Category Archives: Seizure

NC: Def’s consensual return to scene of search warrant didn’t violate Bailey

Officers investigating a sex offense had plenty of reasonable cause for a search warrant. Officers were watching the house and stopped defendant after he left and they got him to return to the place of the search in his own … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Def’s consensual return to scene of search warrant didn’t violate Bailey

S.D.Ga.: Being bumped by a police car and fleeing three more miles wasn’t a seizure

Defendant wasn’t seized by being bumped by police car because he went another three miles without stopping. “Moreover, the Eleventh Circuit and courts across different circuits have concluded that no seizure occurs where police attempt to stop a fleeing vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Being bumped by a police car and fleeing three more miles wasn’t a seizure

W.D.Tenn.: Reasonable to block and stop a car that an officer thought had the subject of an arrest warrant in it

It was reasonable for the officer to block a car because he reasonably suspected that the person he wanted on an arrest warrant was in it and the honking of the car horn might have been a warning to others … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Reasonable to block and stop a car that an officer thought had the subject of an arrest warrant in it

E.D.Wis.: Impersonating a DEA agent in one’s car justifies automobile exception

Defendant was arrested for impersonating a DEA officer and using his car to do it. That gave probable cause to search the car. Defendant’s argument that there was an unreasonable inventory are off the mark. United States v. Wade, 2018 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Impersonating a DEA agent in one’s car justifies automobile exception

D.D.C.: Overdetention claim doesn’t lie under 4A but does under 5A

Plaintiff’s overdetention claim doesn’t lie under the Fourth Amendment but it does under the Fifth. “According to Jones, strip searching an inmate who has been ordered released before returning that inmate to the general population violates the Fourth Amendment unless … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Seizure | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Overdetention claim doesn’t lie under 4A but does under 5A

E.D.Va.: When officer takes your license to run it, you’re seized

“Officer Myers’ instruction to ‘hang tight’ while he ran Defendant’s driver’s license [and had it in hand], would lead a reasonable person in Defendant’s shoes not to feel free to leave. Thus, the consensual encounter became a seizure under the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: When officer takes your license to run it, you’re seized

W.D.N.C.: When they had PC for rural house, entry to freeze situation was reasonable when magistrate was two hours away

After police stopped a car suspected in drug deals, they learned that the drugs came from a particular address which was used as a distribution point. They developed probable cause for the house. They were two hours away from a … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: When they had PC for rural house, entry to freeze situation was reasonable when magistrate was two hours away

E.D.Pa.: No seizure until def made to accompany officer to security office

Police used intel to make an inquiry of defendant. Until he was made to accompany the officer to a security office, he wasn’t seized. Then, there was consent on the totality. United States v. Martin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134183 … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: No seizure until def made to accompany officer to security office

IL: To argue defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing “seizure” instead of “search” is frivolous here

Defendant claimed his counsel was ineffective for not arguing the seizure was unreasonable rather than the search. That’s frivolous. People v. Lee, 2018 IL App (3d) 160100, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 569 (Aug. 1, 2018). [I had the same argument … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IL: To argue defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing “seizure” instead of “search” is frivolous here

MI: Policy to photograph and fingerprint detainees violated 4A and stated claim against city

The Grand Rapids Police Department has a policy permitting officers to photograph and fingerprint people who are stopped just because they want to. The plaintiffs stated a claim for relief against the city for its policy. Johnson v. Vanderkooi, 2018 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on MI: Policy to photograph and fingerprint detainees violated 4A and stated claim against city

D.Conn.: Posting things to Facebook is a waiver of any REP, even in a “friends” setting

By posting to Facebook, even with a friends only setting, defendant waived his reasonable expectation of privacy in his postings. On the merits of the search warrant for Facebook, probable cause was shown. United States v. Westley, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Posting things to Facebook is a waiver of any REP, even in a “friends” setting

Cal.: Carpenter‘s search warrant requirement does not apply to cell phone records merely used to show that co-conspirators communicated with each other

Carpenter’s search warrant requirement does not apply to cell phone records merely used to show that co-conspirators communicated with each other. In light of the whole trial, it wasn’t all that important. People v. Anderson, 2018 Cal. LEXIS 4698 (June … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Seizure | Comments Off on Cal.: Carpenter‘s search warrant requirement does not apply to cell phone records merely used to show that co-conspirators communicated with each other

IN: A reasonable person in def’s position would not have felt detained and could have asked for his partially blocked car to be let out

The officer was inquiring of suspicious persons but did not yet have reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s car was partially blocked in, and the inquiries weren’t directed at him. A reasonable person in his position would have felt he could have asked … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on IN: A reasonable person in def’s position would not have felt detained and could have asked for his partially blocked car to be let out

D.Me.: In a knock-and-talk for CP, it was not unreasonable to tell defendant he had the choice of consenting to seizure of the computer or the house pending arrival of a SW

Officers came to defendant’s house essentially as a knock and talk to obtain child pornography on his computer which they knew he had. They told him he could consent to a seizure of the computer while they got a warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Knock and talk, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Me.: In a knock-and-talk for CP, it was not unreasonable to tell defendant he had the choice of consenting to seizure of the computer or the house pending arrival of a SW

NYLJ: ‘DeBour’ Faces Increased Criticism: Where Do We Go From Here?

NYLJ: ‘DeBour’ Faces Increased Criticism: Where Do We Go From Here? By Barry Kamins: In this article on Criminal Law and Procedure, Barry Kamins looks at criticism of ‘People v. DeBours,’ the case establishing the level of intrusion allowed during … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NYLJ: ‘DeBour’ Faces Increased Criticism: Where Do We Go From Here?

CA9: Unreasonable detention of those present when SW executed not shown

“The district court also did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the individual defendants on Strong and Byers’ claims that the detention violated their Fourth Amendment rights. Officers may detain all persons present when a warrant is … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: Unreasonable detention of those present when SW executed not shown

WA: Where ptf didn’t know he was being pursued, act of force to knock him from motorcycle doesn’t get qualified immunity

Where plaintiff showed he didn’t know he was being pursued by police while on his motorcycle, the officer’s act of opening his car door to knock him off his bike was a question for the jury, and the officer gets … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: Where ptf didn’t know he was being pursued, act of force to knock him from motorcycle doesn’t get qualified immunity

NE: Stopping car leaving house under surveillance for which SW was sought was reasonable just to gather information

Defendant’s car was leaving a house under surveillance as a place where a gun safe was known to have been taken after a burglary to break it open. A search warrant was being sought. The stop was a seizure, but … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NE: Stopping car leaving house under surveillance for which SW was sought was reasonable just to gather information

CA9: Being detained and then moved with hands briefly behind back wasn’t an arrest

Defendant’s brief detention and moving him from a public area to a private area was not a seizure, even though his hands were held behind his back as he walked. United States v. Torres, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 11897 (9th … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Being detained and then moved with hands briefly behind back wasn’t an arrest

VI: In a traffic stop, def delayed in getting out and made furtive movements; officer asked “what do you have there?” Answer [“Just some weed.”] wasn’t 5A violation under Berkemer

Defendant was stopped for passing on a double solid line. The officer called out through the vehicle PA for him to get out of the car, but he first fished around moving things. When the officer got to the window, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on VI: In a traffic stop, def delayed in getting out and made furtive movements; officer asked “what do you have there?” Answer [“Just some weed.”] wasn’t 5A violation under Berkemer