Category Archives: Computer and cloud searches

Reason: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I

Reason, The Volokh Conspiracy: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I by Orin S. Kerr (“The first of two rulings, and why I find it unpersuasive.”):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Reason: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I

W.D.Ky.: Delayed search of a computer was not unreasonable under either 4A or Rule 41(e)(2)(B)

The delayed search of defendant’s computer was not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment or Rule 41(e)(2)(B) because it wasn’t practical to do so at the scene. United States v. White, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117526 (W.D. Ky. July 3, 2024).* … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Delayed search of a computer was not unreasonable under either 4A or Rule 41(e)(2)(B)

CA9: 4A claim of manufactured PC is a new form of Bivens claim and is barred

Plaintiff’s complaint against DHS that agents fabricated probable cause to have him prosecuted is a new form of claim Bivens will not recognize. Sheikh v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16441 (9th Cir. July 5, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: 4A claim of manufactured PC is a new form of Bivens claim and is barred

CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls

There is no constitutional distinction between pretrial detainees and convicts in a jail for the reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone calls on a jail line phone they knew was recorded. State v. Bember, 2024 Conn. LEXIS 153 (June 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls

E.D.N.Y.: iCloud SW was particular to time and offenses

“The Court finds both the iCloud and Midwood Lumber Warrants were sufficiently particularized and tethered to the Affidavits’ probable cause showings, thereby meeting the Fourth Amendment’s requirements.” … “[I]he iCloud Warrant identifies the property to be searched as “information associated … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Forfeiture, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: iCloud SW was particular to time and offenses

W.D.Ark.: 4A § 1983 case stayed under Younger for ptf to litigate in state court

“Here, Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages for his improper search, seizure, and entrapment claims. Plaintiff has not alleged he is prevented from bringing his ‘entrapment,” search and seizure claims in state court. Accordingly, it is appropriate, pursuant to the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abstention, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: 4A § 1983 case stayed under Younger for ptf to litigate in state court

CA8: SW including “electronic files” meant computer could be searched

A search warrant that included “electronic files” meant that a computer could be searched. United States v. Lukassen, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13392 (8th Cir. June 4, 2024). Defendant didn’t show standing in the car he was driving, and it … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: SW including “electronic files” meant computer could be searched

WaPo: Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data

WaPo: +Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data by Gerrit De Vynck (“The tech giant gives reams of data to police. It has laid off part of the team that ensures those requests are legal. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, General warrant, Particularity | Comments Off on WaPo: Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data

D.Nev.: A website’s cookies linked def’s personal email address for nexus

In a criminal copyright case, cookies on website led to defendant’s business and personal email accounts, and that gave nexus to them for the warrant. “Under the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that the search warrant reveals a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: A website’s cookies linked def’s personal email address for nexus

E.D.Mo.: PV warrant permitted entry to place where def reasonably suspected to reside

PV warrant permitted entry into suspected residence of violator. “However, the Eighth Circuit has made clear that, provided an administrative warrant is supported by reasonable cause, it carries the same implied limited authority to enter a dwelling to effectuate an … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: PV warrant permitted entry to place where def reasonably suspected to reside

CA9: Asking detainee about parole status is reasonable

Asking a detainee about his parole status reasonably relates to officer safety and imposes a negligible burden on the detainee. United States v. Ramirez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 9388 (9th Cir. Apr. 18, 2024). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Asking detainee about parole status is reasonable

NPR: Google to delete search data of millions who used ‘incognito’ mode

NPR: Google to delete search data of millions who used ‘incognito’ mode by Bobby Allyn (“Google will destroy the private browsing history of millions of people who used ‘incognito’ mode in its Chrome browser as a part of a settlement … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on NPR: Google to delete search data of millions who used ‘incognito’ mode

GFR: Feds Demand Identity Of YouTube Users Who Watched Certain Videos

Giant Freakin Robot: Feds Demand Identity Of YouTube Users Who Watched Certain Videos by April Ryder (“Federal authorities in the U.S. have ordered that Google hand over tens of thousands of names, addresses, phone numbers, and user activity information for … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on GFR: Feds Demand Identity Of YouTube Users Who Watched Certain Videos

Keyboard search warrants and the Fourth Amendment

Commentary, Keyboard search warrants and the Fourth Amendment by John Villasenor, The Brookings Institute (Feb. 22, 2024):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Keyboard search warrants and the Fourth Amendment

OH8: Graham v. Connor reasonableness standard applied where police are charged with assault on civilians

Defendant was a Cleveland PD officer convicted of misdemeanor assault on a civilian by putting his hands around the throat of an arrestee. Even under the Garner standard for Fourth Amendment reasonableness, the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH8: Graham v. Connor reasonableness standard applied where police are charged with assault on civilians

E.D.N.C.: This iCloud SW not overbroad

The warrant for defendant’s iCloud account was not overbroad. Defendant essentially admitted that the information sought would be found there. United States v. Duncan, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11090 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2024).* Defendant was in a rental vehicle, but … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Computer and cloud searches, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: This iCloud SW not overbroad

Cal.5: Defective notice of Facebook warrant under CalECPA doesn’t require suppression

Defendant’s Facebook account was accessed by a search warrant issued under CalECPA. The notice provision was not complied with by the state, but the court declines to suppress here. The standard for suppression in CalECPA is the same as for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Social media warrants, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.5: Defective notice of Facebook warrant under CalECPA doesn’t require suppression

OH7: Ohio SW can be for info on California server; SCA contemplates it and CA law says providers must comply with out-of-state process

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging a social media account search warrant issued in Ohio on a California server. The SCA contemplates this, and California law directs computer companies to honor process from other states. Defendant can’t win on … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Social media warrants | Comments Off on OH7: Ohio SW can be for info on California server; SCA contemplates it and CA law says providers must comply with out-of-state process

N-M: 94-day delay in getting cell phone SW was unreasonable; GFE not applicable

The search of defendant’s iPhones and iPads lacked probable cause at the time it happened. His wife had apparent authority to search because she knew the passcodes but that doesn’t equate to her apparent authority to seize them. Also, the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Military searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N-M: 94-day delay in getting cell phone SW was unreasonable; GFE not applicable

N.D.Cal.: Passwords are protected by the Stored Communications Act

In civil case for evidence production brought in San Francisco to aid litigation in Ontario, Canada. the court holds that account passwords are protected by the Stored Communications Act and there was no consent to disclosure. In re Path Network, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Probable cause, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Passwords are protected by the Stored Communications Act