Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

OH7: Search incident proper after concealed weapon found on def

Defendant was searched and arrested for a concealed weapon. That did not prohibit the officers from further searching his personal effects in his clothes. State v. Zepernick, 2021-Ohio-719, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 724 (7th Dist. Mar. 4, 2021). 2254 petitioner’s … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH7: Search incident proper after concealed weapon found on def

W.D.Mo.: Govt moots motion to suppress by deciding not to use challenged evidence

When the defendant files a motion to suppress and the government elects not to use the evidence at trial, the motion becomes moot. United States v. Bowers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45445 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 11, 2021). Defendant’s 2255 for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Govt moots motion to suppress by deciding not to use challenged evidence

TX13: State showed exigency for BAC without SW because it would have taken one of two officers off-duty

The state showed exigency in not getting a search warrant for defendant’s BAC after a serious car crash left him unconscious. It would have taken hours to get the warrant back then [2013] and it would have taken one of … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX13: State showed exigency for BAC without SW because it would have taken one of two officers off-duty

CA9: DV victim, def’s wife, consented to search for firearms

Defendant’s wife called the police as a domestic violence victim, and she was found to have consented to a search of their garage and gun safe. She was emotional, considering what she’d been through, but consent wasn’t involuntary. She was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: DV victim, def’s wife, consented to search for firearms

CA7: Showing up for a controlled buy justifies automobile exception search

A prior controlled buy with defendant showing up for another one justifies a vehicle search under the automobile exception. United States v. Smith, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 6166 (7th Cir. Mar. 3, 2021). The trial court credited the officer’s testimony … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on CA7: Showing up for a controlled buy justifies automobile exception search

MA: No REP in unlocked basement of apt building

After a police foot chase, officers entered an unlocked basement of an apartment building and found a firearm that looked like one they were looking for. Defendant can’t show a reasonable expectation of privacy in the basement because everybody in … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MA: No REP in unlocked basement of apt building

CA10: Nexus shown to AZ residence where additional records were found

A search of a pain management doctor’s Arizona residence was based on nexus to his Wyoming medical practice. The government showed that patient records were in both places. United States v. Khan, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 5611 (10th Cir. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on CA10: Nexus shown to AZ residence where additional records were found

N.-M.: Military def counsel ineffective for not making a suppression motion that would have been granted

Military defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the command authorized inspection of his off-base private housing. The exigency justification proffered below had no factual basis for a search of defendant’s closet where a small grow operation was found. The … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.-M.: Military def counsel ineffective for not making a suppression motion that would have been granted

N.D.Tex.: Def counsel wasn’t obliged to argue a Franks issue to the jury at trial; that’s presumptively strategy

Defense counsel wasn’t obliged to raise a Franks issue in closing argument. That’s quintessentially a strategic decision. “The Supreme Court has recognized that ‘judicious selection of arguments for summation is a core exercise of defense counsel’s discretion,’ and counsel ‘is … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Def counsel wasn’t obliged to argue a Franks issue to the jury at trial; that’s presumptively strategy

OH8: Defense counsel made logical choice to forego suppression for benefit to merits of case

Defense counsel made a logical choice to exploit certain facts from the search in defense on the merits. “Given the tumultuous relationship between Lucas and Parker, given the fact that she shot at him through a door, given his admitted … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: Defense counsel made logical choice to forego suppression for benefit to merits of case

IA: Terry stop questioning doesn’t require a Miranda warning until it gets confrontational

Terry stop questioning doesn’t require a Miranda warning until it gets confrontational and adversarial and the detainee isn’t free to leave. State v. Decanini-Hernandez, 2021 Iowa App. LEXIS 172 (Feb. 17, 2021). Defense counsel wasn’t shown to be ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IA: Terry stop questioning doesn’t require a Miranda warning until it gets confrontational

S.D.Ga.: Fact an officer knew of suspect from prior contact doesn’t preclude running name and dob for warrants

The fact an officer knew a suspect from prior interactions doesn’t mean that the officer can’t run the name and dob for warrants. New Covenant Church v. Futch, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22523 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 5, 2021). Defense counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Fact an officer knew of suspect from prior contact doesn’t preclude running name and dob for warrants

N.D.Ind.: Week old crime justified detention on RS

Defendant was a passenger in a car stopped and he was suspected of being involved in a shooting a week earlier. Even this old crime was sufficient for reasonable suspicion to extend the stop. United States v. Seymour, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Week old crime justified detention on RS

E.D.Wis.: No REP as to pole camera surveillance, one in an apt building hallway

Two surveillance cameras were installed; one on a pole, one in a hallway of an apartment building. Defendant, a visitor, had no reasonable expectation of privacy. A codefendant already litigated this motion and lost, and he should have acknowledged the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No REP as to pole camera surveillance, one in an apt building hallway

CA4: When lower court decides both PC and GFE, on appeal either one can be decided

When the district court decides both probable cause for issuance of the warrant and the good faith exception applies, the court of appeals need only decide one; here good faith. “Because our review of the record demonstrates that the affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: When lower court decides both PC and GFE, on appeal either one can be decided

OH7: Defense counsel’s strategic choice to not challenge search was reasonable; he exploited it in cross of the officers

Defense counsel’s strategic choice to not challenge a search and embrace the result of the search for cross-examination was reasonable. And it was justified because it resulted in acquittal on a big count. State v. Baker, 2020-Ohio-7023, 2020 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH7: Defense counsel’s strategic choice to not challenge search was reasonable; he exploited it in cross of the officers

CA10: Code enforcement officer coming to ptf’s door to talk to him didn’t violate curtilage

A city code enforcement officer who came to plaintiff’s door for a couple of minutes to attempt to talk to him about a sign code violation did not violate the curtilage. Clark v. City of Williamsburg, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA10: Code enforcement officer coming to ptf’s door to talk to him didn’t violate curtilage

W.D.N.C.: Def counsel not ineffective for not arguing Carpenter protects bank records because it doesn’t

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records such that the government needed a warrant to get them. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that there was such an interest. “Carpenter did not overrule Miller but merely … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def counsel not ineffective for not arguing Carpenter protects bank records because it doesn’t

E.D.Tenn.: Def’s car that others were known to drive being outside house of another wasn’t reasonable belief he was there

Officers did not have a reasonable belief defendant was on the premises of another just because he was seen there a month earlier and what was somewhat believed to be his car was parked out outside just before the entry. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def’s car that others were known to drive being outside house of another wasn’t reasonable belief he was there

CA6: CoA denied for federal defense counsel not pursuing claim SW violated state law

CoA denied for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel didn’t investigate the claim that the state court search warrant hadn’t been properly issued and then filed and was thus invalid. It wouldn’t be because there was essentially … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: CoA denied for federal defense counsel not pursuing claim SW violated state law