CA8: SW affidavit can’t be supplemented, but a revised one can be filed

In the Eighth Circuit at least, the government can’t supplement a search warrant affidavit. Here, however, they submitted a revised affidavit which clarified what amounts to an immaterial fact. Affirmed. United States v. Smith, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 26544 (8th Cir. Aug. 31, 2026).

There was no reasonable suspicion while the officer was first talking to defendant, but it developed when he saw the magazine to a gun sticking out of his hoodie pocket, and grabbed him and spun him around. His statements after that are not fruit of the poisonous tree. United States v. Davenport, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195653 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2026).*

2255 petitioner can’t show that defense counsel’s “further investigation could have revealed a deficiency which Defendant claims appears on the face of the warrant. Defendant has not shown that his counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate or challenge the search warrant before trial.” United States v. Sims, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195862 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 31, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Oath or affirmation, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.