Monthly Archives: March 2018

OH10: Def walking down street with a bullet magazine on belt wasn’t violating law and he could ignore officers

Defendant was walking down the street, and officers noticed he had a bullet magazine on his belt. They followed him to his residence, and he declined to talk to them and went inside. Their entry into his residence violated the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Def walking down street with a bullet magazine on belt wasn’t violating law and he could ignore officers

WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge

WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge by Christopher Mimms: You are giving away more data about your location than you probably realize through the apps in your smartphone-and that data is being sold, often without your … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge

S.D.Ala.: AL state requirement of recording SW application doesn’t apply to SW used in federal court

The Alabama state requirement that an application for a search warrant be recorded doesn’t apply to using the product of the search in federal court. United States v. Tensley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29979 (S.D. Ala. Feb. 26, 2018). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: AL state requirement of recording SW application doesn’t apply to SW used in federal court

CA11: Protective sweep was justified by an extra car out front and voices from inside

A protective sweep was justified by an extra car out front and voices from inside. United States v. Ratcliff, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 5443 (11th Cir. Feb. 28, 2018). Officer “knocked” on defendant’s tent at a campsite to talk to … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA11: Protective sweep was justified by an extra car out front and voices from inside

CA6: No knock entry at 4 am stated claim for unreasonable execution of SW

Plaintiffs adequately allege a claim for unreasonable execution of a search warrant. The officers executed a search warrant at 4 am without knocking or announcing, and shot the lock off the door. Greer v. City of Highland Park, 2018 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: No knock entry at 4 am stated claim for unreasonable execution of SW

CA6: Nexus to cell phones shown through investigation plus def was using his when arrested

Nexus was shown to defendant’s cell phone because the affidavit in support of the search warrant for the phone showed that the gang had used cell phones to communicate and defendant was using his phone when arrested and he’d already … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Nexus to cell phones shown through investigation plus def was using his when arrested

ACLU: TSA Tests See-Through Scanners on Public in New York’s Penn Station

ACLU: TSA Tests See-Through Scanners on Public in New York’s Penn Station by Rashida Richardson, New York Civil Liberties Union & Jay Stanley, Senior Policy Analyst, ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ACLU: TSA Tests See-Through Scanners on Public in New York’s Penn Station

NY3: In camera CI reliability hearing established it

“Based on our in camera review of the transcript of the Darden hearing, we are satisfied that County Court properly determined that the CIs existed and provided reliable and timely information that justified a finding that probable cause existed to … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY3: In camera CI reliability hearing established it

CA5: Def’s cell phone apps scan at border was supported by PC

“After discovering kilos of meth in the suitcase Maria Isabel Molina-Isidoro was carrying across the border, customs agents looked at a couple of apps on her cell phone. Molina argues that the evidence found during this warrantless search of her … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s cell phone apps scan at border was supported by PC

W.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was unjustified and suppressed

The protective sweep here was unreasonable because the officers had no articulable facts at all that there was potentially anyone inside before entering. United States v. Rucker, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33607 (W.D. N.Y. Mar. 1, 2018). “Mr. Huffman had … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was unjustified and suppressed

LA1: Look in mailbox to confirm def’s address was after they’d confirmed his apartment; not unreasonable

In the course of a homicide investigation, the victim was shown to have last talked to defendant on his cell phone just before his murder. That led to getting his picture to show to a witness who ID’d him as … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on LA1: Look in mailbox to confirm def’s address was after they’d confirmed his apartment; not unreasonable

LA2: Hearsay admissible in suppression hearings; here it was officer’s preliminary hearing testimony which showed exigency

Hearsay is admissible in a suppression hearing. The parties agreed here that the officer’s testimony at the preliminary hearing would be the basis for the suppression hearing, and it shows exigent circumstances for the entry into defendant’s home. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on LA2: Hearsay admissible in suppression hearings; here it was officer’s preliminary hearing testimony which showed exigency

CA8: The challenge to RS isn’t piece by piece; RS on totality

The police surveilled defendant’s garage where he was alleged to sell meth from his home in the early morning or at night when he was home. The totality of circumstances add up to reasonable suspicion, and defendant’s challenge was to … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: The challenge to RS isn’t piece by piece; RS on totality

CA10: The GFE question is “whether the affidavit is so facially deficient that reliance on a warrant issued in response to that affidavit cannot have been in good faith”

The question is not just probable cause; it’s whether it was reasonable for the officer to rely on a warrant that is not facially deficient. United States v. Knox, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 4791 (10th Cir. Feb. 27, 2018):

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA10: The GFE question is “whether the affidavit is so facially deficient that reliance on a warrant issued in response to that affidavit cannot have been in good faith”

E.D.Mo.: No joint venture shown with Philippines LEOs in seizure of def’s suitcase there

The search in the Philippines was not a joint venture with the United States, so the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to it. “There is no evidence that the FBI was aware that items from Defendant’s home were in the suitcase. … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No joint venture shown with Philippines LEOs in seizure of def’s suitcase there