Monthly Archives: September 2014

VI: DNA request 15 months later wasn’t stale, but it was speculative and denied

There was no probable cause for obtaining a buccal swab for DNA 15 months after defendant’s arrest to attempt to link him to a gun. The best that the officers could say was that there may be trace evidence that … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on VI: DNA request 15 months later wasn’t stale, but it was speculative and denied

KS former restrictive SI statute applied rather than Gant

Kansas had a search statute [in effect from 2006-11] that was more restrictive on the police than Gant, and the trial court and court of appeals erred in not applying that statute. State v. Julian, 2014 Kan. LEXIS 500 (September … Continue reading

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on KS former restrictive SI statute applied rather than Gant

MT: Talking control of DL is a seizure when they are carried to the patrol car

The officer’s taking control of defendant’s and the passenger’s driver’s license was a seizure of them when he took the DLs back to the patrol car to run them. They were not free to leave. State v. Strom, 2014 MT … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on MT: Talking control of DL is a seizure when they are carried to the patrol car

NYTimes: Editorial: Smartwatches and Weak Privacy Rules

NYTimes: Editorial: Smartwatches and Weak Privacy Rules: It’s true that the devices could help some people lead healthier lives. The problem is that most of the medical and personal information collected by fitness trackers and apps is not protected by … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on NYTimes: Editorial: Smartwatches and Weak Privacy Rules

Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire

Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire: Texas’ warrantless blood draw statute has been challenged and in some cases declared unconstitutional by intermediate state appellate judges in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 McNeely … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire

Daily Beast: Your Arrest Video Is Going Online. Who Will See It?

Daily Beast: Your Arrest Video Is Going Online. Who Will See It? by Jacob Seigel: America is rushing to outfit cops with cameras, but even experts aren’t sure of the laws regulating the storage of the videos they capture—or determining … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Daily Beast: Your Arrest Video Is Going Online. Who Will See It?

Missing posts for book supplement added back in

Those cases that will definitely make it into the 2015 book supplement have been added back in. Those marked with an * weren’t. Yes, and still behind.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Missing posts for book supplement added back in

CA11: Officer denied qualified immunity for slamming passive arrestee to pavement

“We have repeatedly ruled that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment, and is denied qualified immunity, if he or she uses gratuitous and excessive force against a suspect who is under control, not resisting, and obeying commands. See, e.g., … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer denied qualified immunity for slamming passive arrestee to pavement

CA11: Courthouse security guard denied qualified immunity for twisting arm of a female lawyer on the phone

Plaintiff in this § 1983 case was a lawyer entering the Fulton County Courthouse. She put her briefcase and purse on the conveyor belt for the x-ray machine, but she set off the metal detector. She was instructed to take … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Courthouse security guard denied qualified immunity for twisting arm of a female lawyer on the phone

CA9: A roving game warden stop not a proper administrative search

“We must decide whether a suspicionless roving automobile stop of commercial fishers made while they drive on a public highway to investigate compliance with Washington fish and game laws constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure within the meaning of the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: A roving game warden stop not a proper administrative search

MO: “I need to talk to you” is a request not a command

Defendant was not seized by officer who, based on an anonymous tip that defendant was armed, stopped near defendant and walked toward him saying “I need to talk to you.” Defendant backpadeled and reached for his waistband. The officer drew … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MO: “I need to talk to you” is a request not a command

D.Utah: Defendant was clearly “seized” at the police station; couldn’t even go to bathroom without escort

Defendant was transported to the police station in the caged back of a patrol car and the police had his ID. He was kept incommunicado, denied food and water, and escorted to the bathroom. He was seized, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Utah: Defendant was clearly “seized” at the police station; couldn’t even go to bathroom without escort

CA2: Court lacks “high level of confidence” for inevitable discovery to apply

Here, the search discovering defendant’s illegal firearms violated the Fourth Amendment, but the government argued for inevitable discovery, but the court lacks a “high level of confidence” that the officers would have inevitably discovered it. The government’s argument was essentially … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Inevitable discovery, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA2: Court lacks “high level of confidence” for inevitable discovery to apply

PA: Cell phone not per se subject to plain view for seizure and search for its potential information

A cell phone is not per se subject to the plain view exception just because it contains information that the police might suppose conceivably has some relationship to the crime they are investigating. Commonwealth v. Wright, 2014 PA Super 189, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on PA: Cell phone not per se subject to plain view for seizure and search for its potential information

CA9: Posse Comitatus Act applies to NCIS investigation of CP cases against civilians

Posse Comitatus Act applied to NCIS investigation into child pornography anywhere in the State of Washington against civilians. Thus, the district court erred in not suppressing the evidence. United States v. Dreyer, 13-30077 (9th Cir. September 12, 2014) (summary by … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA9: Posse Comitatus Act applies to NCIS investigation of CP cases against civilians

Watchdog.org: Bloodletting could be in store for Mississippi drivers at DUI checkpoints

Watchdog.org: Bloodletting could be in store for Mississippi drivers at DUI checkpoints by Steve Wilson: Over the long Labor Day weekend, the patrol ran a no-refusal DUI checkpoint in Oxford, home of the University of Mississippi. In a no-refusal checkpoint, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Roadblocks | Comments Off on Watchdog.org: Bloodletting could be in store for Mississippi drivers at DUI checkpoints

We’ve been down for 9 days; back up Sunday

Longest ever down in 11½ years. Most likely cause: WordPress plug-ins got corrupted. Right now it’s missing a few posts from late August to September 5th. They’re backed up somewhere and will be added back in shortly. In the interim, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on We’ve been down for 9 days; back up Sunday

N.D.Ohio: Justification for stop “does not pass the laugh test” but still objectively reasonable

“Although this is a close decision, the Court denies Defendant’s motion. Sergeant Timberlake’s testimony that he stopped Davidoff’s van for a lane change [on an almost vacant interstate highway] does not pass the laugh test. He obviously stopped Davidoff’s vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Justification for stop “does not pass the laugh test” but still objectively reasonable

OH8: Entry into def’s home for DWI arrest wasn’t with sufficient justification

Police officers’ warrantless forced home entry to arrest defendant suspected of OVI violated the Fourth Amendment and the Ohio Constitution because, under the totality of the circumstances. Evidence that defendant turned into his driveway and parked the car before the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Border search | Comments Off on OH8: Entry into def’s home for DWI arrest wasn’t with sufficient justification

NJ: Emergency entry valid despite two hour delay attempting to locate victim

The entry into defendant’s home was justified under the emergency aid doctrine on a finding of blood despite a two hour delay where the police were calling hospitals trying to locate the defendant to avoid the entry unless it was … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Emergency entry valid despite two hour delay attempting to locate victim