Monthly Archives: November 2019

D.N.J.: US can’t be sued under Bivens

Plaintiff can’t bring a Fourth Amendment Bivens claim against the United States because of sovereign immunity. There is always FTCA, but it has prerequisites. Leave to amend granted. Whitaker v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188071 (D. N.J. Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.N.J.: US can’t be sued under Bivens

NY2: Def has right of access to SW affidavit to attempt to controvert it

Defendant filed his motion to suppress in the blind because didn’t have access to the affidavit for the search warrant. It was denied without a hearing. Remanded: He gets to see it to try to controvert it. People v. Lambey, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NY2: Def has right of access to SW affidavit to attempt to controvert it

CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

Arguable probable cause supported plaintiff’s misdemeanor arrest, but there is a factual dispute denying qualified immunity to the officers of where exactly the arrest started and how it ended up indoors. That remains for trial. The complaint also survives on … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

CA3: State law required RS for a parole search

Defendant was a parolee, and the parties argued over whether no suspicion was required for a parole search or reasonable suspicion. The government argued no suspicion required. The parole conditions didn’t specify, but state statute did, and reasonable suspicion is … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA3: State law required RS for a parole search

WA: A purse and a closed pouch within are subject to search incident

Defendant was subject to a valid search incident, and that included not only her purse, but also a pouch within her purse. State v. Richards, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 2772 (Oct. 29, 2019). Officers saw defendant and others and ordered … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: A purse and a closed pouch within are subject to search incident

N.D.Ill.: Franks challenge requires there was a SW

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not seeking a Franks hearing where there was no search warrant in the first place. Freeman v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187171 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2019). Defendant’s general consent to search a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Scope of search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Franks challenge requires there was a SW

CA11: RS supported a protective sweep for def after a police foot chase and officers having reason to believe he could have doubled back to the hotel room from where he started

Defendant discovered he was under surveillance at his motel and he fled. Officers came back to his room in 10 minutes, and seeing his car entered his room thinking he had doubled back. He did not abandon his privacy interest … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA11: RS supported a protective sweep for def after a police foot chase and officers having reason to believe he could have doubled back to the hotel room from where he started

GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

The reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel room expires with the checkout time. Lindsey v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Oct. 29, 2019). The defendant officers were properly entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s excessive force claim. Also, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

The Atlantic: Did Body Cameras Backfire?

The Atlantic: Did Body Cameras Backfire? by Sidney Fussell (“Body cameras were supposed to fix a broken system. What happened?”)

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Did Body Cameras Backfire?

WaPo: ACLU sues FBI, DOJ over facial-recognition technology, criticizing ‘unprecedented’ surveillance and secrecy

WaPo: ACLU sues FBI, DOJ over facial-recognition technology, criticizing ‘unprecedented’ surveillance and secrecy by Drew Harwell (“The American Civil Liberties Union on Thursday sued the Justice Department, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI for records detailing their use of … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: ACLU sues FBI, DOJ over facial-recognition technology, criticizing ‘unprecedented’ surveillance and secrecy