Monthly Archives: September 2020

CA2: Omissions from affidavit were material and denied QI

District court’s denial of qualified immunity affirmed. Omissions from the affidavit for the search warrant were material to the finding of probable cause. Pourkavoos v. Town of Avon, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28183 (2d Cir. Sept. 3, 2020):

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Omissions from affidavit were material and denied QI

N.D.Cal.: Court doesn’t credit that a person could just walk away from a police encounter; people get shot for that

Defendant was seized by a police car parked face-to-face with his car and spotlights shining in. Defendant couldn’t be expected to drive on the sidewalk to just leave. “The Court concludes that when the uniformed police officer here parked a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Court doesn’t credit that a person could just walk away from a police encounter; people get shot for that

FL1: Foregone conclusion exception applies to compelling def’s cell phone password

The foregone conclusion exception applies to compelling defendant’s cell phone password, thus distinguishing Pollard v. State, 287 So. 3d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). Varn v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 12478 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 3, 2020):

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on FL1: Foregone conclusion exception applies to compelling def’s cell phone password

CA10: Where wrong standard of review applied below, undisputed facts allow appellate court to still decide

“Because the evidence presented by the government at the evidentiary hearing in this case was largely undisputed, we conclude that the district court’s factual findings were not clearly erroneous, and that its misapplication of the standard of review does not … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA10: Where wrong standard of review applied below, undisputed facts allow appellate court to still decide

D.D.C.: Strip search class rejected for no limit to lack of RS

Plaintiff’s proposed arrestee strip search class definition is denied for not limiting it to those strip searched without reasonable suspicion. Lewis v. District of Columbia, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160706 (D. D.C. Sept. 3, 2020):

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Strip search class rejected for no limit to lack of RS

CA11: No QI for killing decedent for trying to grab Taser to stop Tasering

“This fatal shooting ‘lies so obviously at the very core of what the Fourth Amendment prohibits that the unlawfulness of the conduct was readily apparent’ even without a prior case on point.” No qualified immunity. Cantu v. City of Dothan, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: No QI for killing decedent for trying to grab Taser to stop Tasering

CA5: Bivens not extended to excessive force claim on entering VA hospital

Bivens won’t be extended to an alleged unprovoked attack at a VA hospital metal detector. Oliva v. Nivar, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28052 (5th Cir. Sept. 2, 2020). “The issue before the Court is whether the Government violated Rule 16 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Bivens not extended to excessive force claim on entering VA hospital

CA5: RS required for border search of digital devices

Based on some other circuits, digital forensic searches require at least reasonable suspicion and no warrant. Defendant’s digital search complied with the rules of other circuits, so it was at least in good faith. United States v. Aguilar, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: RS required for border search of digital devices

CA9: Bulk data collection under FISA violates 4A and defs were entitled to notice of it; no exclusion, however

Bulk data collection under FISA violated the Fourth Amendment. A criminal defendant is entitled to notice of FISA collection. However, exclusion not applied in this case because defendants weren’t prejudiced. United States v. Moalin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28119 (9th … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on CA9: Bulk data collection under FISA violates 4A and defs were entitled to notice of it; no exclusion, however

New LR article: Local Police Surveillance and the Administrative Fourth Amendment

Mailyn Fidler, Local Police Surveillance and the Administrative Fourth Amendment, 36 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 481 (2020).

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on New LR article: Local Police Surveillance and the Administrative Fourth Amendment

W.D.Mo.: Mask ordinance doesn’t violate 4A right of privacy

The City of Springfield mask ordinance does not violate, inter alia, the Fourth Amendment right to privacy. Shelton v. City of Springfield, 6:20-cv-03258 (W.D. Mo. Sept. 2, 2020). “In specifically detailing the criminal conduct under investigation, the search warrants provide … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Mask ordinance doesn’t violate 4A right of privacy

D.Alaska: SW for cell phone was broad; it had to be, but not unreasonably so

The search of defendant’s cell phone did not unreasonably exceed the search warrant for it which was necessarily broad. “As a threshold matter, the search did not exceed the scope of the warrant. Without contesting the validity of the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Alaska: SW for cell phone was broad; it had to be, but not unreasonably so

TN: A security guard’s state license is not “state action” for 4A

A state licensed private security guard was not a state actor under the Fourth Amendment when he searched defendant’s cell phone trying to determine the owner. State v. Simpson, 2020 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 594 (Sept. 1, 2020). “Additionally, we … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Private search | Comments Off on TN: A security guard’s state license is not “state action” for 4A

CA11: Telling ptf to move along wasn’t a 4A seizure

“Here, Watkins did not state a plausible claim that Willson violated his Fourth Amendment rights because Willson did not arrest him, detain him, or restrain his movement. Instead, Willson gave Watkins notice to leave the premises, as required by Florida … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Telling ptf to move along wasn’t a 4A seizure

Reason: After the DEA Robbed Her of $43,000 at an Airport, She Joined a Class Action Challenging the Agency’s Cash Grabs

Reason: After the DEA Robbed Her of $43,000 at an Airport, She Joined a Class Action Challenging the Agency’s Cash Grabs by Jacob Sullum (“The lawsuit argues that the DEA is violating the Fourth Amendment by seizing money from travelers … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: After the DEA Robbed Her of $43,000 at an Airport, She Joined a Class Action Challenging the Agency’s Cash Grabs

CA11: Plain view supported SW; protective sweep essentially moot

Defendant’s arrest in a motel room resulted in a plain view of a distinctive sneaker that was probably worn in a robbery. That supported a search warrant. Defendant’s protective sweep argument wasn’t timely raised, but it would lose anyway because … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA11: Plain view supported SW; protective sweep essentially moot

MT: Renter of person on probation isn’t subject to landlord’s probation search

Defendant rented an outbuilding as a residence from a person on probation. His separate room was not subject to the landlord’s probation search waiver. In addition, one doesn’t have to lock his residence to have a reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MT: Renter of person on probation isn’t subject to landlord’s probation search

NY: Stop because license plate reader erroneously said car should have still been in impound lot was unreasonable

The stop here was based a license plate search. The Buffalo impound lot had not updated its records that defendant got his car out of impound more than a week earlier. There was no traffic violation. The stop was unreasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NY: Stop because license plate reader erroneously said car should have still been in impound lot was unreasonable

S.D.Fla.: Deputy sheriff stated false imprisonment claim against ATF officers

Plaintiff, a Monroe County deputy sheriff, stated a claim so far for false imprisonment against ATF agents who stopped him for no reason while he was working Hurricane Irma in the Florida Keys. His excessive force claim, however, is dismissed. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Deputy sheriff stated false imprisonment claim against ATF officers

S.D.N.Y.: Preliminary search of electronic device to look for likely places to search was reasonable

A preliminary search of an electronic device under a warrant was permissible to determine what folders on it might be responsive to the search warrant without it being overbroad. United States v. Weigand, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158771 (S.D. N.Y. … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Preliminary search of electronic device to look for likely places to search was reasonable