Monthly Archives: January 2018

D.Me.: Getting def to reveal cell phone passcode was 5A claim, not a 4A claim

Defendant’s cell phone was seized with a warrant. Defendant was questioned and he lawyered up, but the officer ignored it and kept asking questions. Finally, defendant gave up the passcode for the phone. This is a Fifth Amendment issue, not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Getting def to reveal cell phone passcode was 5A claim, not a 4A claim

Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia & Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States

Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia by Orin Kerr Volokh Conspiracy: Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States by Orin Kerr

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia & Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States

Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches by Damon Root:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception”

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception” by Amy Howe:

Posted in Automobile exception, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception”

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement?

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement? by Amy Howe:

Posted in SCOTUS, Standing | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement?

National Review: Opinion: We Were Wrong about Stop-and-Frisk

National Review: Opinion: We Were Wrong about Stop-and-Frisk by Kyle Smith:

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on National Review: Opinion: We Were Wrong about Stop-and-Frisk

The Hill: Opinion: Bulk surveillance is the wrong way to approach security

The Hill: Opinion: Bulk surveillance is the wrong way to approach security by Neema Singh Guliani & Jason Pye:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on The Hill: Opinion: Bulk surveillance is the wrong way to approach security

D.Md.: While def’s statement is suppressed for a Miranda violation, he still consented to a search of his car during the suppressed statement

While defendant’s confession was suppressed for a Miranda violation, his consent to search was still valid because his will was not overborne. United States v. Woodland, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 319 (D. Md. Jan. 2, 2018):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Md.: While def’s statement is suppressed for a Miranda violation, he still consented to a search of his car during the suppressed statement

MN: Birchfield not retroactive

Application of Birchfield in Minnesota was determined to be procedural rather than substantive for purposes of retroactive effect. Johnson v. State, 2018 Minn. App. LEXIS 10 (Jan. 2, 2018). Defendant’s detention was with reasonable suspicion. “Considering the totality of the … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MN: Birchfield not retroactive

CA5: Forgoing license check not unreasonable under Rodriguez where investigation is proceeding apace

“Burcham’s argument based on Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 1609 (2015), is unavailing. Rodriguez is distinguishable; the district court did not err in finding that Jenkins’s decision to extend the stop was justified by additional reasonable suspicion developed from … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA5: Forgoing license check not unreasonable under Rodriguez where investigation is proceeding apace

OH8: Drug dog on scene while ticket being written caused no additional detention

Defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion based on corroborated informant hearsay. “Because the police were still in the process of writing the traffic ticket when the canine arrived and conducted the sniff, and thus the stop was not unlawfully extended.” … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH8: Drug dog on scene while ticket being written caused no additional detention

MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants

MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants by Toni McAllister:

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MyNewsLA.com: Apartment building owners sue LA over rent stabilization, argue ordinance hurts tenants

D.D.C.: Suppressed evidence [a confession] leads to grant of pretrial release

The question of the effect of suppressed evidence on the question of bail is considered at length in United States v. Taylor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205 (D.D.C. Jan. 2, 2018), albeit here in a suppressed confession. The court concludes … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Suppressed evidence [a confession] leads to grant of pretrial release

CA8: Denying any knowledge of a car or its contents is abandonment of a cell phone found inside it; cell phones subject to abandonment

Defendant was believed connected to a shooting involving a Buick. He was taken back to the Buick after arrest, and he denied all knowledge of the Buick. Inside was found a cell phone that the police seized and obtained a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA8: Denying any knowledge of a car or its contents is abandonment of a cell phone found inside it; cell phones subject to abandonment

W.D.Mo.: Shrugging shoulders in response to a question was consent

The court finds defendant consented to a search of his bag on a bus by a shrug of his shoulders. United States v. Salas-Lopez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212709 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 16, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212286 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Shrugging shoulders in response to a question was consent

California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas versions of Search and Seizure

Want to write a version of Search and Seizure for your state? Have two years to spend on advancing your own knowledge of the subject? Lexis plans state specific versions of Search and Seizure for these states. Email the author … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas versions of Search and Seizure

AP: “Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine” because a drug dog said it was cocaine

AP: Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine: OVIEDO, Fla. (AP) — A Florida man spent 90 days in jail after police officers who stopped him for driving without headlights said white powder found in his … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on AP: “Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine” because a drug dog said it was cocaine

KS declines to decide whether odor of MJ on the person is PC because here there was more than just that

Defendant didn’t dim headlights and officers stopped the car suspecting inattentive driving. The smell of marijuana coming from the car was obvious. “We decline the State’s offer to embark on a new legal proposition that would allow Kansas law enforcement … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on KS declines to decide whether odor of MJ on the person is PC because here there was more than just that

OH3: Narc told patrol officer def was drug suspect, and patrol officer ran DL and found it was suspended; stop valid despite pretext claim

A patrol officer was told that defendant was a drug suspect. He was told because he had stopped defendant before and was familiar with him. He ran defendant’s name through the state computer and it showed that defendant had no … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH3: Narc told patrol officer def was drug suspect, and patrol officer ran DL and found it was suspended; stop valid despite pretext claim

OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

Defendant was initially stopped with information from a CI amounting to reasonable suspicion that he was purchasing precursors and ingredients to manufacture methamphetamine. When the police got to his house, it was apparent there was a working meth lab, and … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH5: Working meth lab is exigency