FL4: Parkland school shooting videos obtained by SW subject to state FOIA

After the Parkland FL school shooting, police got a search warrant for all the school video. The news media then made a public records request for it all, which the court found reasonable. “The evidence presented by the Media establishes that different sources tell different stories about the first responders’ conduct. The footage itself would reveal if the first responders rushed into Building 12 to confront the active shooter, formed a perimeter, or hid in stairwells and behind their vehicles for an unreasonable length of time. [¶] The Media established good cause because the footage reveals the conduct of public servants ‘discharging their assigned duties and responsibilities.’ Cannella, 438 So. 2d at 521. In addition, the footage provides insight into how Douglas’s security ‘net,’ including the use of 70 unmonitored and possibly time-delayed cameras, failed to protect the students and staff on February 14.” State Attorney’s Office of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit v. CNN, Inc., 2018 Fla. App. LEXIS 10393 (Fla. 4th DCA July 25, 2018).

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FL4: Parkland school shooting videos obtained by SW subject to state FOIA

Forward: Justice Brandeis Was Right About Technology — 90 Years Before The Courts

Forward: Justice Brandeis Was Right About Technology — 90 Years Before The Courts by Joshua Z. Rokach:
Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Forward: Justice Brandeis Was Right About Technology — 90 Years Before The Courts

ND: No PC for shipped package, but there was for def’s house

Police lacked probable cause for the search warrant for a package defendant was shipping just because they suspected it contained cash for drugs. There were suspicions because of volunteered explanations when he was shipping it, but no probable cause and the package is suppressed. A trash pull at defendant’s property helped establish probable cause, and the package warrant was distinct from it, so the fruit of the poisonous tree argument does not apply. Also, the state constitution does not provide greater protection. State v. Biwer, 2018 ND 185, 2018 N.D. LEXIS 193 (July 26, 2018).*

Defendant didn’t move to suppress CSLI, and it was not plain error. “We have trouble seeing how a circuit split on such a high-profile issue can provide good cause for failing to raise the issue in the district court.” United States v. Thomas, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20824 (7th Cir. July 26, 2018).

Posted in Cell site location information, Mail and packages | Comments Off on ND: No PC for shipped package, but there was for def’s house

NE: State dropping count CI was witness in keeps identity under wraps; can’t show materiality to other counts

The CI was used to get the search warrant for drugs in defendant’s house. During the search, the CI said there would be a gun, and officers found it. Later, the state chose not to pursue the drug charge but did the gun charge. Defendant’s motion to reveal the CI was properly denied because the CI could add nothing to the case against defendant for the gun. State v. Blair, 300 Neb. 372, 2018 Neb. LEXIS 134 (June 29, 2018).

Defendant’s plea and appeal waiver cut off his ability to appeal the guilty plea and suppression issues. People v. Nieves, 2018 NY Slip Op 05535, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5457 (3d Dept. July 26, 2018).*

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NE: State dropping count CI was witness in keeps identity under wraps; can’t show materiality to other counts

CA9: Virtual knowing Franks violation leads to suppression of immigration search before BIA

Petitioner established that the warrant for employment records sought by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office was based on knowingly material omissions and thus qualified as an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment for an immigration proceeding. Frimmel Mgmt. v. United States, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20806 (9th Cir. July 26, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: Virtual knowing Franks violation leads to suppression of immigration search before BIA

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Mississippi cops went to the wrong house and killed an innocent man. A grand jury just refused to indict them.

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Mississippi cops went to the wrong house and killed an innocent man. A grand jury just refused to indict them. by Radley Balko:

After just over a year, we finally have some news about the death of Ismael Lopez. Last year, police in Southaven, Mississippi, mistakenly went to Lopez’s home in search of a man wanted on a domestic violence warrant. They had gone to the wrong house.What happened next is in dispute, but it ended with one officer going into the house and killing Lopez. (The man whose name was on the warrant was later arrested without incident.)

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Mississippi cops went to the wrong house and killed an innocent man. A grand jury just refused to indict them.

