Daily Archives: September 16, 2014

NYTimes: Editorial: Smartwatches and Weak Privacy Rules

NYTimes: Editorial: Smartwatches and Weak Privacy Rules: It’s true that the devices could help some people lead healthier lives. The problem is that most of the medical and personal information collected by fitness trackers and apps is not protected by … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on NYTimes: Editorial: Smartwatches and Weak Privacy Rules

Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire

Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire: Texas’ warrantless blood draw statute has been challenged and in some cases declared unconstitutional by intermediate state appellate judges in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 McNeely … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire

Daily Beast: Your Arrest Video Is Going Online. Who Will See It?

Daily Beast: Your Arrest Video Is Going Online. Who Will See It? by Jacob Seigel: America is rushing to outfit cops with cameras, but even experts aren’t sure of the laws regulating the storage of the videos they capture—or determining … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Daily Beast: Your Arrest Video Is Going Online. Who Will See It?

Missing posts for book supplement added back in

Those cases that will definitely make it into the 2015 book supplement have been added back in. Those marked with an * weren’t. Yes, and still behind.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Missing posts for book supplement added back in

CA11: Officer denied qualified immunity for slamming passive arrestee to pavement

“We have repeatedly ruled that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment, and is denied qualified immunity, if he or she uses gratuitous and excessive force against a suspect who is under control, not resisting, and obeying commands. See, e.g., … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer denied qualified immunity for slamming passive arrestee to pavement

CA11: Courthouse security guard denied qualified immunity for twisting arm of a female lawyer on the phone

Plaintiff in this § 1983 case was a lawyer entering the Fulton County Courthouse. She put her briefcase and purse on the conveyor belt for the x-ray machine, but she set off the metal detector. She was instructed to take … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Courthouse security guard denied qualified immunity for twisting arm of a female lawyer on the phone

CA9: A roving game warden stop not a proper administrative search

“We must decide whether a suspicionless roving automobile stop of commercial fishers made while they drive on a public highway to investigate compliance with Washington fish and game laws constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure within the meaning of the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: A roving game warden stop not a proper administrative search

MO: “I need to talk to you” is a request not a command

Defendant was not seized by officer who, based on an anonymous tip that defendant was armed, stopped near defendant and walked toward him saying “I need to talk to you.” Defendant backpadeled and reached for his waistband. The officer drew … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MO: “I need to talk to you” is a request not a command

D.Utah: Defendant was clearly “seized” at the police station; couldn’t even go to bathroom without escort

Defendant was transported to the police station in the caged back of a patrol car and the police had his ID. He was kept incommunicado, denied food and water, and escorted to the bathroom. He was seized, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Utah: Defendant was clearly “seized” at the police station; couldn’t even go to bathroom without escort

CA2: Court lacks “high level of confidence” for inevitable discovery to apply

Here, the search discovering defendant’s illegal firearms violated the Fourth Amendment, but the government argued for inevitable discovery, but the court lacks a “high level of confidence” that the officers would have inevitably discovered it. The government’s argument was essentially … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Inevitable discovery, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA2: Court lacks “high level of confidence” for inevitable discovery to apply