OH8: Entry into def’s home for DWI arrest wasn’t with sufficient justification

Police officers’ warrantless forced home entry to arrest defendant suspected of OVI violated the Fourth Amendment and the Ohio Constitution because, under the totality of the circumstances. Evidence that defendant turned into his driveway and parked the car before the officer had a chance to follow defendant or identify himself as an officer, “ran” into his house and locked the door after the officer indicated he wanted to talk to defendant did not establish the officer was in “hot pursuit.” The only articulated reasons for the officer’s belief that defendant was driving while intoxicated was his speeding and slurred speech, and that wasn’t enough. City of Berea v. Collins, 2014-Ohio-3822, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 3746 (8th Dist. September 4, 2014).

Defendants were in a pickup near the border with two dirt bikes just laying against the side of the truck and not secured properly. This heightened the officers’ suspicion that these were not serious dirt bikers, and the bikes were just props. After the stop, more reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Saiz, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123366 (D. Ariz. June 20, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Border search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.