CA8: SW for search of def’s person wasn’t particular, but there was a reference to the affidavit; GFE applies

The search warrant to search defendant’s person for things wasn’t particular, but the good faith exception applies. It referred to the affidavit which wasn’t present, but they remembered it. The search warrant wasn’t so deficient that it could not be relied on. United States v. Szczerba, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20780 (8th Cir. July 26, 2018)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on CA8: SW for search of def’s person wasn’t particular, but there was a reference to the affidavit; GFE applies

CA4: Def in rental car preserved standing issue; remanded for application of Byrd

Defendant was in a rental car, and he moved to suppress. He was denied standing under existing case law, but that was abrogated in Byrd. SCOTUS GVR’ed. Remanded for application of Byrd and whatever else. United States v. Houston, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20832 (4th Cir. July 26, 2018)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA4: Def in rental car preserved standing issue; remanded for application of Byrd

CO: Person arrested at MJ grow but not charged can get his seized property back

An uncharged person originally arrested at an alleged illegal marijuana grow has standing to recover his own property seized from him. Boudette v. State, 2018 COA 109, 2018 Colo. App. LEXIS 1036 (July 26, 2018).

Defendant’s bicycle rack on the back of his vehicle blocked the license plate and that was a reasonable basis for the stop. People v. Varnauskas, 2018 IL App (3d) 150654, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 525 (July 26, 2018).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CO: Person arrested at MJ grow but not charged can get his seized property back

N.D.Iowa: Reasonable mistaken identity justified stop

Defendant’s stop was based on reasonable suspicion he was in the country illegally, but it was a case of mistaken identity. “Defendant was observed emerging from the vicinity of the target’s residence. Defendant closely resembled the target. Any discrepancy between the target’s physical characteristics and defendant’s may be excused by the inherent imprecision of human perception in gauging an individual’s height and weight without the aid of a fiducial element.” Still, the motion to suppress is denied because the officer acted reasonably. United States v. Lopez-Tubac, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125194 (N.D. Iowa July 26, 2018).

Defendant’s motion for return of property is denied for a failure to make a proper offer of proof that the government had anything taken from him. United States v. Mayes, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125319 (E.D. Tenn. July 26, 2018).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Reasonable mistaken identity justified stop

VI: Officer’s use of “legal buzz words” with “rote and mechanical” testimony and then memory failures leads trial court to conclude he’s not credible

The officer’s use of “legal buzz words” with “rote and mechanical” testimony and then memory failures leads trial court to conclude he’s not credible. People v. Stevens, 2018 V.I. LEXIS 70 (Super. Ct. July 26, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on VI: Officer’s use of “legal buzz words” with “rote and mechanical” testimony and then memory failures leads trial court to conclude he’s not credible

CA11: “The record shows” without showing it is not a Franks “substantial preliminary showing”

Defendant failed to make an offer of proof as required by Franks. Merely saying “the record shows” or something like that without more is not a “substantial preliminary showing.” United States v. Ward, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20674 (11th Cir. July 25, 2018).*

The traffic stop was justified because the car apparently wasn’t properly registered. After the stop, reasonable suspicion developed the “large, black, square-shaped trash bags” in the back seat weren’t trash [it was 112 pounds of marijuana] came from windows down on a hot day, numerous air fresheners, nervousness, the trash didn’t smell like trash. It was enough to call for a drug dog. United States v. Martin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124236 (E.D. Pa. July 25, 2018).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: “The record shows” without showing it is not a Franks “substantial preliminary showing”

ME: Def was about to go into surgery after suspected DWI and accident; warrantless blood draw was with exigency and PC

Defendant was in a serious accident, and he was about to go into surgery. The blood draw at the request of the police was with exigent circumstances and probable cause. State v. Palmer, 2018 ME 108, 2018 Me. LEXIS 111 (July 26, 2018).

