Category Archives: Franks doctrine

IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

“[C]ourts have repeatedly and routinely held that a warrant that authorizes the search of ‘premises’ at a given residential address allows the search of detached garages, sheds, and other outbuildings even if these separate structures are not mentioned at all … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

D.Conn.: Consent finally given to show cooperation with LEOs was voluntary

Officers did not need probable cause to believe defendant would be at his address, just a reasonable belief to execute an arrest warrant. After the arrest, he refused repeatedly consent and insisted on a warrant. While officers were off getting … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Consent finally given to show cooperation with LEOs was voluntary

IA: Failure to cite state constitution to trial court was a waiver

A state wildlife officer approached defendant at a boat ramp during ice fishing season. No lights; car not blocked or pulled over. It was not a “stop.” The officer approached only to see if defendant had a fishing license, and … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Failure to cite state constitution to trial court was a waiver

NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress, and it was denied because defendant did not show he was anything other than a transient guest in the premises. An affidavit from the owner was presented the day of the plea that … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

CA8: Where driveway encircles house and car parked in back, curtilage not violated

Officers did not violate the curtilage by driving down a road looking for somebody when they came upon a house with a driveway that went around it, and the only car was parked behind it. They parked there and encountered … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Nighttime search | Comments Off on CA8: Where driveway encircles house and car parked in back, curtilage not violated

E.D.Mich.: Where parole search required RS, anonymous tip consistent with other violation information was enough

A parole search under Michigan law only requires reasonable suspicion. An anonymous tip in the past has been held not enough. Here, however, the anonymous telephone tip was consistent with some of defendant’s parole violations, so here it’s enough. United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Where parole search required RS, anonymous tip consistent with other violation information was enough

W.D.Ky.: “Logical inferences cannot constitute false or misleading statements” for Franks purposes

Based on a jail call that confederates were “‘moving their stuff’ to the ‘new place’” it was a logical inference it was the place named in the search warrant. Defendant’s Franks challenge that the inference isn’t supportable fails. “Logical inferences … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: “Logical inferences cannot constitute false or misleading statements” for Franks purposes

CA2: Single incident of viewing CP on computer was not PC to believe CP on computer; GFE applies, however

A single access to child pornography from an IP address linked to defendant was not enough to find probable cause that the defendant had child pornography on the computer. The good faith exception, however, was sufficient to sustain the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Single incident of viewing CP on computer was not PC to believe CP on computer; GFE applies, however

D.Utah: Owner of the truck doesn’t always have standing in the trailer being pulled

Defendant had no standing in a stolen trailer even though he owned the truck pulling it. Similar is United States v. Abreu, 935 F.2d 1130, 1132 (10th Cir. 1991). United States v. Hayes, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22860 (D.Utah February … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Utah: Owner of the truck doesn’t always have standing in the trailer being pulled

W.D.N.Y.: Franks challenge to search warrant for house fails for lack of material omission

“The charges against Moran arise from an assault that occurred on May 31, 2006, and its alleged relationship to the Hell’s Angels Motorcycle Club, Rochester Charter (‘Hell’s Angels’), a purported enterprise within the meaning of the racketeering statute.” After an … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Franks challenge to search warrant for house fails for lack of material omission

CA6: Violation of some regulations may be “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation

There was probable cause for this § 1983 plaintiff’s arrest. While there may have been some violations of police regulations in how the controlled buy went down, a little “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation. Womack … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Violation of some regulations may be “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation

BLT: Florida Federal Prosecutor Disciplined Over Warrant Application

BLT: Florida Federal Prosecutor Disciplined Over Warrant Application by Zoe Tillman: A federal prosecutor in Florida was recently disciplined for providing false information to a U.S. magistrate judge’s secretary about a tracker warrant application.

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on BLT: Florida Federal Prosecutor Disciplined Over Warrant Application

D.Kan.: Omission of items from return not prejudicial; using footnotes in SW affidavit isn’t “hiding” information

First, defendant’s Franks argument fails. The negative information that he complains about not being more prominently displayed was “hidden” in a footnote in the 42 page affidavit. There is nothing that says that there can’t be information in footnotes. Second, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Omission of items from return not prejudicial; using footnotes in SW affidavit isn’t “hiding” information

Nexus: Drug dealer’s homes usually have the stash

Nexus to defendant’s house for a drug search warrant was established by his leaving his house to do drug deals then coming right home. It’s common for drug dealers to keep their stash at home. State v. Hogan, 2014 Tenn. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on Nexus: Drug dealer’s homes usually have the stash

Tech Crunch: Expert Witness For Silk Road Suggests FBI Lied About How They Accessed Back-End Servers

Tech Crunch: Expert Witness For Silk Road Suggests FBI Lied About How They Accessed Back-End Server by John Biggs: According to a court document released today, expert witness Joshua J. Horowitz, a lawyer and tech expert, believes the FBI is … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Tech Crunch: Expert Witness For Silk Road Suggests FBI Lied About How They Accessed Back-End Servers

D.Md.: Franks challenge successful but so limited it won’t help the defense much

The defense satisfied the court of a reckless omission of information about living arrangements in the house searched under the warrant, but the omission only leads to suppression of evidence from one room because that’s all the omission related to. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Md.: Franks challenge successful but so limited it won’t help the defense much

WA: Defendant was separated from his backpack, so it couldn’t be searched incident to arrest

During a Terry stop, the officer separated defendant from his backpack, and the backpack was searched about 10 minutes later when defendant was placed under arrest. The backpack was thus not on defendant’s person nor within his area of control … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on WA: Defendant was separated from his backpack, so it couldn’t be searched incident to arrest

CA7: Defense counsel’s security clearance doesn’t help see FISA material for Franks challenge

Just because defense counsel has security clearance, he doesn’t get to see all the material used in a FISA warrant for a Franks challenge. Balancing is required. On de novo review, defense counsel doesn’t get it. United States v. Daoud, … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: Defense counsel’s security clearance doesn’t help see FISA material for Franks challenge

CA4: False statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions

Officer’s false statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions in response. United States v. Saafir, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10847 (4th Cir. June 11, 2014). Nexus was shown to seize a murder and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on CA4: False statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions

E.D.Tex.: Officer’s testimony the falsity in the SW affidavit was a “mere mistake” good enough to overcome Franks

False statement in an affidavit was testified to being a “mere mistake” in reporting information so the good faith exception still applies. If the officer testified it was a “mere mistake,” well, then, it can’t be wilfully false. Thus, the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Officer’s testimony the falsity in the SW affidavit was a “mere mistake” good enough to overcome Franks