Category Archives: Franks doctrine

N.D.Ill.: Removing drugs from a package with an already issued anticipatory warrant and not telling court wasn’t material to PC

There was no material falsity in the affidavit for the search warrant which mentioned 58 prior international shipments to defendant’s place. Specifically, the drugs were removed from the package for the anticipatory warrant and replaced with fake stuff after the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Removing drugs from a package with an already issued anticipatory warrant and not telling court wasn’t material to PC

D.Neb.: Def consented to a dog sniff, but there was RS anyway

The stop was based on a traffic violation, and reasonable suspicion developed for a dog sniff. In addition, defendant was asked to consent to a dog sniff and did: “When initially asked for consent, Defendant responded, ‘I guess so, I … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def consented to a dog sniff, but there was RS anyway

E.D.N.C.: Defendant doesn’t get additional discovery in his quest to get a Franks hearing

Defendant doesn’t get additional discovery in his quest to get a Franks hearing. He has the burden of going forward and of proof. And, even if what he says is true, the probable cause isn’t sufficiently undermined. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Defendant doesn’t get additional discovery in his quest to get a Franks hearing

OH5: Officer doesn’t need to be able to quote a statute in court to issue a ticket for violation of it

Even if the officer had an ulterior motive for defendant’s stop, it was based on probable cause of a traffic offense. The fact the officer couldn’t quote the statute in court doesn’t show that the stop was unreasonable or without … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Officer doesn’t need to be able to quote a statute in court to issue a ticket for violation of it

NJ: Trial court misapplied Franks without def even pleading Franks on an arrest warrant

The trial court erred in excising part of the affidavit for arrest on its description of the video of a shooting. Defendant chose not to file a Franks motion, and the video description shows that a person fired a gun … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NJ: Trial court misapplied Franks without def even pleading Franks on an arrest warrant

D.Nev.: Omission of CI’s felony conviction and motive to provide information justifies Franks hearing

“As further explained below, because the investigating detective’s omission of a tipster’s felony conviction for an offense bearing on his truthfulness in her affidavit supporting her application for a search warrant that led to the discovery of evidence on that … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Omission of CI’s felony conviction and motive to provide information justifies Franks hearing

N.D.Tex.: Not material to not mention def’s state of mind hours before the occurrence

Defendant claimed a Franks violation from the officer’s failure to include things that were true about defendant before things went south that night. It wasn’t material to defendant’s state of mind at the time of the occurrence. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Not material to not mention def’s state of mind hours before the occurrence

CA1: Ptf shows apparent Franks violation to survive SJ in § 1983 case

Defendants’ grant of summary judgment in a § 1983 case is reversed for a Franks violation in a theft case where plaintiff had a power of attorney over the property and the officer knew it and failed to disclose it … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA1: Ptf shows apparent Franks violation to survive SJ in § 1983 case

OH11: Failure to provide an inventory after a search is ministerial and not a fundamental right

“Even presuming no inventory was completed or provided to Thompson, however, this did not result in prejudice or provide any grounds for relief. It has been held that ‘the preparation and return of an inventory is ministerial’ and ‘does not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH11: Failure to provide an inventory after a search is ministerial and not a fundamental right

W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

Defendant challenged one sentence in the affidavit as a Franks violation, but it doesn’t even appear to be false. Moreover, even if that sentence were stricken, there still would be probable cause, and he fails in his burden of proof. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

CA11: Officer’s alleged lies to get arrest warrant denies QI

“With that in mind, we affirm the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. As indicated above, we accept for purposes of this appeal that Gill falsified information in the affidavits supporting his arrest warrants and therefore, he would not have … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer’s alleged lies to get arrest warrant denies QI

N.D.Ind.: The encounter started as consensual because the officer approached from the side to a parked car; RS developed

The encounter with the officer was not a seizure. She was parked five spaces away from defendant’s car and off to the side. When talking to defendant she saw a meth pipe in plain view. “The parties do not dispute … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: The encounter started as consensual because the officer approached from the side to a parked car; RS developed

IL: The scope of consent to search a car was exceeded, but it was because PC had developed

Officers exceeded the scope of defendant’s consent, but, by the time they did, they had probable cause under the automobile exception to search further. People v. Davis, 2019 IL App (1st) 160408, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 875 (Sept. 23, 2019),* … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: The scope of consent to search a car was exceeded, but it was because PC had developed

CA1 affirms suppression order; reforming affidavit after Franks hearing shows no nexus to def’s house

The affidavit for the search warrant, reformed after a Franks hearing, did not establish probable cause to search defendant’s home. The affidavit did not set forth facts showing defendant had a history of drug dealing to permit an inference that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on CA1 affirms suppression order; reforming affidavit after Franks hearing shows no nexus to def’s house

D.Idaho: Failure to tell USMJ that a trash pull came up empty wasn’t material when there was more that did show PC; wouldn’t have changed outcome

Omission to tell the USMJ that a trash search of defendant’s house came up empty didn’t undermine the other probable cause, wouldn’t have changed the outcome, and wasn’t a Franks issue. The same here about defendant’s alleged travels: Omissions don’t … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Failure to tell USMJ that a trash pull came up empty wasn’t material when there was more that did show PC; wouldn’t have changed outcome

S.D.Fla.: Claim USCG couldn’t stop def waived by guilty plea

Defendant’s claim that the U.S. Coast Guard had no jurisdiction to stop him was waived by his guilty plea. Munoz v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190095 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 31, 2019).* Defendant doesn’t get a Franks hearing because … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Claim USCG couldn’t stop def waived by guilty plea

N.D.Ill.: Franks challenge requires there was a SW

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not seeking a Franks hearing where there was no search warrant in the first place. Freeman v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187171 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2019). Defendant’s general consent to search a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Scope of search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Franks challenge requires there was a SW

AZ: Protective sweep that produced a bullet casing was unjustified (but harmless)

Defendant has standing to challenge the search of a mobile home he had rented even though he had not fully moved in, and the trial court erred in concluding otherwise. The state’s argument the entry into the mobile home required … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on AZ: Protective sweep that produced a bullet casing was unjustified (but harmless)

E.D.Ky.: Paraphrasing def’s jail calls on hearsay without affiant actually listening to them isn’t a Franks violation

A full forensic search of defendant’s cell phone was authorized by the affidavit which was attached to the search warrant. There were admissions from the defendant on jail calls to others that were reported to the police. The paraphrasing the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Paraphrasing def’s jail calls on hearsay without affiant actually listening to them isn’t a Franks violation

MO: Def’s blood draw while he was unconscious was proper under Mitchell

Defendant was unconscious after a single car accident and he smelled of alcohol. There was probable cause and the blood draw did not violate the Fourth Amendment under Mitchell v. Wisconsin. State v. Gray, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 1671 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on MO: Def’s blood draw while he was unconscious was proper under Mitchell