The trial court granted a motion to suppress one party consent recordings, but held no hearing. Without a hearing, there is no evidence to support the findings. State v. Garcia, 2018 Fla. App. LEXIS 10302 (Fla. 3d DCA July 25, 2018).*

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on ME: Def was about to go into surgery after suspected DWI and accident; warrantless blood draw was with exigency and PC

OR: Late night stop of apparently intoxicated driver permits officer to ask about weapons

During a stop for suspected DUI late at night, the officer can legitimately ask the defendant whether he is armed. State v. Miller, 363 Ore. 374, 2018 Ore. LEXIS 602 (July 26, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Late night stop of apparently intoxicated driver permits officer to ask about weapons

CA2: Def wore GPS for two years for parole, but parole officers turned over monitoring to feds; monitoring not unreasonable

Defendant was on state parole and wore a GPS ankle monitor for two years. Parole turned over monitoring to the feds who monitored him to see what he was doing. The district court suppressed (United States v. Lambus, 251 F. Supp. 3d 470 (E.D.N.Y. May 4, 2017), prior opinion United States v. Lambus, 221 F. Supp. 3d 319 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2016)) but the Second Circuit reversed. As a parolee, defendant had a reduced expectation of privacy. United States v. Lambus, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20647 (2d Cir. July 25, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: Def wore GPS for two years for parole, but parole officers turned over monitoring to feds; monitoring not unreasonable

CA3: What is a “Rodriquz moment” in dicta, not even decided

A long and interesting, albeit ultimately unnecessary, discussion of Rodriquez and what is a “Rodriguez moment.” There was reasonable suspicion on the totality for a longer detention. United States v. Green, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20655 (3d Cir. July 25, 2018)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: What is a “Rodriquz moment” in dicta, not even decided

The Atlantic: The FISA Fiasco’s Silver Lining

The Atlantic: The FISA Fiasco’s Silver Lining by April Doss:

Recently released documents should put to rest fear that the process of surveilling Americans could be as simple as filling out a form for a perfunctory review.

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on The Atlantic: The FISA Fiasco’s Silver Lining

N.D.N.Y.: Public employer’s prior failure to search work computers under policy didn’t create a REP

Plaintiff did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in her work issued computers under the school computer privacy policy. The fact they’d never looked before doesn’t otherwise create a reasonable expectation of privacy. Rissetto v. Clinton Essex Warren Wash. Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124214 (N.D. N.Y. July 25, 2018).*

Defendant didn’t make a preliminary showing of a Franks violation in his attempt to suppress a Title III wiretap warrant. United States v. Eiland, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123423 (D.D.C. July 24, 2018).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Public employer’s prior failure to search work computers under policy didn’t create a REP

MD: Stop-and-frisk might have been invalid, but def fled and that made it valid

Defendant was arguably subjected to an invalid stop and frisk, but his flight was an intervening circumstance supporting finding the gun. Thornton v. State, 2018 Md. App. LEXIS 716 (July 25, 2018).

“The testimony at the suppression hearing demonstrated that a radio call, along with observations made by the officer at the scene and statements the officer heard from individuals at the scene, established that the officer had a founded suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, which, by virtue of the defendant’s flight, ripened into reasonable suspicion to pursue him and detain him …. During the lawful stop of the defendant, a gun was recovered inside a hat that was in the defendant’s hand, giving the officers probable cause to arrest him ….” People v. Jackson, 2018 NY Slip Op 05491, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5372 (2d Dept. July 26, 2018).*

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on MD: Stop-and-frisk might have been invalid, but def fled and that made it valid

NY2: Murder conviction reversed: state failed to show PC to take def’s DNA

Probable cause was not shown to take defendant’s DNA. “Here, as the People correctly concede, the affidavit of the detective submitted in support of the search warrant application was conclusory and insufficient to establish probable cause to issue the warrant …. The detective stated that he believed evidence related to the victim’s murder may be found in the defendant’s saliva based on his interview of witnesses, information supplied to him by fellow police officers, and his review of police department records. However, the detective did not identify the witnesses or indicate what information he obtained from them, and did not specify what police department records he reviewed, or what information was contained in the records ….” The state argued harmless error, but it’s not. People v. Augustus, 2018 NY Slip Op 05480, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5354 (2d Dept. July 25, 2018).*

Posted in DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY2: Murder conviction reversed: state failed to show PC to take def’s DNA