Monthly Archives: June 2017

D.P.R.: Secondary border inspection of def’s cell phone for evidence of dog fighting was reasonable

Defendant’s alleged fighting dogs and his cell phone were validly the subject of secondary border inspections in San Juan. United States v. Castro-Correa, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90966 (D.P.R. June 12, 2017).* Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the search … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Secondary border inspection of def’s cell phone for evidence of dog fighting was reasonable

DE: Video doesn’t support state’s claim of consent; smell of MJ gave PC

The dashcam video supports the fact the license plate light was out. The court rejects the state’s argument for consent because the video doesn’t even support it. Instead, the smell of marijuana and defendant’s admission he recently smoked gave probable … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Video doesn’t support state’s claim of consent; smell of MJ gave PC

NE: Evidence of a recent burglary justifies entry on exigency

“Courts generally find sufficient exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless entry into a home when a police officer reasonably believes that a burglary is in progress or was recently committed therein. A burglary indicates an immediate need to secure the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NE: Evidence of a recent burglary justifies entry on exigency

M.D.Pa.: A traffic stop can be pretextual under Whren as long as there is a real reason, too

Under Whren, the stop of a vehicle can be completely pretextual as long as a factual basis is shown. The officer said defendant was speeding, and there’s nothing in the record that suggests otherwise. United States v. Ponder, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Pretext | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: A traffic stop can be pretextual under Whren as long as there is a real reason, too

W.D.Mo.: SW for car unnecessary because there was PC

There was probable cause for search of defendant’s car, and that makes the search warrant for the car moot as legally unnecessary. United States v. Hudson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91449 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 27, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: SW for car unnecessary because there was PC

D.Haw.: Possible new evidence on search issue for motion for new trial doesn’t change outcome

Defendant’s motion for new trial based on possible new evidence for litigating the search and seizure claim under F.R.Crim.P. 33 is denied because it doesn’t change the outcome. United States v. Kapahu, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88922 (D. Haw. June … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Possible new evidence on search issue for motion for new trial doesn’t change outcome

OR: There is no state constitutional requirement the state get a telephonic warrant to avoid exigency

The state showed adequate evidence that it would take 4-5 hours to obtain a search warrant in this case, and that was enough to show exigency here. The defense put on proof that the state could have obtained a telephonic … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: There is no state constitutional requirement the state get a telephonic warrant to avoid exigency

OH8: Checking under the hood during an inventory search is reasonable

Checking under the hood during an inventory search is reasonable. State v. Lewis, 2017-Ohio-4300, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2352 (8th Dist. June 15, 2017). The totality and detail of information from the CI provided the police reasonable suspicion to stop … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Checking under the hood during an inventory search is reasonable

AK: Driver’s running from a traffic stop alone didn’t create RS to frisk or search passengers

The driver of the pickup defendant was riding in was stopped for a seatbelt violation, and the driver fled on foot. The Alaska State Trooper gave chase but couldn’t keep up. He came back to the vehicle where the two … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Driver’s running from a traffic stop alone didn’t create RS to frisk or search passengers

OR: Knowledge of the scope of consent needs to be unambiguous

Failure to object to a search is not consent unless it is unambiguously granted. On this record, it’s not clear defendant even knew that a search of a knotted grocery bag within a backpack would happen, so the case is … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Knowledge of the scope of consent needs to be unambiguous

CA5: Collective knowledge from narcs applies to justification for traffic stop

The totality of the circumstances did not dictate a finding that a turn-signal violation was too stale to justify stopping defendant’s vehicle. A lack of personalized suspicion on the part of the officer who stopped defendant’s vehicle was immaterial because … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on CA5: Collective knowledge from narcs applies to justification for traffic stop

OH11: Running away is withdrawal of consent to search, but reasonable suspicion for a patdown

Defendant was stopped and consented to a search of his person. When that started, he was moving like he was trying to hide something, then he ran away. Considering the location was a high crime area, there was at least … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: Running away is withdrawal of consent to search, but reasonable suspicion for a patdown

W.D.Mo.: Observed drug deals with CI showed reliability and lack of staleness of information

A state court judge issued a tracking warrant for defendant’s car based on a heavily corroborated CI who did drug deals with the defendant while LEOs watched. This “shows that the confidential information was reliable and that the information was … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Observed drug deals with CI showed reliability and lack of staleness of information

MA: Use of some additional force in arresting def was not “disproportionate” based on what police knew about firearms in car and risk of violence

The use of some additional force in arresting defendant was not “disproportionate” based on information defendant was armed and that his girlfriend, traveling with him, could use violence to “upset” his arrest. Commonwealth v. Widener, 2017 Mass. App. LEXIS 85 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on MA: Use of some additional force in arresting def was not “disproportionate” based on what police knew about firearms in car and risk of violence

MA: Arrest at door alone didn’t justify protective sweep

Half a dozen officers showed up at defendant’s house with an arrest warrant. He met them at the door, and he was handcuffed and arrested and said “Let’s go.” He was asked whether others were in the house, and he … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on MA: Arrest at door alone didn’t justify protective sweep

WaPo: How self-driving cars could determine the future of policing

WaPo: How self-driving cars could determine the future of policing by Orin Kerr

Posted in Automobile exception, Pretext | Comments Off on WaPo: How self-driving cars could determine the future of policing

Motherboard: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy

Motherboard: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy by Stephen Vladeck: Later this year, the Supreme Court will decide if police can track a person’s cell phone location without a warrant. It’s the most important … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Motherboard: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy

S.D.Fla.: 4A IAC claim has to be decided on merits first; if search valid, no IAC

An IAC claim for failure to file a motion to suppress usually requires the merits of the motion be decided. “Because neither of the Fourth Amendment arguments have merit, trial counsel’s failure to move to suppress this evidence did not … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: 4A IAC claim has to be decided on merits first; if search valid, no IAC

Two on waiver of motions to suppress

Where the motion to suppress was filed the Friday before a Monday bench trial, it was within the discretion of the district court to defer the suppression motion ruling until after all the evidence was in. United States v. Hardison, … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on Two on waiver of motions to suppress

NE: SW for property includes vehicles found and belonging there

Search warrant for property includes vehicles parked on the property that are connected to the property [as in the owner]. State v. Hidalgo, 296 Neb. 912, 2017 Neb. LEXIS 87 (June 9, 2017). Officers coming upon an assault in progress, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Scope of search | Comments Off on NE: SW for property includes vehicles found and belonging there