Daily Archives: September 20, 2014

Lawfare: The Encryption Wars Continue

Lawfare: The Encryption Wars Continue by Paul Rosenzweig: For quite a while it has been the case that properly implemented encryption will defeat efforts to crack it (at least using current technology). Yet it has been the case for an … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Lawfare: The Encryption Wars Continue

KS: Despite coerced consent for blood draw, no exclusionary rule for DL suspension proceeding

The threat to get a BAC warrant here lacked a legal basis under the statute, so defendant’s consent was coerced. The exclusionary rule does not apply in administrative driver’s license suspension proceedings. The court also disagreed with another panel of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on KS: Despite coerced consent for blood draw, no exclusionary rule for DL suspension proceeding

OH6: Small amount of MJ in trash pull wasn’t PC for SW for evidence of cultivation or trafficking

Officers had three year old information that defendant was involved in marijuana cultivation, and nothing was done about it. A trash pull was done that produced a tiny amount of marijuana. The stale information had to be disregarded, and the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on OH6: Small amount of MJ in trash pull wasn’t PC for SW for evidence of cultivation or trafficking

OH2: Five officer knock-and-talk valid where defendant on porch when consent given

Five officers showed up at defendant’s house for a knock and talk and one went down the alley to check around back there. Defendant had a dog, and, when he came to the door, he was asked to come outside. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Knock and talk | Comments Off on OH2: Five officer knock-and-talk valid where defendant on porch when consent given

N.D.Okla.: Court finds officer mistaken on when consent given, and suppresses

“Fundamentally, the burden of proof for consent is on the government, United States v. Maestas, 2 F.3d 1485, 1491 (10th Cir. 1993), and, as noted above, any ambiguity in the testimony will be resolved against the government. The Court finds … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Court finds officer mistaken on when consent given, and suppresses

E.D.Mich.: Failure to promptly answer PO’s knock at door was RS for an entry, given drug history

Defendant’s failure to answer his door promptly was reasonable cause for a warrantless parole search entry because, given defendant’s drug history, it was reasonable to believe he was destroying drugs. United States v. Sandlain, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129135 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to promptly answer PO’s knock at door was RS for an entry, given drug history

KY: 2 am knock-and-talk based on tip was suppressed where tip quickly proved wrong

2 a.m. knock and talk based on midnight anonymous call about noxious odors from the property was invalid where the officers approaching smelled nothing. “Upon receipt of the anonymous tip, the police had a duty to respond and investigate to … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on KY: 2 am knock-and-talk based on tip was suppressed where tip quickly proved wrong