Monthly Archives: July 2017

IA declines to abandon automobile exception just because of availability of electronic warrants

Iowa declines to abandon the automobile exception just because technological advances make it possible to apply for telephone or email warrants from the scene of a search. Other states attempted that and reverted back to the automobile exception. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on IA declines to abandon automobile exception just because of availability of electronic warrants

OH2: Motion to suppress was vague and def didn’t clarify at hearing; appeal argument waived

The motion to suppress was vague, and defendant got a hearing. When the prosecutor complained about the vagueness and what the issues were, defense counsel didn’t elaborate. On appeal, the issues were more focused. The court of appeals takes this … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH2: Motion to suppress was vague and def didn’t clarify at hearing; appeal argument waived

IA: Breath test of boater was valid as search incident under 4A but not state const.

“[T]he breath test [of a boater] constituted a search incident to arrest excepted from the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement under Birchfield.” State v. Pettijohn, 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 78 (June 30, 2017):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Breath test of boater was valid as search incident under 4A but not state const.

CA11: No CoA for 2255 where no 4A IAC because search was valid

CoA denied 2255 petitioner because the search was valid on the merits, so defense counsel couldn’t be ineffective. Smith v. United States, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11902 (11th Cir. Jan. 9, 2017) (order).* State law governs state officers; federal law … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: No CoA for 2255 where no 4A IAC because search was valid

The New Yorker: The Bootlegger, the Wiretap, and the Beginning of Privacy

The New Yorker: The Bootlegger, the Wiretap, and the Beginning of Privacy by Karen Abbott

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The New Yorker: The Bootlegger, the Wiretap, and the Beginning of Privacy

CA11: Recent murder-robbery made entry into defendant’s house “sufficiently exigent”

The police knew that defendant had “recently” committed an armed robbery and murder, and that he was in his house and armed. They determined to enter and arrest him, and they did. The protective sweep and consent after that was … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit | Comments Off on CA11: Recent murder-robbery made entry into defendant’s house “sufficiently exigent”

OR: Generalized consent to open and look in a purse at a courthouse entrance is not per se consent to search a closed container inside

Court reaffirms that generalized consent to open and look in a purse at a courthouse entrance is not per se consent to search a closed container inside. State v. Winn, 361 Ore. 636, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 422 (June 29, 2017). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Generalized consent to open and look in a purse at a courthouse entrance is not per se consent to search a closed container inside

E.D.Wis.: Doesn’t matter that Google stores E-mails offshore

The fact the server on which the emails sought by the government are outside the United States doesn’t mean that the government can’t get them by valid process. The court declines to follow Matter of Warrant to Search a Certain … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Doesn’t matter that Google stores E-mails offshore

E.D.Tenn.: No IAC where nothing from unchallenged alleged illegal search was put used at trial

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress where nothing from the search was put into evidence at defendant’s trial. There is no prejudice. Jordan v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102698 (E.D. Tenn. July … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: No IAC where nothing from unchallenged alleged illegal search was put used at trial

Army CCA: Def showed IAC from defense counsel’s decision to forgo a motion to suppress; failure to show nexus was unreasoned and entitled to no Strickland deference

Defendant on post-conviction showed that trial defense counsel’s decision to forgo a motion to suppress for failure to show nexus was unreasoned and entitled to no Strickland deference. United States v. Close, 2017 CCA LEXIS 432 (Army Ct. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on Army CCA: Def showed IAC from defense counsel’s decision to forgo a motion to suppress; failure to show nexus was unreasoned and entitled to no Strickland deference

OH1: Apparent authority shown for third party consent to search of def’s bedroom

Consent was granted by someone the police reasonably believed had apparent authority to consent to a search of defendant’s bedroom [no facts given to see how there’s third party consent to a bedroom, so this is immediately suspect]. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on OH1: Apparent authority shown for third party consent to search of def’s bedroom

CAAF: Attenuation not shown and ER applies: officer conducted ‘unwise, avoidable, and unlawful’ investigation and arrest

Defendant’s arrest was unlawful and the government failed to show attenuation. “However, we do not think it necessary that the agent’s misconduct be outrageous for the third factor in Brown to apply. Though there is no evidence of bad motive … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on CAAF: Attenuation not shown and ER applies: officer conducted ‘unwise, avoidable, and unlawful’ investigation and arrest

Two rejected IAC claims, one for lack of a record yet

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim was not presented to the trial court, and the court declines to reach it on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim for lack of a record. He can do that later. Shinstock v. State, 2017 Miss. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Two rejected IAC claims, one for lack of a record yet

IN recognizes a temporal limit on delaying stops with RS

Defendant was seen in a park wearing a gang color shirt and was a suspected truant, although the officer didn’t act on it. Hours later, after school, defendant was seen again with a group wearing red except his red shirt … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN recognizes a temporal limit on delaying stops with RS

TX1: Smell of MJ in car not found didn’t support search of pockets

The smell of marijuana coming from defendant’s car, never found in a search of the car, didn’t justify a search of his person while he was handcuffed and sitting on the curb. Meane v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 5976 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX1: Smell of MJ in car not found didn’t support search of pockets

NH: Limited state auto exception recognized where plainly visible contents are contraband

NH recognizes limited state automobile exception under state constitution where a warrant is not required where “the police have probable cause to believe that a plainly visible item in the vehicle is contraband.” State v. Cora, 2017 N.H. LEXIS 132 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on NH: Limited state auto exception recognized where plainly visible contents are contraband

CA9: Def’s possession of ammo was independent basis to issue SW

Police were called to defendant’s home in a domestic call that he was holding his wife and her child against their will. They entered and handcuffed him. A patdown of his person produced ammunition. Officers looked in a stack of … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Def’s possession of ammo was independent basis to issue SW

OH5: Plain view didn’t apply to a firearm where it wasn’t readily obvious it was stolen

The plain view doctrine did not apply because the firearm was not immediately apparent as incriminating evidence or contraband, and testimony at the suppression hearing established the officers could not readily identify the firearm as stolen. State v. Elschlager, 2017-Ohio-5545, … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH5: Plain view didn’t apply to a firearm where it wasn’t readily obvious it was stolen

MA: A civil abuse order of protection cannot be served by a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment and the Massachusetts Constitution

A civil abuse order of protection cannot be served by a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment and the Massachusetts Constitution. Commonwealth v. Sanborn, 2017 Mass. LEXIS 496 (June 29, 2017):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on MA: A civil abuse order of protection cannot be served by a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment and the Massachusetts Constitution

FL declines to to apply Davis GFE where cell phone search issue was being actively litigated all over

Where everybody knew that the law wasn’t settled at the time of the search of defendant’s cell phone before Riley because the issue was being litigated everywhere and in this state, the state doesn’t get the benefit of the Davis … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on FL declines to to apply Davis GFE where cell phone search issue was being actively litigated all over