duggan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206037 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 2025)*:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.C.: RS is based on objective reasonableness, and don’t argue subjective intent contradictorily

S.D.N.Y.: Accidental seizure of attorney-client jail calls doesn’t lead to exclusion of non-legal calls

Use of plaintiff’s non-privileged prison calls as evidence was not a Fourth Amendment violation. The fact attorney-client calls were also seized but were segregated and not used as evidence doesn’t state a claim. Criscuolo v. Brandow, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Accidental seizure of attorney-client jail calls doesn’t lead to exclusion of non-legal calls

E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

There is no Fourth Amendment claim by a dead person. “Because the investigation failures and denial of access to the Courts are based on facts alleged to have occurred entirely after decedent’s death, Plaintiff cannot assert these claims either on … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

MSNBC: Just how many ‘Kavanaugh stops’ have American citizens been forced to endure?

MSNBC: Just how many ‘Kavanaugh stops’ have American citizens been forced to endure? by Steve Benen (“Many American citizens have been detained recently by ICE agents who thought they might be undocumented immigrants. But how many is ‘many’? When the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MSNBC: Just how many ‘Kavanaugh stops’ have American citizens been forced to endure?

S.D.N.Y.: No REP in one’s talking to oneself in a building elevator that security cameras picked up

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in talking to himself in his building elevator. Therefore, Title III didn’t apply. He knew there was video recording but not audio. “While in the elevator, Plaintiff writes that that is when he … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No REP in one’s talking to oneself in a building elevator that security cameras picked up

TX3: Failure to swear application for electronic warrant was fatal defect

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the officer who prepared an electronic BAC warrant in the patrol car was not sworn to tell the truth based on the body cam. That was a fatal defect. … Continue reading

Posted in Oath or affirmation, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on TX3: Failure to swear application for electronic warrant was fatal defect

W.D.Ky.: No requirement cell phone search protocol be specified in the SW

There is no requirement in the Sixth Circuit for a cell phone search protocol to be specified in the search warrant. United States v. Lanham, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202782 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 14, 2025). There was probable cause defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: No requirement cell phone search protocol be specified in the SW

E.D.Mich.: Frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable

A frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable. United States v. Davis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202764 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2025). When a stop revealed a holster when the defendant got out of the vehicle, a further intrusion … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Frisk that went inside defendant’s pants was unreasonable

PR Const. on evidentiary exclusion for 4A violation applies in forfeiture cases

Under the Puerto Rico Constitution, unlawfully seized evidence is inadmissible, and this includes forfeiture cases. Cruz v. Commonwealth 2025 PR App. LEXIS 2293 (Sept. 23, 2025). The probable cause question here doesn’t have to be decided. Suffice it to say … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on PR Const. on evidentiary exclusion for 4A violation applies in forfeiture cases

E.D.Ky.: If cell phone warrant is overbroad, remedy is to suppress the overbroad part, not all

“Assuming, without deciding, that the Cellphone Warrant was overbroad due to lack of a timeframe limitation, this finding would not mean that all evidence seized under the cellphone warrant is subject to suppression. The proper remedy is to suppress only … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: If cell phone warrant is overbroad, remedy is to suppress the overbroad part, not all

W.D.Wash.: Putting meth in a public trash can was abandonment, not just hiding it

Putting meth in a public trash can was treated as abandonment, not hiding it for later. United States v. Denham, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201311 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 10, 2025). Use of a cell phone to deposit stolen checks supported … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Putting meth in a public trash can was abandonment, not just hiding it

CA8: While the nexus showing was weak, GFE still applied

This affidavit for search warrant didn’t show nexus, but it wasn’t so lacking that the good faith exception didn’t apply. Some information was provided, and it was more than in cases where it was lacking. United States v. Diaz, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Independent source, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: While the nexus showing was weak, GFE still applied

FL2: Vehicle searches based on MJ smell occurring before change in law valid by GFE

While the smell of cannabis is no longer justification for a vehicle search, searches prior to the date the law changed are valid under the good faith exception. Williams v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 7538 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on FL2: Vehicle searches based on MJ smell occurring before change in law valid by GFE

CA5: A trespasser has no REP

A trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy when on the property trespassed upon. Here, there were numerous signs for the TX DOT saying “no trespassing.” United States v. Parkerson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26220 (5th Cir. Oct. 8, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: A trespasser has no REP

CA2: One has to preserve the 4A claim for a conditional plea

Defendant didn’t properly preserve his Fourth Amendment claim for appeal from a conditional plea. United States v. Smurphat, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26002 (2d Cir. Oct. 7, 2025). “A search warrant limited to a single dwelling apartment is sufficiently particular … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA2: One has to preserve the 4A claim for a conditional plea

W.D.Wis.: Lack of info on CI’s credibility wasn’t material; PC shown otherwise

The affidavit for warrant omitted pertinent details about the CI’s credibility and apparent baggage, but it doesn’t matter: “And yet, the pertinent facts provided by Hample were corroborated by other information, including text messages, phone records, location tracking, and surveillance. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Lack of info on CI’s credibility wasn’t material; PC shown otherwise

CO: In a civil case, legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense

“In a case of first impression, a division of the court of appeals holds that legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense that the defendant must prove in a civil action under section 13-21-131, C.R.S. 2025. The … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: In a civil case, legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense